JB/067/332/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/067/332/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1826. May 17.<lb/>5<head>Penal Code</head><lb/><note>Ch. VI. Offences affect<add>g</add> use of prop.<lb/>§. 10. Stealing</note><p>multitude.</p><p>The scale of punishment has been spoken of as commencing<lb/>at absolute impunity, and not ending anywhere<lb/>short of death. Extensive in no small degree<lb/>is the case of absolute impunity; for its extent is<lb/>that of the whole territory of the state. Anything<lb/>which, at the time of its being stolen, was in a<lb/>state of adhesion to the earth, was found to be<lb/>thereby rendered incapable of being stolen. Being<lb/>fixed to the <add>realty</add> <del><gap/></del>, it had upon it a <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi><lb/>that was the end of the realty. (<gap/> was the word &#x2014;<lb/>for under English common law were regarded as<lb/>constituting reason or improved substitutes to it).<lb/>This was sufficient proof that either the thing<lb/>was not capable of being stolen or supposing it<lb/>was stolen, it was not reasonable or proper that<lb/>the thief should be punished for stealing it.</p>





Revision as of 16:13, 7 June 2018

Click Here To Edit

1826. May 17.
5Penal Code
Ch. VI. Offences affectg use of prop.
§. 10. Stealing

multitude.

The scale of punishment has been spoken of as commencing
at absolute impunity, and not ending anywhere
short of death. Extensive in no small degree
is the case of absolute impunity; for its extent is
that of the whole territory of the state. Anything
which, at the time of its being stolen, was in a
state of adhesion to the earth, was found to be
thereby rendered incapable of being stolen. Being
fixed to the realty , it had upon it a
that was the end of the realty. ( was the word —
for under English common law were regarded as
constituting reason or improved substitutes to it).
This was sufficient proof that either the thing
was not capable of being stolen or supposing it
was stolen, it was not reasonable or proper that
the thief should be punished for stealing it.




Identifier: | JB/067/332/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 67.

Date_1

1826-05-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

067

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

332

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a5

Penner

john neal

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

22165

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in