★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ||
1825 Jan. 31 | |||
Procedure Code | |||
ch. Preface .... | |||
General | |||
1. ... Flexibility principle | |||
Another consideration?? of the ... is its ^flexibility^: | |||
the proviison it makes for minimising evil in such individual cases according to p/proportion to the] the quantity of evil reasonably | |||
to be expected in the different cases giving the preference [/sometimes] either | |||
to the direct p/???] or to the collateral ends of justice. | |||
The topics to which the diverfication is acceptable | |||
of being applied in in law applied accordingly may be thus enumerated | |||
When collect them together: 1. Distance in the line of place. 2. in the line of time. 3. Circumstances influencing sensibility | |||
as ... | |||
The only object that principle the flexibility ... to be | |||
changes of p/???] deception in respect of the appropriate | |||
tasks? : 2. charges of abuse by perpetually erroneous ... | |||
in relation to them | |||
But for ...in the account given good and evil the foundation to beconsidered is most absolute always relative and comparation. | |||
Conform then the evil from flexibility with the evil from inflexibility. In case of inflexibility, the matter will be stragely conduct of the chances it will in virtue of the doing less evil by the replication of it then would have place if in application non made of it: but when there is inflexibility the chances requisite to holding the right are infinity to one. ... but in ... the state of things supposed by the objector would be ... minimal experience and observation, if the | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
1825 Jan. 31
Procedure Code
ch. Preface ....
General
1. ... Flexibility principle
Another consideration?? of the ... is its ^flexibility^:
the proviison it makes for minimising evil in such individual cases according to p/proportion to the] the quantity of evil reasonably to be expected in the different cases giving the preference [/sometimes] either to the direct p/???] or to the collateral ends of justice.
The topics to which the diverfication is acceptable of being applied in in law applied accordingly may be thus enumerated
When collect them together: 1. Distance in the line of place. 2. in the line of time. 3. Circumstances influencing sensibility as ...
The only object that principle the flexibility ... to be changes of p/???] deception in respect of the appropriate tasks? : 2. charges of abuse by perpetually erroneous ... in relation to them
But for ...in the account given good and evil the foundation to beconsidered is most absolute always relative and comparation. Conform then the evil from flexibility with the evil from inflexibility. In case of inflexibility, the matter will be stragely conduct of the chances it will in virtue of the doing less evil by the replication of it then would have place if in application non made of it: but when there is inflexibility the chances requisite to holding the right are infinity to one. ... but in ... the state of things supposed by the objector would be ... minimal experience and observation, if the
|
Identifier: | JB/057/251/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-01-31 |
not numbered |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
251 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18581 |
|||
