JB/011/070/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/070/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 June 18 <note> <!-- in pencil --> 1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></note></p> <head> Review of Bullen &amp; Brougham</head> <p><note><!-- in pencil --> Beginning?<lb/> <!-- overwrites words in pencil --> II Semi-reformists<lb/> <del>3<lb/> 2. Half Reformists</del></note></p> <p> <!-- numbers in pencil --> 2 (2)<lb/> <add> hold those who think to join reputation<lb/> to unlimited profit &#x2014; or  <gap/><lb/> Brougham &amp;c</add> </p> <p> So much for the thorough and sincere reformists, now for <add>as to</add> the half-reformists.<lb/> Among <add>For existing</add> lawyers <gap/> through and given refunds may be<lb/> content perhaps by <add> any employment be given to </add> the fingers of one hand, <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add> to</add> those of both hands<lb/> assuredly one by those of hand and foot.  For <gap/> those whom fate is <lb/>into half reforming class employment may <add> might</add> <gap/> to give in to the law <!-- continues in margin -->of the land, for always<lb/> supposing this for higher <lb/> class of <gap/>, a <lb/> certain degree of boldness<lb/> be supposed.</p> <p> Sharers in the <gap/> <add><unclear>blindness</unclear></add> establishment and regulated by<lb/> the fee-gathering system are his breed of feebroker &#x2014; the affront <gap/><lb/> the professional lawyer</p> <p> For the extinction <add> abolition</add> of the fee gathering system to the <sic>compleat</sic><lb/> substitution of payment by salary to payment by fee no objection would<lb/> <del> by many of the most</del> <add> be raised</add> &#x2014; may then one of the most enlightened<lb/> men by whom no objection would be made.  On the contrary in<lb/> the particular and so for they not who would with gladness behold<lb/> the establishment of reform, but are in bond in the demands they<lb/> make for it.  Why? upon what principle?  Upon the <foreign> <hi rend="underline">Quo <gap/></hi> </foreign><lb/> upon the <gap/> judicature principle.  Under the existing system, as<lb/> <gap/> shows at present, those parts of the substance of <gap/><lb/> which consistently calls either <gap/> <add> <gap/> <gap/> of their existence</add> is capable of being employed<lb/> in <gap/> <gap/> is divided in proportion <del>not</del> perhaps not<lb/> widely different <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> between the <del>pro</del> official and the professional hand,<lb/> Say for arguments sake <add> <gap/> of argument</add> in equal portions.  Will these <del>the greater the</del><lb/> <del><gap/></del> extinguish the portion <add>half<add> mass</add> at present employed in gorging the<lb/> <del>professional</del> <add> official</add> stomach, the whole of the <gap/> "<hi rend="underline">Business mass</hi>, and<lb/> find or may find its way out the professional ones.  <del><gap/></del>  In<lb/> making exact and minute calculation time and labour could be economically<lb/> employed: but upon a <del>right</del> rigid view and result<lb/> <gap/> can all seeds of the <gap/> <gap/> <sic>expence</sic> <add> it being the half</add> which give <gap/><lb/> official perfect, the result of power of power capable of <unclear>numbering sixty</unclear><lb/> and in a word the total number of suits would <add> will</add> be doubled &#x2014; Justice can be kept <unclear>defenceless</unclear>.</p> <!-- line drawn across the page --> <p> + See Closing Report Report analysis of the <sic>expence</sic> of <unclear>equal</unclear> ends</p>  
<p> 1829 June 18 <note> <!-- in pencil --> 1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></note></p> <head> Review of Bullen &amp; Brougham</head> <p><note><!-- in pencil --> Beginning?<lb/> <!-- overwrites words in pencil --> II Semi-reformists<lb/> <del>3<lb/> 2. Half Reformists</del></note></p> <p> <!-- numbers in pencil --> 2 (2)<lb/> <add> hold those who think to join reputation<lb/> to unlimited profit &#x2014; or  <gap/><lb/> Brougham &amp;c</add> </p> <p> So much for the thorough and sincere reformists, now for <add>as to</add> the half-reformists.<lb/> Among <add>For existing</add> lawyers <gap/> through and <gap/> refunds may be<lb/> content perhaps by <add> any employment be given to </add> the fingers of one hand, <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add> to</add> those of both hands<lb/> assuredly one by those of hand and foot.  For counting those whose plan is <lb/>into half reforming class employment may <add> might</add> perhaps be to given into the law <!-- continues in margin -->of the land, for always<lb/> supposing this for higher <lb/> class of <gap/>, a <lb/> certain degree of boldness<lb/> be supposed.</p> <p> Sharers in the <gap/> <add><unclear>blindness</unclear></add> establishment and regulated by<lb/> the fee-gathering system are his breed of feebroker &#x2014; the efficient one<lb/> the professional lawyer</p> <p> For the extinction <add> abolition</add> of the fee gathering system to the <sic>compleat</sic><lb/> substitution of payment by salary to payment by fee no objection would<lb/> <del> by many of the most</del> <add> be raised</add> &#x2014; may then one of the most enlightened<lb/> men by whom no objection would be made.  On the contrary in<lb/> the particular and so for they not who would with gladness behold<lb/> the establishment of reform, but are in bond in the demands they<lb/> make for it.  Why? upon what principle?  Upon the <foreign> <hi rend="underline">Quo <gap/></hi> </foreign><lb/> upon the <unclear>hooligan</unclear> judicature principle.  Under the existing system, as<lb/> <gap/> shows at present, those parts of the substance of <gap/><lb/> which consistently calls either their existence <add> within <gap/> of their existence</add> is capable of being employed<lb/> in <unclear>late</unclear> <gap/> is divided in proportion <del>not</del> perhaps not<lb/> widely different <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> between the <del>pro</del> official and the professional hand,<lb/> Say for arguments sake <add> <gap/> of argument</add> in equal portions.  Will these <del>the greater the</del><lb/> <del><gap/></del> extinguish the portion <add>half<add> mass</add> at present employed in gorging the<lb/> <del>professional</del> <add> official</add> stomach, the whole of the <gap/> "<hi rend="underline">Business mass</hi>, and<lb/> finds or may find its way out the professional ones.  <del><gap/></del>  In<lb/> making exact and minute calculation time and labour could be economically<lb/> employed: but upon a <del>right</del> rigid view and result<lb/> <gap/> can all seeds of that <gap/> <gap/> the <sic>expence</sic> <add> it being the half</add> which goes into<lb/> official pockets, the result of power of power capable of <unclear>numbering sixty</unclear><lb/> and in a word the total number of suits would <add> will</add> be doubled &#x2014; Justice can be kept <unclear>defenceless</unclear>.</p> <!-- line drawn across the page --> <p> + See Closing Report Report analysis of the <sic>expence</sic> of a <unclear>equal</unclear> ends</p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:47, 6 May 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 18 1o

Review of Bullen & Brougham

Beginning?
II Semi-reformists
3
2. Half Reformists

2 (2)
hold those who think to join reputation
to unlimited profit — or
Brougham &c

So much for the thorough and sincere reformists, now for as to the half-reformists.
Among For existing lawyers through and refunds may be
content perhaps by any employment be given to the fingers of one hand, to those of both hands
assuredly one by those of hand and foot. For counting those whose plan is
into half reforming class employment may might perhaps be to given into the law of the land, for always
supposing this for higher
class of , a
certain degree of boldness
be supposed.

Sharers in the blindness establishment and regulated by
the fee-gathering system are his breed of feebroker — the efficient one
the professional lawyer

For the extinction abolition of the fee gathering system to the compleat
substitution of payment by salary to payment by fee no objection would
by many of the most be raised — may then one of the most enlightened
men by whom no objection would be made. On the contrary in
the particular and so for they not who would with gladness behold
the establishment of reform, but are in bond in the demands they
make for it. Why? upon what principle? Upon the Quo
upon the hooligan judicature principle. Under the existing system, as
shows at present, those parts of the substance of
which consistently calls either their existence within of their existence is capable of being employed
in late is divided in proportion not perhaps not
widely different + between the pro official and the professional hand,
Say for arguments sake of argument in equal portions. Will these the greater the
extinguish the portion half<add> mass at present employed in gorging the
professional official stomach, the whole of the "Business mass, and
finds or may find its way out the professional ones. In
making exact and minute calculation time and labour could be economically
employed: but upon a right rigid view and result
can all seeds of that the expence it being the half which goes into
official pockets, the result of power of power capable of numbering sixty
and in a word the total number of suits would will be doubled — Justice can be kept defenceless.

+ See Closing Report Report analysis of the expence of a equal ends



Identifier: | JB/011/070/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-06-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

070

Info in main headings field

review of bentham & brougham

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3767

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in