★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 Aug. 4</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p> <del>Beginning</del> J.B.<lb/>Remedies<lb/> Judicature accessible<lb/> 44<lb/> Summary procedure<lb/> more conclusive than<lb/> regular to <gap/><lb/> of decision</note> </p> <p> <add><del> To the summary forms be substitute<lb/> in <gap/> the <gap/>: <gap/> <add><gap/></add> it of that <gap/> scale<lb/> quality of <gap/> <Add>with</add> which the forgetting system last <gap/> it</del></add></p> <p> Taking then both in hand and taking them <add>both<a/add> to <gap/><lb/> as a Watchmaker does a discordant watch, one artist<lb/> does that an end by the appellations so beloved the true <lb/>characters were reversed. <add>in</add> At least as high a proportion as<lb/> it is <gap/> to the collateral as <add> that which is called summary</add> <del>an</del> <gap/> who to the main<lb/> <del>and</del> end and ends of justice. Not more conducive is it<lb/> to <gap/> of decision than to <gap/>: not more <lb/> consequences <add> preeminent in<add>superior</add> for cheapness than <add>as</add> for goodness: that it<lb/> <del>had</del> let in <del>m</del> demands in multitude which the fee gathering<lb/> system would have excluded, and then substituted <gap/> <lb/> and then accidents <gap/> <gap/> of desire, in cases<lb/> in which under the regular system, through non-commencement<lb/> <hi rend="underline"><sic>nondecision </sic></hi> would have had place.</p> <p><note>45<lb/> Practical conclusion<lb/> Substitute summary<lb/> throughout to regular.</note> </p> <p> What then says Bentham is <add>ought</add> to be done? Neither more <add> exactly this</add><lb/> not less than this. <del> I c</del> Abolish throughout the regular system,<lb/> substitute to it throughout the summary system. And what is<lb/> this same summary system? What but the domestic system:<lb/> that same system which every Master of a family <del>practices</del> <add> acts upon</add> <lb/> in his own family, though perhaps as <foreign>Monsieur</foreign> <unclear>Joudan </unclear><lb/> kept talking proves — without knowing it. Some little <gap/><lb/> <gap/> he found <gap/> to it, <gap/> <gap/> by its <lb/> vicinity to the fee-gathering system: this he trusted <gap/> <gap/><lb/> and they reduced <add> purified it</add> to the state of the <gap/></p> <p> <note> Powers necessary few<lb/> besides those possessed<lb/> by domestic Judicature</note> </p> <p> Powers on fees <del>in addition</del> over sales or <gap/><lb/> to them which a father of a family has over children and<lb/> servants, these of course, he <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> to it<lb/> could not but be necessary: what these are the <add> any</add> reader<lb/> thinks it worth his while may see <add> may be seen>add> in the abovementioned Petitions<lb/> to which for steadiness it is <gap/> this <gap/> should be <gap/><lb/> made neither for reprinting them for for <gap/> of them can<lb/> space be here spared. So much for the inaccessibility of Judicature.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1829 Aug. 4
Reformists reviewed
Beginning J.B.
Remedies
Judicature accessible
44
Summary procedure
more conclusive than
regular to
of decision</note>
To the summary forms be substitute it of that scale
in the : <add>
quality of with which the forgetting system last it</add>
Taking then both in hand and taking them both<a/add> to
as a Watchmaker does a discordant watch, one artist
does that an end by the appellations so beloved the true
characters were reversed. <add>in At least as high a proportion as
it is to the collateral as that which is called summary an who to the main
and end and ends of justice. Not more conducive is it
to of decision than to : not more
consequences preeminent in<add>superior for cheapness than as for goodness: that it
had let in m demands in multitude which the fee gathering
system would have excluded, and then substituted
and then accidents of desire, in cases
in which under the regular system, through non-commencement
nondecision would have had place.
45
Practical conclusion
Substitute summary
throughout to regular.
What then says Bentham is ought to be done? Neither more exactly this
not less than this. I c Abolish throughout the regular system,
substitute to it throughout the summary system. And what is
this same summary system? What but the domestic system:
that same system which every Master of a family practices acts upon
in his own family, though perhaps as Monsieur Joudan
kept talking proves — without knowing it. Some little
he found to it, by its
vicinity to the fee-gathering system: this he trusted
and they reduced purified it to the state of the
Powers necessary few
besides those possessed
by domestic Judicature
Powers on fees in addition over sales or
to them which a father of a family has over children and
servants, these of course, he it to it
could not but be necessary: what these are the any reader
thinks it worth his while may see <add> may be seen>add> in the abovementioned Petitions
to which for steadiness it is this should be
made neither for reprinting them for for of them can
space be here spared. So much for the inaccessibility of Judicature.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/068/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-04 |
44-46 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
068 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e17 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3765 |
|||
