★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 June 12 7<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (2) (7</p> <!-- notes in a different hand --> <p> <note> 9<lb/> Rule 1 All comprehensiveness<lb/> H.B.'s <del>speech</del> corresponding<lb/> rule p.112</note></p> <p> 1 Rule the first. <del>Rule of</del> <add> Principle is</add> all <hi rend="underline">comprehensiveness</hi>. <add>J.B.'s</add> Rule.<lb/> | <p> 1829 June 12 7<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (2) (7</p> <!-- notes in a different hand --> <p> <note> 9<lb/> Rule 1 All comprehensiveness<lb/> H.B.'s <del>speech</del> corresponding<lb/> rule p.112</note></p> <p> 1 Rule the first. <del>Rule of</del> <add> Principle is</add> all <hi rend="underline">comprehensiveness</hi>. <add>J.B.'s</add> Rule.<lb/>All the field of law, be your <add> plan of</add> reform all comprehensive <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <lb/> H.B.'s rule. "But as the fundamental principle for which I<lb/> "contend is — to allow no part of the law by itself, or <gap/><lb/> "considering <hi rend="underline">all</hi> the <del>parts</del> other parts," <del>Plan</del> there can be<lb/> "no difficulty, consistently with this doctrine, to enlarge the<lb/> allowance of <hi rend="underline">costs</hi> as soon as <del><gap/></del> Place of this rule — the<lb/> 112<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of 120 pages</p> <p><note>10<lb/> So again as to Bankrupt<lb/> dues</note></p> <p> Then again speaking of Bankrupt Law <unclear>I saw</unclear><lb/> "Partial legislation on such a subject is pregnant with mischief" — <lb/> <hi rend="underline">'On such a subject'</hi>: here then to the all-comprehensive<lb/> rule laid down in the last preceding page but <unclear>ever</unclear> is<lb/> a virtual limitation, and <foreign><hi rend="underline">pro <unclear>parte</unclear></hi></foreign> a contribution</p> <p><note> 11<lb/> This the place for the<lb/> word edification</note></p> <p> Here would have been a place for the word edification<lb/> which <del> <gap/></del> by the theoretical pen now employing <add> at work kept</add> itself<lb/> on these pages eleven years ago hath been planted in the <lb/> language, and which all the frost which the God <add><gap/></add> of <unclear>Islam</unclear><lb/> could bring to view upon it has not been able to kill and<lb/> eradicate to prevent from <gap/> the <del>sacred</del> <add> Gospel</add> <gap/></p> <p><note>12<lb/> J.B.'s rule applied<lb/> to written Pleadings</note></p> <p> Rule per J.B. When you have laid down a principle<lb/> if you add on Mr Brougham's <gap/> in <hi rend="underline">practice</hi>, that is to say<lb/> proposed arrangements having for their ground the principle, make<lb/> give to your arrangements all together <del>the</del> breadth equal to that<lb/> of your principle: for as an intention to reform being the intention<lb/> professed, whatsoever you do not profess to abolish, you confirm<lb/> <del> 1. Measure for this rule non <gap/></del> non-continuation is approbation<lb/> <del>1. Whatever you do not abolish you confirm</del></p> <p> Apply this to Written Pleading. Of the Classes <gap/><lb/> with which Judge's sinister interest has covered the field of procedure<lb/> are of the <unclear>tallest</unclear> is that which bears Written Pleadings: the whole<lb/> growth from the <unclear>meanest</unclear> fibre of the root to the uppermost <gap/> <gap/><lb/> is opposition to this law rule. Will the <gap/> <hi rend="underline">practice</hi> <gap/>, what does<lb/> <add>it</add><lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> it with the <gap/> <gap/>?<lb/> How it conducts it? the<lb/> all that it does with it<lb/> as to <gap/>: cutting off<lb/> a trifling <gap/> or two,<lb/> <gap/> there giving the <gap/><lb/> former root to <del>all</del> <lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page --> every part <del> of which</del> <gap/> which nothing is said.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1829 June 12 7
J.B. on Brougham's Speech
(2) (7
9
Rule 1 All comprehensiveness
H.B.'s speech corresponding
rule p.112
1 Rule the first. Rule of Principle is all comprehensiveness. J.B.'s Rule.
All the field of law, be your plan of reform all comprehensive (a)
H.B.'s rule. "But as the fundamental principle for which I
"contend is — to allow no part of the law by itself, or
"considering all the parts other parts," Plan there can be
"no difficulty, consistently with this doctrine, to enlarge the
allowance of costs as soon as Place of this rule — the
112th of 120 pages
10
So again as to Bankrupt
dues
Then again speaking of Bankrupt Law I saw
"Partial legislation on such a subject is pregnant with mischief" —
'On such a subject': here then to the all-comprehensive
rule laid down in the last preceding page but ever is
a virtual limitation, and pro parte a contribution
11
This the place for the
word edification
Here would have been a place for the word edification
which by the theoretical pen now employing at work kept itself
on these pages eleven years ago hath been planted in the
language, and which all the frost which the God of Islam
could bring to view upon it has not been able to kill and
eradicate to prevent from the sacred Gospel
12
J.B.'s rule applied
to written Pleadings
Rule per J.B. When you have laid down a principle
if you add on Mr Brougham's in practice, that is to say
proposed arrangements having for their ground the principle, make
give to your arrangements all together the breadth equal to that
of your principle: for as an intention to reform being the intention
professed, whatsoever you do not profess to abolish, you confirm
1. Measure for this rule non non-continuation is approbation
1. Whatever you do not abolish you confirm
Apply this to Written Pleading. Of the Classes
with which Judge's sinister interest has covered the field of procedure
are of the tallest is that which bears Written Pleadings: the whole
growth from the meanest fibre of the root to the uppermost
is opposition to this law rule. Will the practice , what does
it
it with the ?
How it conducts it? the
all that it does with it
as to : cutting off
a trifling or two,
there giving the
former root to all
every part of which which nothing is said.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-12 |
9-12 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
013 |
jb on brougham's speech |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 / d7 / e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3710 |
|||
