JB/169/178/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/178/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
What concerns me to <del>think</del><add>reflect on</add> is, that at any rate more<lb/>
 
or less of the public money <gap/> be given <del>in</del> away, and<lb/>
 
in a certain sense for nothing, and <add>even</add> more of it, <del><gap/></del><add>under</add> the arrangement<lb/>
<add>to</add> which I should gain the preference, than <add>has been given</add> at present<lb/>
Had no such su as £1000 been given to the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">spurious</hi> inventor, I must confess I see no adequate justification<lb/>
for giving any such sum to the <hi rend="underline">real</hi> one: but one<lb/>
such sum having been given <hi rend="underline">unjustly</hi> (though with very pure<lb/>
intentions and from any honourable motives, yet  as it turns<lb/>
out unjustly) <hi rend="underline">another</hi> such sum <add>or something equivalent</add> seems absolutely <del>separate</del><lb/>
necessary to <hi rend="underline">rectify the injustice</hi>.  <del>The forth</del>
<add>To give</add> the <hi rend="underline">first</hi> £1000 was <del>not</del><add>far from</add> necessary to the <hi rend="underline">promoting</hi> of the<lb/>
<del>object of the establishment</del><add>purpose of the Board<add>institution in question:-
the</add></add><add> <del>was taken</del> for the encouragement of Agriculture</add> but to withhold the <hi rend="underline">second</hi>, would<lb/>
be to <hi rend="underline">counteract</hi> them.  The giving the first was an injury<lb/>
done to the public by mistake: <del>not</del> the persisting in not<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:34, 23 February 2018

Click Here To Edit

What concerns me to thinkreflect on is, that at any rate more
or less of the public money be given in away, and
in a certain sense for nothing, and even more of it, under the arrangement
to which I should gain the preference, than has been given at present
Had no such su as £1000 been given to the
spurious inventor, I must confess I see no adequate justification
for giving any such sum to the real one: but one
such sum having been given unjustly (though with very pure
intentions and from any honourable motives, yet as it turns
out unjustly) another such sum or something equivalent seems absolutely separate
necessary to rectify the injustice. The forth To give the first £1000 was notfar from necessary to the promoting of the
object of the establishmentpurpose of the Board<add>institution in question:- the</add> was taken for the encouragement of Agriculture but to withhold the second, would
be to counteract them. The giving the first was an injury
done to the public by mistake: not the persisting in not



Identifier: | JB/169/178/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

1795-10-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

178

Info in main headings field

anderson and elkington lett. ii

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

56998

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in