★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 June 17<lb/> Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. & H.B.? <note>Supplement</note></p> <p> <note>reformation Agenda<lb/> Agitation & Contribution</note></p> <!-- margin notes in another hand --><p><note>15.<lb/> For abolition of Forest<lb/> law the <foreign>Charta Foresta</foreign><lb/> sufficient the <hi rend="underline">subruling</hi><lb/> few being interested in<lb/> giving execution & effect<lb/> to it.</note></p> <p> In the tyranny of which the <del>Forest</del> <unclear>Monarchy</unclear>-maker<lb/> Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under <add><gap/></add> stories<lb/> no instruments: for the abolition of it, that same simple sheet<lb/> of paper <add> was</add> sufficient: the <hi rend="underline">sub-ruling</hi> few, who had been the <gap/> by<lb/> it being in part to <gap/> that to the interest they added the<lb/> pieces required and sufficient for giving <add>securing</add> execution and effect<lb/> to it</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Not so as to abolition<lb/> of sale & denial of<lb/> justice by <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></note></p> <p> <unclear>Widely</unclear> different was and is the case <add> the <gap/> of <gap/></add> in regard to the<lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi></foreign>: the declined <del><gap/></del> and so quickly but subsequently<lb/> so erroneously supposed instrument of adequate security <unclear>delay,</unclear> <gap/><lb/> and sale and denial of justice. For its <unclear>pushers</unclear> and <unclear>instrumenters</unclear><lb/> tyranny on this shape have the tyrants <gap/> and instruments<lb/> appealed, ever <add> <gap/></add> receivable and at all times absolutely <add>completly</add> < | <p> 1829 June 17<lb/> Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. & H.B.? <note>Supplement</note></p> <p> <note>reformation Agenda<lb/> Agitation & Contribution</note></p> <!-- margin notes in another hand --><p><note>15.<lb/> For abolition of Forest<lb/> law the <foreign>Charta Foresta</foreign><lb/> sufficient the <hi rend="underline">subruling</hi><lb/> few being interested in<lb/> giving execution & effect<lb/> to it.</note></p> <p> In the tyranny of which the <del>Forest</del> <unclear>Monarchy</unclear>-maker<lb/> Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under <add><gap/></add> stories<lb/> no instruments: for the abolition of it, that same simple sheet<lb/> of paper <add> was</add> sufficient: the <hi rend="underline">sub-ruling</hi> few, who had been the <gap/> by<lb/> it being in part to <gap/> that to the interest they added the<lb/> pieces required and sufficient for giving <add>securing</add> execution and effect<lb/> to it</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Not so as to abolition<lb/> of sale & denial of<lb/> justice by <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></note></p> <p> <unclear>Widely</unclear> different was and is the case <add> the <gap/> of <gap/></add> in regard to the<lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi></foreign>: the declined <del><gap/></del> and so quickly but subsequently<lb/> so erroneously supposed instrument of adequate security <unclear>delay,</unclear> <gap/><lb/> and sale and denial of justice. For its <unclear>pushers</unclear> and <unclear>instrumenters</unclear><lb/> tyranny on this shape have the tyrants <gap/> and instruments<lb/> appealed, ever <add> <gap/></add> receivable and at all times absolutely <add>completly</add> <unclear>dependant</unclear> <lb/> <gap/> to Judges. Of those <del>depended the</del> who instead of <add> <unclear>be for fear</unclear> </add><lb/> being suffering under it had been and continued to be <del>the</del> sharers<lb/> in the benefit <del><gap/></del> such was the situation, <unclear>also</unclear> to the interest they<lb/> added the pain requisite and sufficient for giving <gap/><lb/> recourse and <gap/> to the grievances instant of giving execution<lb/> and effect to the <unclear>preludedly</unclear> <add>professedly</add> <unclear>alluded</unclear> remedy.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1829 June 17
Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. & H.B.? Supplement
reformation Agenda
Agitation & Contribution
15.
For abolition of Forest
law the Charta Foresta
sufficient the subruling
few being interested in
giving execution & effect
to it.
In the tyranny of which the Forest Monarchy-maker
Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under stories
no instruments: for the abolition of it, that same simple sheet
of paper was sufficient: the sub-ruling few, who had been the by
it being in part to that to the interest they added the
pieces required and sufficient for giving securing execution and effect
to it
16
Not so as to abolition
of sale & denial of
justice by Magna Charta
Widely different was and is the case the of in regard to the
Magna Charta: the declined and so quickly but subsequently
so erroneously supposed instrument of adequate security delay,
and sale and denial of justice. For its pushers and instrumenters
tyranny on this shape have the tyrants and instruments
appealed, ever receivable and at all times absolutely completly dependant
to Judges. Of those depended the who instead of be for fear
being suffering under it had been and continued to be the sharers
in the benefit such was the situation, also to the interest they
added the pain requisite and sufficient for giving
recourse and to the grievances instant of giving execution
and effect to the preludedly professedly alluded remedy.
Identifier: | JB/011/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-06-17 |
15-16 |
||
011 |
law amendment |
||
019 |
petition on dispatch court or review of j & hb? |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c4 / e5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
1829 |
|||
3716 |
|||