JB/050/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/075/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Batch upload Box 50 - first attempt - fingers crossed
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
under construction ...
 
 
<head>CERTAINTY.  LAW X FACT.  Barrington.</head>
<p>Mr barrington in his Observation on the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>
<lb/>
takes occasion to observe <del>from thence that a Jury</del> <add>that on the Authority of that Statute</add> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> it is
<lb/>
clear that a Jury may find what verdict they please - but
<lb/>
this is to be understood only <unclear>of</unclear> <sic>disscusins</sic> : for it is only <sic>disscusins</sic>
<lb/>
that are mentioned: that is of a species of <gap/> <add>Action</add>
<lb/>
which now is never brought.
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<head>CERTAINTY LAW X FACT.</head>
<p>Till then the controversy must remain <gap/>.
<lb/></p>
<p>No boundary Line can be drawn between the Provinces of the
<lb/>
Judge &amp; Jury
<lb/></p>
<p>The Law &amp; the Fact must remain inextricably entangled in
<lb/>
each other
<lb/></p>
<p>The mind vibrating between opposite prejudices
<lb/></p>
<p>A perpetual source of confusion contradiction suspicion <gap/> &amp; error
<lb/></p>
<p>That <sic>Chymistry</sic> which shall find out an expedient to
<lb/>
overcome this obstinate adhesion , &amp; present the two questions <add>points</add> disengaged
<lb/>
&amp; <gap/> from each other , will be allowed to have operated
<lb/>
no <add>a not</add> unimportant <add>a</add> precipitation
<lb/></p>
<p>They speak of them as <hi rend='underline'>actually</hi> complicated &amp; they
<lb/>
seem reconciled by Custom to the considering them as <hi rend='underline'>essentially</hi> so
<lb/></p>





Revision as of 11:04, 22 April 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...


CERTAINTY. LAW X FACT. Barrington.

Mr barrington in his Observation on the
takes occasion to observe from thence that a Jury that on the Authority of that Statute [+] it is
clear that a Jury may find what verdict they please - but
this is to be understood only of disscusins : for it is only disscusins
that are mentioned: that is of a species of Action
which now is never brought.


---page break---

CERTAINTY LAW X FACT.

Till then the controversy must remain .

No boundary Line can be drawn between the Provinces of the
Judge & Jury

The Law & the Fact must remain inextricably entangled in
each other

The mind vibrating between opposite prejudices

A perpetual source of confusion contradiction suspicion & error

That Chymistry which shall find out an expedient to
overcome this obstinate adhesion , & present the two questions points disengaged
& from each other , will be allowed to have operated
no a not unimportant a precipitation

They speak of them as actually complicated & they
seem reconciled by Custom to the considering them as essentially so




Identifier: | JB/050/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

certainty. law & fact barrington

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16066

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in