JB/541/448/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/541/448/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- pencil addition --> <p><note> 1793-8-16</note><lb/> J.B. <gap/> Spencer <gap/></p> <p><del> <add> <del>Your Lordship</del></add> in <del> In Figuring to yourself the idea of</del> <add> representing to yourself an idea</add> a scheme<lb/> of "real public utility <del>"</del> obstructed by objections unnecessarily<lb/> "persisted in" <del> on your Lordship's part</del> your<lb/> Lordship is pleased to express that regret <add> of the existence of</add> which <lb/> <del> in such a case it need no assurances on your</del> <lb/> <del>without any such assurances nobody</del> <add> in such circumstances</add> could <del>not be</del> <add> entertain</add> <lb/> <del> <add>be</add> as dubious to any body</del> <add> a doubt <del>problematical</del> </add> nobody could entertain<lb/> <del>a</del> doubt.  This being the case<add> in this view</add> it may be proper<lb/> your Lordship should be apprised that the loss<lb/> to say nothing of <del>the</del> such parts of the utility of<lb/> the scheme as <del>is</del> <add> are</add> not of a pecuniary nature, but<lb/> if it be of any value at all of an importance <add> value</add> far<lb/> beyond pecuniary, the loss to the public <del> in ha</del><lb/> in hard money only by the <add> a years</add> delay of <del>it</del> a year<lb/> would be £9,000: and the delay of a season <del>£</del> <add> should</add> <lb/> <add> it not amount to the delay of a whole year <del>will</del> would amount at<lb/> least to a great part of it.</add></p> <p> Your Lordship's politeness <add> if vanity does not deceive me</add> goes so far as<lb/> even to attribute <del>some</del> <add>something of</add> merit to the projection of<lb/> such <add> a </add> scheme, and <del> your sympathy for the author</del> <add> under the supposition of its ability, <note> the sympathy which<lb/> the situation <add> <gap/> <gap/></add> of the<lb/> author would in that case<lb/> naturally <del> arise in</del> <lb/> excite in<lb/> your Lordship's<lb/> breast</note> <lb/> sympathy which your Lordship's goodness would in that <add> naturally</add> <lb/> <add>case feel for the author</add> suggest a regret at the idea of subjecting him<lb?> to the hypothetical danger of a penalty of<lb/> 5,000.  That danger as I set out with stating<lb/> to your Lordship is but imaginary, and the apprehension <add> idea of its having been <del>represented</del> <add> meant to</add><lb/> <del>of it as</del> <add> be stated as a</add> possible <add> one must have</add> originated in my not having stated <add> that part of</add> the<lb/><add>case</add>. </p>  
<!-- pencil addition --> <p><note> 1793-8-16</note><lb/> J.B. to <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> Spencer Not sent</p> <p><del>Your Lordship in<lb/> <add>In</add> Figuring to yourself the idea of</del> <add> Representing to yourself an idea</add> a scheme<lb/> of "real public utility obstructed by objections unnecessarily<lb/> "persisted in" <del> on your Lordship's part</del> your<lb/> Lordship is pleased to express that regret <add> of the existence of</add> which <lb/> <del> in such a case it needed no assurances on your</del> <lb/> <del>without any such assurances </del> <add> in such circumstances</add> nobody could <del>not be</del> <add> entertain</add> <lb/> <del> <add>be</add> as dubious to any body</del> <add> a doubt <del>problematical</del> </add> nobody could entertain<lb/> <del>a</del> doubt.  This being the case<add> In this view</add> it may be proper<lb/> your Lordship should be apprised that the loss<lb/> to say nothing of <del>the</del> such parts of the utility of<lb/> the scheme as <del>is</del> <add> are</add> not of a pecuniary nature, but<lb/> if it be of any value at all of an importance <add> value</add> far<lb/> beyond pecuniary, the loss to the public <del> in ha</del><lb/> in hard money only by the <add> a years</add> delay of <del>it</del> a year<lb/> would be £9,000: and the delay of a season <del>£</del> <add> should</add> <lb/> <add> it not amount to the delay of a whole year <del>will</del> would amount at<lb/> least to a great part of it.</add></p> <p> Your Lordship's politeness <add> if vanity does not deceive me</add> goes so far as<lb/> even to attribute <del>some</del> <add>something of</add> merit to the projection of<lb/> such <add> a </add> scheme, and <del> your sympathy for the author</del> <add> under the supposition of its ability,</add> <note> the sympathy which<lb/> the <add> idea of the</add> situation of the<lb/> author would in that case<lb/> naturally <del> arise in</del> <lb/> excite in<lb/> your Lordship's<lb/> breast</note> <lb/> sympathy which your Lordship's goodness would in that <add> naturally</add> <lb/> <add>case feel for the author</add> suggests a regret at the idea of subjecting him<lb/> to the hypothetical danger of a penalty of<lb/> 5,000.  That danger as I set out with stating<lb/> to your Lordship is but imaginary, and the apprehension <add> idea of its having been <del>represented</del> <add> meant to</add><lb/> <del>of it as</del> <add> be stated as a</add> possible <add> one must have</add> originated in my not having stated <add> that part of</add> the<lb/><add>case</add>. </p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:28, 4 February 2018

Click Here To Edit

1793-8-16
J.B. to Ld Spencer Not sent

Your Lordship in
In Figuring to yourself the idea of
Representing to yourself an idea a scheme
of "real public utility obstructed by objections unnecessarily
"persisted in" on your Lordship's part your
Lordship is pleased to express that regret of the existence of which
in such a case it needed no assurances on your
without any such assurances in such circumstances nobody could not be entertain
be as dubious to any body a doubt problematical nobody could entertain
a doubt. This being the case In this view it may be proper
your Lordship should be apprised that the loss
to say nothing of the such parts of the utility of
the scheme as is are not of a pecuniary nature, but
if it be of any value at all of an importance value far
beyond pecuniary, the loss to the public in ha
in hard money only by the a years delay of it a year
would be £9,000: and the delay of a season £ should
it not amount to the delay of a whole year will would amount at
least to a great part of it.

Your Lordship's politeness if vanity does not deceive me goes so far as
even to attribute some something of merit to the projection of
such a scheme, and your sympathy for the author under the supposition of its ability, the sympathy which
the idea of the situation of the
author would in that case
naturally arise in
excite in
your Lordship's
breast

sympathy which your Lordship's goodness would in that naturally
case feel for the author suggests a regret at the idea of subjecting him
to the hypothetical danger of a penalty of
5,000. That danger as I set out with stating
to your Lordship is but imaginary, and the apprehension idea of its having been represented <add> meant to
of it as be stated as a possible one must have originated in my not having stated that part of the
case.



Identifier: | JB/541/448/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1793-08-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

448

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in