JB/010/009/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/010/009/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TCMemoire (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>the Common Law); &#x2014; In the Case of <hi rend="underline">The King</hi><lb/>
v <hi rend="underline">Carlisle</hi>, the Judges declared &#x2014; "That no statutable<lb/>
"Remedies took away, unless by express words, or by<lb/>
"clear and manifest intention, the Principles<lb/>
"of the Common Law. &#x2014; The Remedies given by<lb/>
"such statutes were <hi rend="underline">accumulative, and not</hi><lb/>
"<hi rend="underline">abrogatory</hi>. In fact, this was a settled principle,<lb/>
"to be found in all the Books most commonly<lb/>
"read." &#x2014; See the <hi rend="underline">Times</hi> <hi rend="underline">17. Nov: 1819</hi>. and <hi rend="underline">Barnes</hi> and<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Aldersons</hi> Reports, <hi rend="underline">K.13</hi>. Vol:<hi rend="underline">3</hi>. Part <hi rend="underline">1</hi>.P.<hi rend="underline">161</hi>. <hi rend="underline">Mich.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Term. 1819</hi>.</p>


<p>Earnestly requesting the favour of<lb/>
your opinion,<lb/>
I remain,<lb/>
Sir, - With great respect,<lb/>
Your most Red.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Lble Servt<lb/>
Benj..<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> C. Griffinhoofe<lb/>
8. New Ormond Street.</p>


<p>To<lb/>
Jeremy Bentham Esqr<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">P.S./</hi> In the Case of Warden and Minor Canons of S.<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Pauls</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 05:43, 22 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

the Common Law); — In the Case of The King
v Carlisle, the Judges declared — "That no statutable
"Remedies took away, unless by express words, or by
"clear and manifest intention, the Principles
"of the Common Law. — The Remedies given by
"such statutes were accumulative, and not
"abrogatory. In fact, this was a settled principle,
"to be found in all the Books most commonly
"read." — See the Times 17. Nov: 1819. and Barnes and
Aldersons Reports, K.13. Vol:3. Part 1.P.161. Mich.<hi rend="superscript">s Term. 1819</hi>.

Earnestly requesting the favour of
your opinion,
I remain,
Sir, - With great respect,
Your most Red.s Lble Servt
Benj..n C. Griffinhoofe
8. New Ormond Street.

To
Jeremy Bentham Esqr
P.S./ In the Case of Warden and Minor Canons of S.t Pauls



Identifier: | JB/010/009/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10.

Date_1

1820-04-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

010

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

009

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

see morning chron. 21 april 1820

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

benjamin cooke griffinhoofe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham; richard doane

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 2586, vol. 9

ID Number

3445

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in