★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>8 Aug 1811 8</p> | |||
<head>Fallacies</head> | |||
<note>Ch. Classification</note> | |||
<p>8</p> | |||
<p>The affections — the imagination — the judgment —<lb/> | |||
these departments of the mind had been sufficiently<lb/> | |||
marked out <add>characterized</add> <add>distinguished</add>, and by their very names <add>and were sufficiently well known</add> to exempt<lb/> | |||
them from the need of looking <add>receiving</add> for other more<lb/> | |||
convenient appellations to a <add>dead and</add> foreign language.</p> | |||
<p>This at least it would have been stood <add>would have been the case</add> with them<lb/> | |||
if mere conception <add>conveyance of the ideas in question</add> <add>communication</add> had been the object.</p> | |||
<note>15<lb/> | |||
Arguments addressed<lb/> | |||
to 1. the affection<lb/> | |||
2. the imagination<lb/> | |||
3. the judgment —<lb/> | |||
for prominence<lb/> | |||
these denominations<lb/> | |||
stand not in need of<lb/> | |||
<sic>latin</sic>: — at least<lb/> | |||
for conception</note> | |||
<p>But besides that <del>by</del> <add>in the instance of</add> the term <del>affections</del> <hi rend="underline">the affections</hi><lb/> | |||
the class marked out by it was so extensive, as to<lb/> | |||
stand in need of ulterior division, so it was that<lb/> | |||
for retention on the part of the idea, and thence for<lb/> | |||
prominence on the part of the denomination <add>appellation</add>, <del>the</del><lb/> | |||
a <del>still</del> demand still seemed to present itself for the<lb/> | |||
use of the dead but nevertheless <add>still</add> <del><add>generally</add></del> <add>sufficiently</add> familiar language<lb/> | |||
still seemed to present itself.] and the example of<lb/> | |||
Locke sufficed at any rate to exempt <add>protect</add> <add><gap/></add> the whole<lb/> | |||
tribe of appellations <del><gap/></del> <add>formed</add> upon this principle from<lb/> | |||
every such charge as that of affectation and <add>or</add> useless<lb/> | |||
pedantry.</p> | |||
<note>16<lb/> | |||
But the class <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad<lb/> | |||
affectus</foreign></hi> requiring from<lb/> | |||
its extent ulterior<lb/> | |||
division, the above<lb/> | |||
divisions suffice not<lb/> | |||
thence for <hi rend="underline">retentive</hi><lb/> | |||
thought but upon the<lb/> | |||
whole to put all into<lb/> | |||
the dead yet sufficiently<lb/> | |||
familiar language<lb/> | |||
from the charge of<lb/> | |||
affectation <gap/> the<lb/> | |||
set of appellations<lb/> | |||
thus formed stand<lb/> | |||
exculpated by Locke.</note> | |||
<note>16<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/> | |||
Translated into English<lb/> | |||
these <sic>latin</sic> appellations<lb/> | |||
would be found too long-winded<lb/> | |||
to be serviceable</note> | |||
8 Aug 1811 8
Fallacies Ch. Classification
8
The affections — the imagination — the judgment —
these departments of the mind had been sufficiently
marked out characterized distinguished, and by their very names and were sufficiently well known to exempt
them from the need of looking receiving for other more
convenient appellations to a dead and foreign language.
This at least it would have been stood would have been the case with them
if mere conception conveyance of the ideas in question communication had been the object.
15
Arguments addressed
to 1. the affection
2. the imagination
3. the judgment —
for prominence
these denominations
stand not in need of
latin: — at least
for conception
But besides that by in the instance of the term affections the affections
the class marked out by it was so extensive, as to
stand in need of ulterior division, so it was that
for retention on the part of the idea, and thence for
prominence on the part of the denomination appellation, the
a still demand still seemed to present itself for the
use of the dead but nevertheless still generally sufficiently familiar language
still seemed to present itself.] and the example of
Locke sufficed at any rate to exempt protect the whole
tribe of appellations formed upon this principle from
every such charge as that of affectation and or useless
pedantry.
16
But the class ad
affectus requiring from
its extent ulterior
division, the above
divisions suffice not
thence for retentive
thought but upon the
whole to put all into
the dead yet sufficiently
familiar language
from the charge of
affectation the
set of appellations
thus formed stand
exculpated by Locke.
16(a)
Translated into English
these latin appellations
would be found too long-winded
to be serviceable
|
Identifier: | JB/104/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1811-08-08 |
15-16, 16a |
||
|
104 |
fallacies |
||
|
054 |
fallacies |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d8 / e8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman 1808 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1808 |
|||
|
34025 |
|||
