JB/070/244/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/244/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<head> LARCENY. &#x2014; [Place] Quality [Manner] DEER.</head> <p> 1<lb/>9. H.3.c.10 <foreign>Charta de Foresta</foreign> &#x2014; The Punishments <add> for taking of <foreign><hi rend="underline"><unclear>Venatos</unclear> </hi></foreign> translated in one place Deer<lb/> &amp; in another Venison.</add> of Death and Mutilation are taken away<lb/> and in the room are substituted 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> Fine 2d<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi> In default of suffering, Imprisonment<lb/> for a year and a day, with Sureties at the expiration: &amp; in default of sureties<lb/> Abjuration.</p> <p><note> // The meaning of the word Venato<lb/> must be settled <del>on</del> <add> in event of</add> a Prosecution<lb/> on this Statute which is still<lb/> in force; as also, whether if it<lb/> be more extensive than the word<lb/> Deer in the Translation, that<lb/> word once used out of twice<lb/> would be <sic>holden</sic> to confine it.</note></p> <!-- pencil line across the margin --> <p>2<lb/> By 3.Ed.1.c.20 The Punishment for Trespass in Parks <add> without any further specification, <sic>agreably</sic> to the inaccurate general <gap/></add> [&amp; Ponds] is <del>made</del> <add>augmented to</add> 3 years<lb/>Imprisonment, <add>together with</add> Fine at the expiration if he hath wherewithal, &amp; in either case Land<lb/> or in default, Abjuration: <del>in case of Flight; and want of</del> <add> If the Offender flies and has not sufficient Land</add> sufficient Land "whereby<lb/> he may be justified", Outlawry, after Proclamation <add> being made</add> from County to County<lb/> For "taking <hi rend="underline">Farm
<head> LARCENY. &#x2014; [Place] Quality [Manner] DEER.</head> <p> 1<lb/>9. H.3.c.10 <foreign>Charta de Foresta</foreign> &#x2014; The Punishments <add> for taking of <foreign><hi rend="underline"><unclear>Venatos</unclear> </hi></foreign> translated in one place Deer<lb/> &amp; in another Venison.</add> of Death and Mutilation are taken away<lb/> and in the room are substituted 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> Fine 2d<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi> In default of suffering, Imprisonment<lb/> for a year and a day, with Sureties at the expiration: &amp; in default of sureties<lb/> Abjuration.</p> <p><note> // The meaning of the word Venato<lb/> must be settled <del>on</del> <add> in event of</add> a Prosecution<lb/> on this Statute which is still<lb/> in force; as also, whether if it<lb/> be more extensive than the word<lb/> Deer in the Translation, that<lb/> word once used out of twice<lb/> would be <sic>holden</sic> to confine it.</note></p> <!-- pencil line across the margin --> <p>2<lb/> By 3.Ed.1.c.20 The Punishment for Trespass in Parks <add> without any further specification, <sic>agreably</sic> to the inaccurate general <gap/></add> [&amp; Ponds] is <del>made</del> <add>augmented to</add> 3 years<lb/>Imprisonment, <add>together with</add> Fine at the expiration if he hath wherewithal, &amp; in either case Land<lb/> or in default, Abjuration: <del>in case of Flight; and want of</del> <add> If the Offender flies and has not sufficient Land</add> sufficient Land "whereby<lb/> he may be justified", Outlawry, after Proclamation <add> being made</add> from County to County<lb/> For "taking <hi rend="underline">Farm
</hi> Beasts or other thing in manner of Robbery" the same as by<lb/> Common Law for "open Theft &amp; Robbery." <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <lb/> <note> + And the circumstance of value is ever &amp; ever<lb/> combined with both.</note></p> <p><note>The circumstances from which occasion<lb/> has been taken to make variation<lb/> in the Punishment are reducible<lb/> to <gap/> 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> <gap/> Nature of the Goods.<lb/> under which head that [place comes incidentally under<lb/> consideration.<lb/>2 The Place from whence they are taken<lb/> These are the grand &amp; principal<lb/> But others incidentally</note></p> <p><note> Provisions <gap/> concerning Prosecution.</note></p> <p><note> By 1.Ed.3. Stat. 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>c.8. Other<lb/> Provisions concerning Prosecution</note></p> <p> By 1.H.7.7. <del>on Information of</del> The Punishment for "<del> the <gap/></del> Hunting with <gap/><lb/><add><unclear>as</unclear></add> <gap/><lb/> <unclear>Faces</unclear>, Visors, or otherwise disguised to the intent they should not be known, <hi rend="underline">or</hi> of unlawful<lb/> Hunting in time of Night," is <add> [hereafter]</add> the same as for Felony.</p> <p> There is a singular clause preceding this, whereby a person so hunting being apprehended<lb/> in consequence of an Information before any of the King's Counsel or a Justice<lb/> of Peace, is to suffer as for Felony "if he <sic>willfully</sic> conceal the said <sic>Huntings</sic> or any<lb/> person with him defective therein", <del>but is</del> <add> being <del>a</del></add> only to <add>be</add> <gap/>" as for "Trespass" "if he <gap/><lb/> "the Truth &amp; all that he shall be examined of &amp; <sic>knoweth</sic> on that behalf." &#x2014; This<lb/> seems to be temporary <add> &#x2014;</add> &amp; retrospective, for else <add> now otherwise</add> it would be contradicted by the clause<lb/> post mentioned &#x2014; The whole Statute is so confused &amp; contradictory, that honourable<lb/> doubts might be started concerning it.</p> <p><note> <add><del>Statutes</del></add> Offences Introductory &#x2014; by <sic>Statt.</sic> <lb/> 13.Ric.2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.13 <del><gap/></del> to destroy deer &amp;<lb/> 19.H 7 c.11. Backstalls &amp; Stalking.<lb/> 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.J.1.13.§§5. Backstalls &amp;c</note></p> <p><note> It is a <del>reflection</del> <add>question</add> that occurs obviously<lb/> enough from the comparison of this<lb/> with the <gap/> of Ed. 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> &#x2014; If the <gap/><lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add>denounced</add> by the Culture were thought to serve<lb/> <add> to be carried into execution</add> why was it not repeated?  if not severe<lb/> enough; to what purpose <unclear>fell</unclear> off to these<lb/> weaker ones?  This Anticlimax is<lb/> very frequent among <del>as</del> Statutes.</note></p> <p>4. Place<lb/> <del>By 19.H.7 c.41</del> By 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Ch.c.21 &#x2014; <del>For</del> If any person, "in manner <add>therein</add> aforesaid [in the P<gap/><lb/> shall <del>wrongfully</del> unlawfully <del><gap/></del> enter into any park <gap/>, or any other several <gap/><lb/> closed with Wall, Path or Hedge, and used for the keeping &amp; cherishing of Deer, &amp; <hi rend="underline">so</hi> wrong<lb/> hunt or drive or chase out or take kill or slay any deer within" the same &#x2014; the <unclear>Penalty</unclear><lb/> is &#x2014; <add> 5th damages, <del>as by</del> together with costs by 7.J.1.c.13. or else by Pounds at the election of the party grieved is </add> three months Imprisonment.  Sureties for 7 years releasable by the <lb/> Party grieved or to be discharged by the Court, satisfaction having been made to the party,<lb/> on declaration of repentance.</p> <p> The 3<hi rend="superscript">rd</hi> .J.1.13 after <del>taking notice</del> <add> making an observation +</add> <note> + §§1</note> that the Act of <sic>Eliz.</sic> did not extend to Park<lb/> since enclosed, for which there seems <del><gap/></del> no foundation, proceeds to enact <hi rend="superscript">||</hi> <note>|| §§2.</note> in the very same <gap/><lb/> with the only differences of <add> leaving out the word <hi rend="underline">so</hi> </add> <del>inserting "Coins" after</del> "<del>deer</del>", &amp; <add> inserting costs</add>  &amp;"Costs" after "Damages" <del>together</del></p> <p> THEFT Deer [1][</p>  
</hi> Beasts or other thing in manner of Robbery" the same as by<lb/> Common Law for "open Theft &amp; Robbery." <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <lb/> <note> + And the circumstance of value is ever &amp; ever<lb/> combined with both.</note></p> <p><note>The circumstances from which occasion<lb/> has been taken to make variation<lb/> in the Punishment are reducible<lb/> to <gap/> 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> <gap/> Nature of the Goods.<lb/> under which head that [place comes incidentally under<lb/> consideration.<lb/>2 The Place from whence they are taken<lb/> These are the grand &amp; principal<lb/> But others incidentally</note></p> <p><note> Provisions also concerning Prosecution.</note></p> <p><note> By 1.Ed.3. Stat. 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>c.8. Other<lb/> Provisions concerning Prosecution</note></p> <p> 3<lb/>By 1.H.7.7. <del>on Information of</del> The Punishment for "<del> the <gap/></del> Hunting with <gap/><lb/><add><unclear>as</unclear></add> <gap/><lb/> <unclear>Faces</unclear>, Visors, or otherwise disguised to the intent they should not be known, <hi rend="underline">or</hi> of unlawful<lb/> Hunting in time of Night," is <add> [hereafter]</add> the same as for Felony.</p> <p> There is a singular clause preceding this, whereby a person so hunting being apprehended<lb/> in consequence of an Information before any of the King's Counsel or a Justice<lb/> of Peace, is to suffer as for Felony "if he <sic>willfully</sic> conceal the said <sic>Huntings</sic> or any<lb/> person with him defective therein", <del>but is</del> <add> being <del>a</del></add> only to <add>be</add> <gap/>" as for "Trespass" "if he <gap/><lb/> "the Truth &amp; all that he shall be examined of &amp; <sic>knoweth</sic> on that behalf." &#x2014; This<lb/> seems to be temporary <add> &#x2014;</add> &amp; retrospective, for else <add> now otherwise</add> it would be contradicted by the clause<lb/> post mentioned &#x2014; The whole Statute is so confused &amp; contradictory, that honourable<lb/> doubts might be started concerning it.</p> <p><note> <add><del>Statutes</del></add> Offences Introductory &#x2014; by <sic>Statt.</sic> <lb/> 13.Ric.2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.13 <del><gap/></del> to destroy deer &amp;<lb/> 19.H 7 c.11. Backstalls &amp; Stalking.<lb/> 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.J.1.13.§§5. Backstalls &amp;c</note></p> <p><note> It is a <del>reflection</del> <add>question</add> that occurs obviously<lb/> enough from the comparison of this<lb/> with the <gap/> of Ed. 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> &#x2014; If the <gap/><lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add>denounced</add> by the Culture were thought to serve<lb/> <add> to be carried into execution</add> why was it not repeated?  if not severe<lb/> enough; to what purpose <unclear>fell</unclear> off to these<lb/> weaker ones?  This Anticlimax is<lb/> very frequent among <del>as</del> Statutes.</note></p> <p>4. Place<lb/> <del>By 19.H.7 c.41</del> By 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Ch.c.21 &#x2014; <del>For</del> If any person, "in manner <add>therein</add> aforesaid [in the P<gap/><lb/> shall <del>wrongfully</del> unlawfully <del><gap/></del> enter into any park <gap/>, or any other several <gap/><lb/> closed with Wall, Path or Hedge, and used for the keeping &amp; cherishing of Deer, &amp; <hi rend="underline">so</hi> wrong<lb/> hunt or drive or chase out or take kill or slay any deer within" the same &#x2014; the <unclear>Penalty</unclear><lb/> is &#x2014; <add> 5th damages, <del>as by</del> together with costs by 7.J.1.c.13. or else by Pounds at the election of the party grieved is </add> three months Imprisonment.  Sureties for 7 years releasable by the <lb/> Party grieved or to be discharged by the Court, satisfaction having been made to the party,<lb/> on declaration of repentance.</p> <p> The 3<hi rend="superscript">rd</hi> .J.1.13 after <del>taking notice</del> <add> making an observation +</add> <note> + §§1</note> that the Act of <sic>Eliz.</sic> did not extend to Park<lb/> since enclosed, for which there seems <del><gap/></del> no foundation, proceeds to enact <hi rend="superscript">||</hi> <note>|| §§2.</note> in the very same <gap/><lb/> with the only differences of <add> leaving out the word <hi rend="underline">so</hi> </add> <del>inserting "Coins" after</del> "<del>deer</del>", &amp; <add> inserting costs</add>  &amp;"Costs" after "Damages" <del>together</del></p> <p> THEFT Deer [1][</p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:40, 8 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY. — [Place] Quality [Manner] DEER.

1
9. H.3.c.10 Charta de Foresta — The Punishments for taking of Venatos translated in one place Deer
& in another Venison.
of Death and Mutilation are taken away
and in the room are substituted 1st Fine 2dly In default of suffering, Imprisonment
for a year and a day, with Sureties at the expiration: & in default of sureties
Abjuration.

// The meaning of the word Venato
must be settled on in event of a Prosecution
on this Statute which is still
in force; as also, whether if it
be more extensive than the word
Deer in the Translation, that
word once used out of twice
would be holden to confine it.

2
By 3.Ed.1.c.20 The Punishment for Trespass in Parks without any further specification, agreably to the inaccurate general [& Ponds] is made augmented to 3 years
Imprisonment, together with Fine at the expiration if he hath wherewithal, & in either case Land
or in default, Abjuration: in case of Flight; and want of If the Offender flies and has not sufficient Land sufficient Land "whereby
he may be justified", Outlawry, after Proclamation being made from County to County
For "taking Farm Beasts or other thing in manner of Robbery" the same as by
Common Law for "open Theft & Robbery." +
+ And the circumstance of value is ever & ever
combined with both.

The circumstances from which occasion
has been taken to make variation
in the Punishment are reducible
to 1st Nature of the Goods.
under which head that [place comes incidentally under
consideration.
2 The Place from whence they are taken
These are the grand & principal
But others incidentally

Provisions also concerning Prosecution.

By 1.Ed.3. Stat. 2dc.8. Other
Provisions concerning Prosecution

3
By 1.H.7.7. on Information of The Punishment for " the Hunting with
as
Faces, Visors, or otherwise disguised to the intent they should not be known, or of unlawful
Hunting in time of Night," is [hereafter] the same as for Felony.

There is a singular clause preceding this, whereby a person so hunting being apprehended
in consequence of an Information before any of the King's Counsel or a Justice
of Peace, is to suffer as for Felony "if he willfully conceal the said Huntings or any
person with him defective therein", but is being a only to be " as for "Trespass" "if he
"the Truth & all that he shall be examined of & knoweth on that behalf." — This
seems to be temporary & retrospective, for else now otherwise it would be contradicted by the clause
post mentioned — The whole Statute is so confused & contradictory, that honourable
doubts might be started concerning it.

Statutes Offences Introductory — by Statt.
13.Ric.2d.13 to destroy deer &
19.H 7 c.11. Backstalls & Stalking.
3d.J.1.13.§§5. Backstalls &c

It is a reflection question that occurs obviously
enough from the comparison of this
with the of Ed. 1st — If the
denounced by the Culture were thought to serve
to be carried into execution why was it not repeated? if not severe
enough; to what purpose fell off to these
weaker ones? This Anticlimax is
very frequent among as Statutes.

4. Place
By 19.H.7 c.41 By 5th Ch.c.21 — For If any person, "in manner therein aforesaid [in the P
shall wrongfully unlawfully enter into any park , or any other several
closed with Wall, Path or Hedge, and used for the keeping & cherishing of Deer, & so wrong
hunt or drive or chase out or take kill or slay any deer within" the same — the Penalty
is — 5th damages, as by together with costs by 7.J.1.c.13. or else by Pounds at the election of the party grieved is three months Imprisonment. Sureties for 7 years releasable by the
Party grieved or to be discharged by the Court, satisfaction having been made to the party,
on declaration of repentance.

The 3rd .J.1.13 after taking notice making an observation + + §§1 that the Act of Eliz. did not extend to Park
since enclosed, for which there seems no foundation, proceeds to enact || || §§2. in the very same
with the only differences of leaving out the word so inserting "Coins" after "deer", & inserting costs &"Costs" after "Damages" together

THEFT Deer [1][



Identifier: | JB/070/244/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

244

Info in main headings field

larceny deer

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23359

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in