JB/036/095/002

Click Here To Edit

So in the case of the when the proceedings are considered inquisitorial mode

When therefore precipitation in judication is spoken of, the
sort of shape in which the supposed undue precipitation presents itself naturally is - that
which has place so in so far as the Judge in pronouncing
upon the evidence and the arguments had before him, fail of
occupying in the consideration of the subject so great a length
of time as is necessary to the securing to the decision he pronounces
the quality property <add>attribute of rectitude.

How a Precipitation in judication thus understood,
now let us see whether of all unarguable rules it is the most
dangerous.

Look to English judicature. Wortm or Adverse as , it this system
in so large a part of its extent, in the system is - uncontroveribly adverse
to the ends of justice , - still, taken as a whole it is perhaps the least upon the whole so of any as yet any where
established: strange indeed it would be, if it were not
France : there much less so than that of Spain. Of this system
the part in most general estimation, & of the testimonial branch most generally esteemed and the part least undeservedly
esteemed is that, in which a Juror per the judicating
is composed of a professional Judge, with a company of non-
professional Judges under the name of a Jury: the Jury, in the exercise of their functions, acting
in so far as disposed, under the guidance of the Judge. Well
now - Immediately after the evidence with the <add>such comments <add>as have been made on it, is closed 1

<note>without <add>so much as a moments
delay taken for reflection,
comes if at all
the opinion of the Judge:
opinion or no opinion
immediately again , as
often as not, the decision
of the Jury.
</note>no time for by</add> sometime can
without every hearing any opinion from
before the Judge opinion of the Judge is pronounced in every case always
the opinion decree of the Jury not for after
the hearing of that same opinion. The promptitude thus displayed
is it in the power of precipitation to exceed it? This same promptitude
as given. has it ever, on the part of any person , been the subject of complaint? No, never. Where promptitude in
this
this degree has place,
does it ever enter into
the any one man's conception, if that the any
such disapprobative appellations
as precipitation is in that account applicable
to it? No, never.
If such promptitude in
such a degree, and in no and greater can it exceed
higher degree can it have place
which is precipitation, preciptitaion so far from being the most dangerous a Spanish judicature can , may might with much more propriety be termed the petty as in the language of the same rhetoric be spoken of as the harbour towards which it is to be wished that its course should may be deviated.

Identifier: | JB/036/095/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.
Date_1	1822-08-12	Marginal Summary Numbering	12-15
Box	036	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	095	Info in main headings field	constitut. code
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	a11 / b6 / d9 / e5
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::i&m [fleur de lys] 1818]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	arthur wellesley, duke of wellington
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1818
Notes public		ID Number	11019
Box Contents