★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 July 21 <note>10</note><!-- pencil number --></p> <head>Review of Reformists</head> <p> <note>1. <sic>Compleat</sic> and <gap/> Reformists<lb/> theories and <gap/><lb/> <foreign>quere</foreign> by J.B. above.</note> </p> <p> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> 17 Aug Superseded but<lb/> Consultable</p> <p> Two | <p> 1829 July 21 <note>10</note><!-- pencil number --></p> <head>Review of Reformists</head> <p> <note>1. <sic>Compleat</sic> and <gap/> Reformists<lb/> theories and <gap/><lb/> <foreign>quere</foreign> by J.B. above.</note> </p> <p> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> 17 <sic>Aug</sic> Superseded but<lb/> Consultable</p> <p> Two tasks <add> <gap/></add> then now of which every man is competent,<lb/> laying down laws, and finding fault with laws.<lb/> laying down laws provided that no reasons for them are required:<lb/> finding faults with laws provided that no reason for<lb/> the fault so found nor remedy when the alleged faults<lb/> are real ones. Yes, every man competent: add to which<lb/> <add> may be added</add> and every woman whether in her <gap/> as at the close of her<lb/> <unclear>dotage</unclear>.</p> <p> With Jeremy Bentham from first to last it has been<lb/> an inviolable rule never to <del><gap/></del> point out either abuse or imperfection <lb/> but with a view to, and for the sake and purpose<lb/> of, remedy.</p> <p> Thus it is <del>that</del> in his proposed Petition for Justice<lb/> In the statement part are exposed the imperfections, utmost<lb/> <gap/>: in the <gap/> part the principle of a proposed<lb/> <unclear>commensurate</unclear> remedy. In his Dispatch Court Bill, a <gap/><lb/> cause of <gap/> <del> no exp</del> a proposed <gap/><lb/> <gap/>, brought in such a stock of punishments, as to be<lb/> ripe for conversion into Act of Parliament</p> <p>Not <del> only in <gap/></del> <add>only</add> more useful and <gap/><lb/> in substance is the law in its existing state, than in its form <lb/> and profession <add> method</add> <gap/> it <gap/> as well in the Mr Bentham's <lb/> Despatch Court Bill <gap/> a model. This one matter all <add> For him this whole not long</add><lb/> of free choice but of necessity: <add> without a corresponding change in the <gap/></add> remedy sort in the disorder required,<lb/> the disorder could not receive.</p> <!-- pencil line across the page --> <p> <note>Brougham</note></p> <p> Examiner, July 25, 1829<lb/> Extract from.</p> <p> "In an article in the <hi rend="underline">Edinburgh Review</hi>, Mr Brougham<lb/> asserted that some of the demands on the time and labour of<lb/> a man of Business in any of the active walks of life<lb/> were incompatible with the discharge of his senatorial<lb/> duties. The opinion amply denotes the <del>ad</del>vice. When the first man<lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> in the House of Commons<lb/> proclaims such a<lb/> dogma, what must<lb/> be the practice of<lb/> the herd?"</p> | ||
1829 July 21 10
Review of Reformists
1. Compleat and Reformists
theories and
quere by J.B. above.
17 Aug Superseded but
Consultable
Two tasks then now of which every man is competent,
laying down laws, and finding fault with laws.
laying down laws provided that no reasons for them are required:
finding faults with laws provided that no reason for
the fault so found nor remedy when the alleged faults
are real ones. Yes, every man competent: add to which
may be added and every woman whether in her as at the close of her
dotage.
With Jeremy Bentham from first to last it has been
an inviolable rule never to point out either abuse or imperfection
but with a view to, and for the sake and purpose
of, remedy.
Thus it is that in his proposed Petition for Justice
In the statement part are exposed the imperfections, utmost
: in the part the principle of a proposed
commensurate remedy. In his Dispatch Court Bill, a
cause of no exp a proposed
, brought in such a stock of punishments, as to be
ripe for conversion into Act of Parliament
Not only in only more useful and
in substance is the law in its existing state, than in its form
and profession method it as well in the Mr Bentham's
Despatch Court Bill a model. This one matter all For him this whole not long
of free choice but of necessity: without a corresponding change in the remedy sort in the disorder required,
the disorder could not receive.
Brougham
Examiner, July 25, 1829
Extract from.
"In an article in the Edinburgh Review, Mr Brougham
asserted that some of the demands on the time and labour of
a man of Business in any of the active walks of life
were incompatible with the discharge of his senatorial
duties. The opinion amply denotes the advice. When the first man
in the House of Commons
proclaims such a
dogma, what must
be the practice of
the herd?"
|
Identifier: | JB/011/050/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-07-21 |
|||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
050 |
|||
|
001 |
examiner, july 28, 1829 / extract from |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"17 aug superseded but consultable" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
3747 |
||
