JB/013/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/013/019/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Hanatori71 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1820 Sept 20</p>
<p>An Answer to Mason</p>
<p>Many Most of the other articles that you will find in that vast mass<lb/>
that your shelves are about to be loaded with have the same tenden-<lb/>
cy: &#x2014; the fragment on evidence, "I catch Reform" on the subject of<lb/>
Judicial Establishment and Procedure, "Swear not at all", on the<lb/>
subject of evidence and a variety of other subjects, "Parlamentary<lb/>
Reform Catechism" and "Bentham's Radical Reform Bill" on the<lb/>
subject of National Representation &amp;c &amp;c "Church of Englandism<lb/>
examined" on the subject of Ecclesiastical Establishment &amp;c &amp;c. Of all<lb/>
these the work on Judicial Establishment, is that, which I should<lb/>
expect to find would afford you most satisfaction. It has now<lb/>
variety in it: it abounds more on matters of fact and arguments in<lb/>
detail. It has more spirit than any other of my works: it was<lb/>
written in the age of vejucer of age and under the excitement produced by<lb/>
hope. But why need I refer you to all or any of these works<lb/>
which are all new to you, throughout that work by Dumont which<lb/>
introduced you to my acquaintance, do you not see the dissi-<lb/>
militude of my notions on Law to the great mass of former no-<lb/>
tions and at the same time the badness of that same great<lb/>
mass of badness in a Body of Laws consists in its unconden-<lb/>
civeness to the greatest happiness of the greatest number of<lb/>
those who are governed by these: that all comprehensive end<lb/>
and to the four subordinate ends comprehended in it voj<lb/>
subsistence, abundance, security, and equality, as far as compati- con<lb/>
ble existent. with reality.</p>
<p>"Avard nul egard. Dans un code code de lois par l'Espagne dans<lb/>
son etat actuel il ne faut" avoir nul egard a la legislation des <lb/>
"peuples anciens, ni aux codes adoptés chez les principales nati-<lb/>
"-ons de l'Europe". Such is the theorem you in ths occasion give<lb/>
me to demonstrate. Well, then, I hear thus endeavourd to demon-<lb/>
strate it more a priori, than a posteriori, in so far as no such a<lb/>
every such a theorem is in its nature capable of being demonstrated:<lb/>
demonstrated by sample for the same reason that case is sold<lb/>
by sample: treasure a sample may with more cunvercum than<lb/>
which consists of a whole the Gramary, be bought in a man's pocket</p>





Revision as of 18:44, 26 July 2018

Click Here To Edit

1820 Sept 20

An Answer to Mason

Many Most of the other articles that you will find in that vast mass
that your shelves are about to be loaded with have the same tenden-
cy: — the fragment on evidence, "I catch Reform" on the subject of
Judicial Establishment and Procedure, "Swear not at all", on the
subject of evidence and a variety of other subjects, "Parlamentary
Reform Catechism" and "Bentham's Radical Reform Bill" on the
subject of National Representation &c &c "Church of Englandism
examined" on the subject of Ecclesiastical Establishment &c &c. Of all
these the work on Judicial Establishment, is that, which I should
expect to find would afford you most satisfaction. It has now
variety in it: it abounds more on matters of fact and arguments in
detail. It has more spirit than any other of my works: it was
written in the age of vejucer of age and under the excitement produced by
hope. But why need I refer you to all or any of these works
which are all new to you, throughout that work by Dumont which
introduced you to my acquaintance, do you not see the dissi-
militude of my notions on Law to the great mass of former no-
tions and at the same time the badness of that same great
mass of badness in a Body of Laws consists in its unconden-
civeness to the greatest happiness of the greatest number of
those who are governed by these: that all comprehensive end
and to the four subordinate ends comprehended in it voj
subsistence, abundance, security, and equality, as far as compati- con
ble existent. with reality.

"Avard nul egard. Dans un code code de lois par l'Espagne dans
son etat actuel il ne faut" avoir nul egard a la legislation des
"peuples anciens, ni aux codes adoptés chez les principales nati-
"-ons de l'Europe". Such is the theorem you in ths occasion give
me to demonstrate. Well, then, I hear thus endeavourd to demon-
strate it more a priori, than a posteriori, in so far as no such a
every such a theorem is in its nature capable of being demonstrated:
demonstrated by sample for the same reason that case is sold
by sample: treasure a sample may with more cunvercum than
which consists of a whole the Gramary, be bought in a man's pocket




Identifier: | JB/013/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

1820-09-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

in answer to mora

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

richard doane

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur de lys] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

4468

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in