JB/050/035/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/035/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Batch upload Box 50 - first attempt - fingers crossed
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
under construction ...
 
 
<head>CERTAINTY <add>Procedure regular.</add> - Non-appearance &#x2014;<!-- mdash on the line, not mid-line --> Contumacy &#x2014;<!-- mdash on the line, not mid-line --> Traverse &#x2014; Confession.</head>
<p>A man against whom a charge is made , <del>must</del> <add>either</add>
<lb/>
answers <add>to</add> it or does not &#x2014;  If he answers <add>to</add> it,
<lb/>
<del>by , if that which he says has any <gap/></del> <add>his answer to be pertinent , must amount either</add>
<lb/>
to a confession or a denial
<lb/></p>
<p>If he does not , it must be either because being
<lb/>
absent, he cannot, or being present, he will not.
<lb/>
In <del><gap/> the prescription of Procedure</del>  <add><gap/> convictions upon <del><gap/></del></add> <gap/>
<lb/>
slightly penal , no difficulty has <add>ever</add> been made
<lb/>
of considering either of these methods of behaviour
<lb/>
as tantamount to <del>a</del> confessions of
<lb/>
the suspected offences charged &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
<p>Only out of <add>by Common Law</add> kindness to the offender , for non-appearance ,
<lb/>
the way was to subject him to
<lb/>
a <add><gap/></add> Punishment which was <add>at least</add> equal <del><unclear>what</unclear></del><!-- or where --> <add>to, &amp; in</add> <del>with</del>
<lb/>
most cases , superior to that which he could incur
<lb/>
by conviction , &amp; was the same for one original
<lb/>
offence as for another, &#x2014; for continuancy
<lb/>
 
<pb/>
 
to a Punishment , a thousand times worse
<lb/>
<add>than</add><!-- added in pencil --> the heaviest he could suffer by conviction.
<lb/></p>





Revision as of 10:35, 22 April 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...


CERTAINTY Procedure regular. - Non-appearance — Contumacy — Traverse — Confession.

A man against whom a charge is made , must either
answers to it or does not — If he answers to it,
by , if that which he says has any his answer to be pertinent , must amount either
to a confession or a denial

If he does not , it must be either because being
absent, he cannot, or being present, he will not.
In the prescription of Procedure convictions upon
slightly penal , no difficulty has ever been made
of considering either of these methods of behaviour
as tantamount to a confessions of
the suspected offences charged —

Only out of by Common Law kindness to the offender , for non-appearance ,
the way was to subject him to
a Punishment which was at least equal what to, & in with
most cases , superior to that which he could incur
by conviction , & was the same for one original
offence as for another, — for continuancy

---page break---
to a Punishment , a thousand times worse
than the heaviest he could suffer by conviction.




Identifier: | JB/050/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

035

Info in main headings field

certainty procedure regular. non-appearance - contumacy - traverse - confession

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16026

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in