JB/104/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/013/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1821 Feb. 15</p>
<head>Fallacies Introduction or Preface.</head>
<note>Introd or Preface<lb/>
1. Gen<gap/></note>
 
<p>2</p>
<note>History of Fallacies</note>
 
<p>Not that in all these two thousand years additions<lb/>
to this branch of art and science have been altogether wanting<lb/>
But <del>such as</del> they are characterized such of them as have<lb/>
presented themselves to my view they stand characterized by<lb/>
the following circumstances. 1 They have not <del>been</del> found admittance<lb/>
into those seats and sources of instruction to <add>to objects of</add> which<lb/>
they would have been so incontrovertibly congenial <add>well adapted</add>: To the<lb/>
head and denomination of Logic one of them alone namely<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del> that for which the public is indebted to the lot &#x2014; Gerard<lb/>
Hamilton, and <add>this</add> which is of the freshest date: Rhetoric <add>Rhetoric</add><lb/>
is the head <add>name</add> <add>given to the</add> <add>branch of art and science</add> to which the <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <add>entire?</add> work &#x2014; <add>namely</add> that which<lb/>
bears the name of <unclear>Vissius</unclear>, is referred &#x2014; But though in<lb/>
this <del><gap/></del> last matter though earliest existing instance <hi rend="underline">Rhetoric</hi> <add>Rhetoric</add><lb/>
is the name affixed <add>employed</add>, Logic might of the matter be considered<lb/>
in a certain point of view have without impropriety<lb/>
been employed. <del>Logic</del> By Logic taken at <unclear>large</unclear><lb/>
may be understood the art of applying to best advantage<lb/>
to the purpose of discourse the faculty of discourse. Of<lb/>
this all comprehensive art and science Rhetoric may<lb/>
be considered as constituting a branch. Rhetoric being the<lb/>
art of making application of that faculty, in so far as<lb/>
deception produced by misrepresentation is the object in<lb/>
view./</p>
 
<p>This is the object pursued without disguise by both<lb/>
these <unclear>ingenious ones</unclear>: this is what <add>that</add> <sic>antient</sic> disguise they in<lb/>
these several works professed to teach.</p>
 





Revision as of 09:46, 19 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

1821 Feb. 15

Fallacies Introduction or Preface. Introd or Preface
1. Gen

2

History of Fallacies

Not that in all these two thousand years additions
to this branch of art and science have been altogether wanting
But such as they are characterized such of them as have
presented themselves to my view they stand characterized by
the following circumstances. 1 They have not been found admittance
into those seats and sources of instruction to to objects of which
they would have been so incontrovertibly congenial well adapted: To the
head and denomination of Logic one of them alone namely
that for which the public is indebted to the lot — Gerard
Hamilton, and this which is of the freshest date: Rhetoric Rhetoric
is the head name given to the branch of art and science to which the entire? work — namely that which
bears the name of Vissius, is referred — But though in
this last matter though earliest existing instance Rhetoric Rhetoric
is the name affixed employed, Logic might of the matter be considered
in a certain point of view have without impropriety
been employed. Logic By Logic taken at large
may be understood the art of applying to best advantage
to the purpose of discourse the faculty of discourse. Of
this all comprehensive art and science Rhetoric may
be considered as constituting a branch. Rhetoric being the
art of making application of that faculty, in so far as
deception produced by misrepresentation is the object in
view./

This is the object pursued without disguise by both
these ingenious ones: this is what that antient disguise they in
these several works professed to teach.




Identifier: | JB/104/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1821-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

introduction or preface

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

33984

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in