JB/159/010/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/010/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Punishment distinguished and defined</head>
<head>Punishment distinguished and defined</head>
<p>In the case of self-preservation, <add>and</add> self-<del>pres</del> defence, the<lb/><add>evil</add>may either be directly intentional or only obliquely<lb/>intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it<lb/>is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it<lb/>is inflicted <del>on</del> <add>for</add> the purpose of restraint, which is one<lb/>of the purposes of punishment.</p>
<note>Punishment distinguished<lb/>from<lb/>other kindred objects<lb/>in point of<lb/>intentionality.</note>
<p>In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either<lb/>directly or only obliquely intentional: if however<lb/>it is directly intentional it is only for the<lb/>purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;<lb/>in general what evil it produced by measures<lb/>of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely <add>and negatively</add> intentional,<lb/>and is <del>gener</del> the effect of indolence on the<lb/>part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.<lb/>When it is directly intentional, the most<lb/>common case is for it to be ? intentional<lb/>and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying<lb/>antipathy.</p>
<p>In the case of self-preservation, <add>and</add> self-<del>pres</del> defence, the<lb/><add>evil</add> may either be directly intentional or only obliquely<lb/>intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it<lb/>is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it<lb/>is inflicted <del>on</del> <add>for</add> the purpose of restraint, which is one<lb/>of the purposes of punishment.</p>
<p>In the cases of <add>combination, of</add>a personal obligation or a tax, as such it<lb/>is never any more than obliquely intentional.</p>
<p>In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either<lb/>directly or only obliquely intentional: if however<lb/>it is directly intentional it is only for the<lb/>purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;<lb/>in general what evil it produced by measures<lb/>of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely <add>and negatively</add> intentional,<lb/>and is <del>gener</del> the effect of indolence on the<lb/>part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.<lb/>When it is directly intentional, the most<lb/>common case is for it to be ultimately intentional<lb/>and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying<lb/>antipathy.</p>
<p>In the cases of <add>combination, of</add> a personal obligation or a tax, as such it<lb/>is never any more than obliquely intentional.</p>
<p><del>The</del></p>
<p><del>The</del></p>
<p>In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion<lb/>the pain<add>or evil</add>that is produced<del>is</del>sometimes<add>is</add>all<lb/>of it<add>no more than</add>obliquely intentional, sometimes <add>it is in</add>part<lb/><del>of it is</del>directly intentional, and then it is of the<lb/>nature of punishment.</p>
<p>In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion<lb/>the pain<add>or evil</add>that is produced <del>is</del> sometimes <add>is</add> all<lb/>of it <add>no more than</add> obliquely intentional, sometimes <add>it is in</add> part<lb/><del>of it is</del> directly intentional, and then it is of the<lb/>nature of punishment.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:30, 27 March 2018

Click Here To Edit Punishment distinguished and defined Punishment distinguished
from
other kindred objects
in point of
intentionality.

In the case of self-preservation, and self-pres defence, the
evil may either be directly intentional or only obliquely
intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it
is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it
is inflicted on for the purpose of restraint, which is one
of the purposes of punishment.

In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either
directly or only obliquely intentional: if however
it is directly intentional it is only for the
purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;
in general what evil it produced by measures
of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely and negatively intentional,
and is gener the effect of indolence on the
part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.
When it is directly intentional, the most
common case is for it to be ultimately intentional
and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying
antipathy.

In the cases of combination, of a personal obligation or a tax, as such it
is never any more than obliquely intentional.

The

In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion
the painor evilthat is produced is sometimes is all
of it no more than obliquely intentional, sometimes it is in part
of it is directly intentional, and then it is of the
nature of punishment.



Identifier: | JB/159/010/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

punishment distinguished

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::d17 / f10[3] / f[1]04]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

s. lay

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53833

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in