JB/011/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/019/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 June 17<lb/> Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. &amp; H.B.? <note>Supplement</note></p> <p> <note>reformation Agenda<lb/> Agitation &amp; Contribution</note></p> <!-- margin notes in another hand --><p><note>15.<lb/> For abolition of Forest<lb/> law the <foreign>Charta Foresta</foreign><lb/> sufficient the <hi rend="underline">subruling</hi>,lb/> few being interested in<lb/> giving execution &amp; effect<lb/> to it.</note></p> <p> In the tyranny of which the <del>Forest</del> <gap/>-<gap/><lb/> Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under <add><gap/></add> stories<lb/> no instrument: for the abolition of it, that some <gap/> <gap/><lb/> of paper <add> was</add> sufficient: the <hi rend="underline">sub-ruling</hi> few, who had been the <gap/> by<lb/> it buy a <gap/> to <gap/> that to the interest they added the<lb/> pieces required and sufficient for giving <add>securing</add> <gap/> and effect<lb/> to it</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Not so as to abolition<lb/> of sale &amp; denial of<lb/> justice by <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></Note></p> <p> <gap/> different was and is the case <add> the <gap/> of <gap/></add> in regard to the<lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">Magna Charta<</hi>/foreign>: the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> and so <gap/> but subsequently<lb/> so <gap/> supposed instrument of adequate security <gap/><lb/> and sale and denial of justice.  For its <gap/> and instrument<lb/> tyranny on this shape have the tyrants <gap/> and instruments<lb/> <gap/>, ever <add> <gap/></add> <gap/> and at all times<gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/><lb/> <gap/> to Judges.  Of then <del>depended the</del> who <gap/> of <add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/> being <gap/> and it had been and <gap/> to be <del>the</del> shares<lb/> in the benefit <del><gap/></del> such was the selection, <gap/> to the interest they<lb/> added the <gap/> requisite and sufficient for giving <gap/><lb/> <gap/> and <gap/> to the grievance <gap/> of giving <gap/><lb/> and effect to the <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> remedy.</p>  
<p> 1829 June 17<lb/> Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. &amp; H.B.? <note>Supplement</note></p> <p> <note>reformation Agenda<lb/> Agitation &amp; Contribution</note></p> <!-- margin notes in another hand --><p><note>15.<lb/> For abolition of Forest<lb/> law the <foreign>Charta Foresta</foreign><lb/> sufficient the <hi rend="underline">subruling</hi><lb/> few being interested in<lb/> giving execution &amp; effect<lb/> to it.</note></p> <p> In the tyranny of which the <del>Forest</del> <gap/>-<gap/><lb/> Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under <add><gap/></add> stories<lb/> no instrument: for the abolition of it, that some <gap/> <gap/><lb/> of paper <add> was</add> sufficient: the <hi rend="underline">sub-ruling</hi> few, who had been the <gap/> by<lb/> it buy a <gap/> to <gap/> that to the interest they added the<lb/> pieces required and sufficient for giving <add>securing</add> <gap/> and effect<lb/> to it</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Not so as to abolition<lb/> of sale &amp; denial of<lb/> justice by <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></note></p> <p> <gap/> different was and is the case <add> the <gap/> of <gap/></add> in regard to the<lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi></foreign>: the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> and so <gap/> but subsequently<lb/> so <gap/> supposed instrument of adequate security <gap/><lb/> and sale and denial of justice.  For its <gap/> and instrument<lb/> tyranny on this shape have the tyrants <gap/> and instruments<lb/> <gap/>, ever <add> <gap/></add> <gap/> and at all times<gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/><lb/> <gap/> to Judges.  Of then <del>depended the</del> who <gap/> of <add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/> being <gap/> and it had been and <gap/> to be <del>the</del> shares<lb/> in the benefit <del><gap/></del> such was the selection, <gap/> to the interest they<lb/> added the <gap/> requisite and sufficient for giving <gap/><lb/> <gap/> and <gap/> to the grievance <gap/> of giving <gap/><lb/> and effect to the <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> remedy.</p>  
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:55, 4 March 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 17
Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. & H.B.? Supplement

reformation Agenda
Agitation & Contribution

15.
For abolition of Forest
law the Charta Foresta
sufficient the subruling
few being interested in
giving execution & effect
to it.

In the tyranny of which the Forest -
Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under stories
no instrument: for the abolition of it, that some
of paper was sufficient: the sub-ruling few, who had been the by
it buy a to that to the interest they added the
pieces required and sufficient for giving securing and effect
to it

16
Not so as to abolition
of sale & denial of
justice by Magna Charta

different was and is the case the of in regard to the
Magna Charta: the and so but subsequently
so supposed instrument of adequate security
and sale and denial of justice. For its and instrument
tyranny on this shape have the tyrants and instruments
, ever and at all times
to Judges. Of then depended the who of
being and it had been and to be the shares
in the benefit such was the selection, to the interest they
added the requisite and sufficient for giving
and to the grievance of giving
and effect to the remedy.


Identifier: | JB/011/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-06-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

petition on dispatch court or review of j & hb?

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3716

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in