★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Punishment distinguished and defined</head> | <head>Punishment distinguished and defined</head> | ||
<p>In the case of self-preservation, <add>and</add> self-<del>pres</del> defence, the<lb/><add>evil</add>may either be directly intentional or only obliquely<lb/>intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it<lb/>is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it<lb/>is inflicted <del>on</del> <add>for</add> the purpose of restraint, which is one<lb/>of the purposes of punishment.</p> | <note>Punishment distinguished<lb/>from<lb/>other kindred objects<lb/>in point of<lb/>intentionality.</note> | ||
<p>In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either<lb/>directly or only obliquely intentional: if however<lb/>it is directly intentional it is only for the<lb/>purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;<lb/>in general what evil it produced by measures<lb/>of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely <add>and negatively</add> intentional,<lb/>and is <del>gener</del> the effect of indolence on the<lb/>part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.<lb/>When it is directly intentional, the most<lb/>common case is for it to be | <p>In the case of self-preservation, <add>and</add> self-<del>pres</del> defence, the<lb/><add>evil</add> may either be directly intentional or only obliquely<lb/>intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it<lb/>is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it<lb/>is inflicted <del>on</del> <add>for</add> the purpose of restraint, which is one<lb/>of the purposes of punishment.</p> | ||
<p>In the cases of <add>combination, of</add>a personal obligation or a tax, as such it<lb/>is never any more than obliquely intentional.</p> | <p>In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either<lb/>directly or only obliquely intentional: if however<lb/>it is directly intentional it is only for the<lb/>purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;<lb/>in general what evil it produced by measures<lb/>of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely <add>and negatively</add> intentional,<lb/>and is <del>gener</del> the effect of indolence on the<lb/>part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.<lb/>When it is directly intentional, the most<lb/>common case is for it to be ultimately intentional<lb/>and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying<lb/>antipathy.</p> | ||
<p>In the cases of <add>combination, of</add> a personal obligation or a tax, as such it<lb/>is never any more than obliquely intentional.</p> | |||
<p><del>The</del></p> | <p><del>The</del></p> | ||
<p>In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion<lb/>the pain<add>or evil</add>that is produced<del>is</del>sometimes<add>is</add>all<lb/>of it<add>no more than</add>obliquely intentional, sometimes <add>it is in</add>part<lb/><del>of it is</del>directly intentional, and then it is of the<lb/>nature of punishment.</p> | <p>In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion<lb/>the pain<add>or evil</add>that is produced <del>is</del> sometimes <add>is</add> all<lb/>of it <add>no more than</add> obliquely intentional, sometimes <add>it is in</add> part<lb/><del>of it is</del> directly intentional, and then it is of the<lb/>nature of punishment.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Click Here To Edit
Punishment distinguished and defined
Punishment distinguished
from
other kindred objects
in point of
intentionality.
In the case of self-preservation, and self-pres defence, the
evil may either be directly intentional or only obliquely
intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it
is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it
is inflicted on for the purpose of restraint, which is one
of the purposes of punishment.
In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either
directly or only obliquely intentional: if however
it is directly intentional it is only for the
purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;
in general what evil it produced by measures
of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely and negatively intentional,
and is gener the effect of indolence on the
part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.
When it is directly intentional, the most
common case is for it to be ultimately intentional
and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying
antipathy.
In the cases of combination, of a personal obligation or a tax, as such it
is never any more than obliquely intentional.
The
In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion
the painor evilthat is produced is sometimes is all
of it no more than obliquely intentional, sometimes it is in part
of it is directly intentional, and then it is of the
nature of punishment.
Identifier: | JB/159/010/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
159 |
punishment |
||
010 |
punishment distinguished |
||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
[[page_numbering::d17 / f10[3] / f[1]04]] |
||
jeremy bentham |
s. lay |
||
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
53833 |
|||