JB/070/235/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/070/235/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>LARCENY AESTINIATION</head> <p> That the <del>mischief</del> <add> general measure</add> rule for estimating the mischief of a Larceny may be the <unclear>amount</unclear> <lb/> of the Value of [the thing] <add>what is</add> stolen. <hi rend="superscript">+</hi></p> <!-- short line across the page --><p> <note>+ <lb/>1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> because the <gap/> will never be able to<lb/> reconcile themselves to the notion of one who<lb/> has stolen a shilling suffering as much<lb/> as one who has stolen £</note></p> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>. &#x2014; because in many cases a man wants<lb/> only a certain Sum &amp; would be stopped of that<lb/> Sum by a heavier penalty for taking more.</note></p> <p> &#x2014;&#x2014; And inversely, by every exceeding of punishment for a particular kind of Larceny<lb/> above that for the rest, you encourage Robberies, for Robbery, Burglaries, &amp; for<lb/> Burglary, Murders</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note> That the Clothiers <add>&amp;c</add> and Blackers]<lb/> should be willing to obtain what<lb/> they thought a further security<lb/> for their property; is natural:<lb/> as it is, <add>nor is it otherwise</add> that the Legislature<lb/> in the hurry of a Sessions should<lb/> be <del>p</del> not long to gratify them in it,<lb/> <add> at the <sic>expence</sic></add> as it seemed to tehm, only of a <lb/> set of <gap/> but in a well <add>an uniform</add><lb/> considered <add> &amp; well apportioned</add>code </p> <!-- text to the right on page but encircled to separate it --><p> <add> or</add> Causing their proportions being observed, <add> is not that absolute necessity</add> because<lb/> the bulk of Lawyers have not <gap/> <add> to make an <unclear>issue</unclear></add> <lb/> <del>to put</del> <add>between</add> which &amp; Larceny to make their<lb/> option.</p> <p> It is advantageous to make the <foreign>quantium</foreign> of the <gap/><lb/> stolen the <del>standard</del> <add>measure</add> of the Punishment on two or account<lb/> 1st That there may in all cases be a motive &amp; consequently<lb/> a chance for the malefactor's stopping his<lb/> depredation at the point to which reaches his spec<gap/><lb/> necessity <add>exigencies &amp; this is the only system whereon that chance can be had</add> </add>: &#x2014;2 Because it conforms to popular opinion; <hi rend="superscript">#</hi>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:15, 10 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY AESTINIATION

That the mischief general measure rule for estimating the mischief of a Larceny may be the amount
of the Value of [the thing] what is stolen. +

+
1st because the will never be able to
reconcile themselves to the notion of one who
has stolen a shilling suffering as much
as one who has stolen £

2d. — because in many cases a man wants
only a certain Sum & would be stopped of that
Sum by a heavier penalty for taking more.

—— And inversely, by every exceeding of punishment for a particular kind of Larceny
above that for the rest, you encourage Robberies, for Robbery, Burglaries, & for
Burglary, Murders

<note> That the Clothiers &c and Blackers]
should be willing to obtain what
they thought a further security
for their property; is natural:
as it is, nor is it otherwise that the Legislature
in the hurry of a Sessions should
be p not long to gratify them in it,
at the expence as it seemed to tehm, only of a
set of but in a well an uniform
considered & well apportionedcode

or Causing their proportions being observed, is not that absolute necessity because
the bulk of Lawyers have not to make an issue
to put between which & Larceny to make their
option.

It is advantageous to make the quantium of the
stolen the standard measure of the Punishment on two or account
1st That there may in all cases be a motive & consequently
a chance for the malefactor's stopping his
depredation at the point to which reaches his spec
necessity exigencies & this is the only system whereon that chance can be had </add>: —2 Because it conforms to popular opinion; #



Identifier: | JB/070/235/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

235

Info in main headings field

larceny aestimation

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23350

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in