JB/104/046/001

Click Here To Edit

14 July 1810 July 14 4

Fallacies 1 Generalia
Ch. 1.

3

§.2. Fallacies classed

Ch. 7. Anti-rational arguments or fallacies.

1. The No-Nineties, Practical , or Blend
argument.

[2. The Improvement-hater's Profligate's argument]

[3. The self-contradicting argument.]

In those such instances, in which, after the nature
explanation has been given of the nature of the
fallacy, any thing remains that can contribute
to the exposure of it, observations under the head
of exposure are accordingly given.

8
Where after explanation
any
thing has remained
to be done in the way
of exposure, exposure
has been given under
a head so intituled:
if not, exemplification
is given
in lieu of exposure.

But in many instances, after when in addition to the
indication given by intimation afforded by the general term fallacy
it was a simple explan the nature of the
fallacy had been simply merely explained, it what appears
sufficiently evident is nothing that from any
thing that can be added for the purpose of exposure
the irrelevancy of it can n inefficiency of it in
the character of a rational argument can not be
placed on any clearer or stronger ground. In these
cases the head of exposure is omitted, and in lieu
of it examples are given [of classes] of cases in
in which the fallacy in question has been in use
to be employed.

Identifier: | JB/104/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.
Date_1	1810-07-14	Marginal Summary Numbering	8
Box	104	Main Headings	fallacies
Folio number	046	Info in main headings field	fallacies
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d4 / e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	34017
Box Contents