JB/169/241/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/169/241/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
I am admitting to all this while that of which<lb/>
the contrary is evident and undisputed &#x2014; that<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan had an intercourse with the enemy<lb/>
<add>How stands the fact?</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan's intercourse is with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone, and<lb/>
with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone only.  M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone's intercourse is<lb/>
with his brother in France: and it is the Brother<lb/>
and he only, if I <gap/> <gap/>ght, that has<lb/>
any <add>direct</add> intercourse with any  <del>bo</del> man who comes<lb/>
under the denomination of an enemy.  In the<lb/>
correspondence of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone, of whom I know <add>just</add> nothing,<lb/>
there is a disguise which in the correspondence<lb/>
of any friend of mine with such a country<lb/>
I should be <add>much concerned</add> <del>very sorry</del><add>much concerned</add> to see.  But in the communication<lb/>
made by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan, there is neither<lb/>
disguise nor mystery. Having something of an<lb/>
acquaintance, as it appears, with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone,<lb/>
who, <add>as it appears</add> takes advantage of the slightest acquaintance<lb/>
to display his political importance, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan,<lb/>
<add>observing, <add>as he thinks</add></add><add>among the French symptoms of a disposition to</add> <del>finding the French disposed to</del> take advice from any<lb/>
 





Revision as of 09:10, 25 March 2018

Click Here To Edit

I am admitting to all this while that of which
the contrary is evident and undisputed — that
Mr Vaughan had an intercourse with the enemy
How stands the fact? Mr Vaughan's intercourse is with Mr Stone, and
with Mr Stone only. Mr Stone's intercourse is
with his brother in France: and it is the Brother
and he only, if I ght, that has
any direct intercourse with any bo man who comes
under the denomination of an enemy. In the
correspondence of Mr Stone, of whom I know just nothing,
there is a disguise which in the correspondence
of any friend of mine with such a country
I should be much concerned very sorrymuch concerned to see. But in the communication
made by Mr Vaughan, there is neither
disguise nor mystery. Having something of an
acquaintance, as it appears, with Mr Stone,
who, as it appears takes advantage of the slightest acquaintance
to display his political importance, Mr Vaughan,
observing, <add>as he thinks</add>among the French symptoms of a disposition to finding the French disposed to take advice from any




Identifier: | JB/169/241/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

241

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57061

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in