JB/070/228/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/070/228/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
taking <add>of the whole</add> which was no trespass, but the partial taking [which <add>according</add> in the idea here <add>attributed </add> <gap/><lb/>
taking <add>of the whole</add> which was no trespass, but the partial taking [which <add>according</add> in the idea here <add>attributed </add> <gap/><lb/>
<add>to him</add> ], besides that the Idea of <add>++</add> two takings one within another is not very satisfactory <add>I</add><lb/>
<add>to him</add> ], besides that the Idea of <add>++</add> two takings one within another is not very satisfactory <add>I</add><lb/>
see not here this second taking can be kept <add>contra-distinct</add> clear from the "carrying away", <add>to</add> who<lb/>
<note>++ of taking the same thing over <del><gap/></del> again<lb/>
after he had got it</note> see not here this second taking can be kept <add>contra-distinct</add> clear from the "carrying away", <add>to</add> who<lb/>
my apprehension necessarily includes it.</p>
my apprehension necessarily includes it.</p>
<p>At least if, the most of possessions [acquired by] <add>the</add> taking within <add>after upon</add> in taking<lb/>
<del>first</del> <add>second</add> of which was <del>no</del> <unclear>purpose</unclear> and <del>an</del><add>the</add>other not, was what he conceived; he should have <add>g<add>iven</add></add><lb/>
some notice of his meaning</p>
<note><add>#</add> It is a vulgar <gap/> that <del><gap/></del><add>a man</add> <gap/><lb/>
no good <del>to be</del> hanged for a Sheep as<lb/>
a Lamb &#x2014; but <del>according to the</del><add>have the advice of</add><lb/>
<add>the Law is <del>do</del></add> <del><gap/></del> [<del><gap/> should a</del>ct] <gap/> <add>not</add> with<lb/>
the Lamb, but by all means take<lb/>
the Sheep &amp; he<add>you</add> would not be hanged<lb/>
at all.</note><lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:47, 11 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY EMBEZZLEMENT

After having thus endeavour'd to establish a comprehensiblean intelligible distinction between these tw crimes
it will be edifying to observe how they have been confounded —

If we believe Serj.t Hawkins speaking from his Judgement + — " If a pad
be guilty or no Trespass in taking the Goods, he cannot be guilty of Felony" in carrying them away"<add>[+]</add>

+ 1. Hawk, 89-SS2.
[+] and agreeable to this he observes SS3 (speaks)
f and for this he cites a decision an authority) that "a
"Carrier who receives Goods in order"
"to carry them to a certain place, "
"cannot be said to steal them,"
by imbezzeling of them afterwards."
now by stbr being said to steal them
it appears by the same fiction, he
means, being felonouslyguilty. [of Felony,
that is of Larceny.]

If we believe the same Sergt. Hawkins speaking in the next page from his
Authorities, it Ca opening a Bank and taking out a part with intent to steal things
may . ing possession here to possession are within another
Nowin both these cases, by the supposition was is the original taking the same, and means
of them a trespass.

If it be said on his behalf, that in the case last part he means not the origin
taking of the whole which was no trespass, but the partial taking [which according in the idea here attributed
to him ], besides that the Idea of ++ two takings one within another is not very satisfactory I
++ of taking the same thing over again
after he had got it
see not here this second taking can be kept contra-distinct clear from the "carrying away", to who
my apprehension necessarily includes it.

At least if, the most of possessions [acquired by] the taking within after upon in taking
first second of which was no purpose and antheother not, was what he conceived; he should have g<add>iven</add>
some notice of his meaning

# It is a vulgar that a man
no good to be hanged for a Sheep as
a Lamb — but according to thehave the advice of
the Law is do [ should act] not with
the Lamb, but by all means take
the Sheep & heyou would not be hanged
at all.



Identifier: | JB/070/228/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

228

Info in main headings field

larceny embezzlement

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23343

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in