JB/050/048/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/048/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Batch upload Box 50 - first attempt - fingers crossed
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/048/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/048/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<head>CERTAINTY. ACTION PENAL</head> <p>  <gap/> <!-- written below the line -->Protection Privilege <gap/></p> <p><note>The City of London censured<lb/> for <gap/> the formulary<lb/> in their Acts. v. <foreign> Prolium<lb/> Priviligas Londire</foreign> p.194, 197</note></p> <p>Privilege of being tried in a certain Court rather than <add>in</add> another was beneficial on <add>two</add><lb/> accounts; both depending on circumstances which are now no more</p> <p>The one, was, the saving of the inconvenience <add> when the Great Courts all except the Common Pleas fixed by <gap/><lb/> were ambulatory &amp;</add> personal attendance, where established, which now render the Law so intricate a <gap/><lb/> <Add>directly</add> managed their own causes <del>of</del> themselves <add>in person</add> without the intervention of Ar#ttornies:<lb/> the having the vhpoice of a Court whose partiality if any is their <gap/>, should eb in their <sic>favour</sic><lb/.>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 14:54, 29 July 2018

Click Here To Edit

CERTAINTY. ACTION PENAL

Protection Privilege

The City of London censured
for the formulary
in their Acts. v. Prolium
Priviligas Londire
p.194, 197

Privilege of being tried in a certain Court rather than in another was beneficial on two
accounts; both depending on circumstances which are now no more

The one, was, the saving of the inconvenience when the Great Courts all except the Common Pleas fixed by
were ambulatory &
personal attendance, where established, which now render the Law so intricate a
directly managed their own causes of themselves in person without the intervention of Ar#ttornies:
the having the vhpoice of a Court whose partiality if any is their , should eb in their favour<lb/.>




Identifier: | JB/050/048/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

048

Info in main headings field

certainty action penal

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16039

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in