★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 Aug. 14</p> <head>Reformists classed</head> <p> <!-- in pencil --> (5 <note> Beginning<lb/> Reformists who</note></p> <p><note><add>1. Earliest and</add><lb/> <del>1. At the | <p> 1829 Aug. 14</p> <head>Reformists classed</head> <p> <!-- in pencil --> (5 <note> Beginning<lb/> Reformists who</note></p> <p><note><add>1. Earliest and</add><lb/> <del>1. At the heart</del><lb/> heartiest of Reformists<lb/> J.B. <hi rend="superscript">r</hi></note></p> <p> The law is all perfect. <gap/> <gap/> <add> <unclear>at passed</unclear></add> so it is.</p> <p><note><del>J.B.</del> In the first rank<lb/> of reformists — the<lb/> thorough reformists</note></p> <p>Indisputably first in rank as well as first in <gap/> at the head<lb/> of the class of thorough and semi-reformists will be plain of course <add>The <gap/> then is as it ought to be. like <gap/></add><lb/>by every man <add> in the <gap/> Kingdom</add> to whom the question is put the vacant sage <add> ought to be</add> the<lb/>man of legislaton or be his secretary the extent the state of legislator <add> A great deal is as it ought not to be</add><lb/> <gap/> he has not often here been called, the Noter of legislation<lb/> as of late he has been called and by <add> <gap/> <gap/>. </add> he was <gap/> of judges been <add> This man is either</add><lb/> called, the fount of whose labours in the vineyard of legislation <gap/> <add> so <gap/> is in one person</add><lb/> can not in all its <gap/> at so early and at as<lb/> <unclear>proved</unclear> of the year 1776.</p> <p><note>JB at the head<lb/> of the order</note></p> <p> Class the Reformists. Order 1. Thorough-reformists</p> <p> At the head and front of this order we place<lb/> without <add>any</add> the hard fear of dispute — <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add> exists then in England that same</add><lb/> <add> individual to whom</add> as the mention of that <del> <gap/></del> name can be necessary <gap/><lb/> to <sic>compleat</sic> <del><gap/> </del> the <gap/> we shall <unclear>know</unclear><lb/> <unclear>instead</unclear> this same name — Jeremy Bentham .<lb/> First of all, <add> Law</add> reformers — first of all thorough <add>Law</add> reformers<lb/> is he <del>not only</del> in every sense in every order —in<lb/> the order of <del>these</del> priority as to these — <add> as well as</add> in the order of<lb/> magnitude as to quantity, <del>and</del> in any extent of service.</p> <p> In the year 1776 it was: never more than<lb/> these years beyond half a century ago that the extent<lb/> of his work entitled A Fragment in Government , prefaced<lb/> by a "Critique on Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries<lb/> made its first appearance</p> | ||
1829 Aug. 14
Reformists classed
(5 Beginning
Reformists who
1. Earliest and
1. At the heart
heartiest of Reformists
J.B. r
The law is all perfect. at passed so it is.
J.B. In the first rank
of reformists — the
thorough reformists
Indisputably first in rank as well as first in at the head
of the class of thorough and semi-reformists will be plain of course The then is as it ought to be. like
by every man in the Kingdom to whom the question is put the vacant sage ought to be the
man of legislaton or be his secretary the extent the state of legislator A great deal is as it ought not to be
he has not often here been called, the Noter of legislation
as of late he has been called and by . he was of judges been This man is either
called, the fount of whose labours in the vineyard of legislation so is in one person
can not in all its at so early and at as
proved of the year 1776.
JB at the head
of the order
Class the Reformists. Order 1. Thorough-reformists
At the head and front of this order we place
without any the hard fear of dispute — exists then in England that same
individual to whom as the mention of that name can be necessary
to compleat the we shall know
instead this same name — Jeremy Bentham .
First of all, Law reformers — first of all thorough Law reformers
is he not only in every sense in every order —in
the order of these priority as to these — as well as in the order of
magnitude as to quantity, and in any extent of service.
In the year 1776 it was: never more than
these years beyond half a century ago that the extent
of his work entitled A Fragment in Government , prefaced
by a "Critique on Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries
made its first appearance
|
Identifier: | JB/011/080/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-14 |
not numbered |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
080 |
reformists classed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
e5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
3777 |
|||
