JB/070/249/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/249/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>LARCENY &#x2014; Deer <hi rend="superscript">6.</hi></head> <p> The String of Statutes is not yet at an end.  The last of which an account has been<lb/> given, <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note> + 10.G.2.32 §§.7. And the 9<lb/> §§ continued by 17.G.2.c. .§§. .  &amp; 24<lb/> G.2.c. . .§§. . &amp; perpetuated by 31.G.2.<lb/> c.42. §§25 &amp; <lb/>(<gap/> retard <gap/><lb/> the former.</note>, relates, as we have seen <add>observed</add> the Statute next before it does <add> to do</add> only to Deer kept under<lb/> <sic>inclosures:</sic> those in open Forests &amp; chases being still entrusted to the ineffectual guard<lb/> of pecuniary penalties: to supply this defect, it inflicts the <del>penalty</del> <add> punishment</add> of a 7 year<lb/> transportation, but not <sic>till</sic> after a second Offence: a striking disparity, which if not <add> it has</add> <lb/> its' <add><del>like</del> any assignable</add> reasons, has its' <add> at least its assignable</add> causes; the explanation of which induces <add> will give occasion to</add> the necessity of a few<lb/> observations, <add> with</add> which <del>will</del> <sic>compleat</sic> <add><del>close</del></add> the Theory of the subject may be concluded.</p> <p><note> By 8.9. Persons arrived (as therein<lb/> aforesaid &#x2014; viz: with fire arms hand-staves<lb/> flails &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">and</hi> other offensive weapons) coming<lb/> into a place <del><gap/></del> <sic>inclosed</sic> or not <sic>inclosed</sic> <lb/> where Deer are kept <del>&amp; liberty</del> <add> with an intent</add><lb/> to hunt, <add> <gap/></add> <del> <gap/> in <gap/></del> kill, wound or take<lb/> away, and unlawfully beating or wounding <lb/> any keeper<lb/> or page<lb/> in the<lb/> execution<lb/> of his office<lb/> shall<lb/> be transported<lb/> for 7 years<lb/> &amp; returning<lb/> suffer death</note></p> <p> We have already seen how it is, that with regard to <del>such</del> <add> that</add> class of animals among<lb/> which <del>the Deer</del> <add> that in question</add> has been ranked, no mark of appropriation could <del>of <gap/></del> <add> be taken</add> if one may so<lb/> say from the person of the animal: there remained therefore from whence only it<lb/> could be taken, <add>deduced</add> the circumstance of place.<add> of its' abode</add></p> <p><note> so, in <hi rend="underline">proximity</hi><lb/> not <hi rend="underline">intention</hi>.</note></p> <p><note> Appropriated from locality</note></p> <p><note> <del>Principal Offences ) Injuring<lb/> ) Destroying<lb/> )Stealing</del></note></p> <p> <sic>Tis</sic> accordingly that circumstances, by the mediation of which<lb/> we <add>alone</add> shall find upon looking back in <del>the <gap/> of </del> <add> the early <gap/> of our</add> Jurisprudence<lb/> the proprietor &amp; the subject of the property to be connected.  The<lb/> taking or as we should now term it, the stealing of Deer, is there considered not as a <lb/> taking of a <hi rend="underline">thing</hi> that belonged to the proprietor but the transferring upon <hi rend="underline">Land</hi> that belonged to<lb/>him &#x2014; A Statute made against offenders in their behalf is said to be made against <add>concerning</add> <gap/><lb/> in Parks; whereas<del> <gap/> and sheep are never</del> <add> differably as any one may now from them against statutes of <del>Sheep</del> Poultry &amp; Horses</add> who are not designed by any such<lb/>circumlocutory description <del>of</del> <add> as</add> those <add><del><gap/></del></add> of Malefactors in Poultry yards or Stables.</p> <p>Now we have <del>here</del> <add> before <add> on a former occasion</add> observed, Law <unclear>unvarious</unclear> of real <add>immovable</add> property have <add> always</add> been widely distinguished <lb/> from those of personal by the <add>comparative</add> mildness of their punishments: we have there likewise observed<lb/> that that distinction written silently <add>complicitly</add> than roundly was founded on, as it is at this time to be<lb/> punished by, the permanency if the subject matter.   but as <del>mere</del> <add>when</add> a provision <add> practice</add> is thoroughly<lb/> <del>to <gap/></del> <add> unpublished</add> and undisputed <add> <gap/></add> men are not apt to turn their eyes backward to its foundation<lb/> especially in a barbarous &amp; <sic>unsentimentizedy</sci> age; <add> and as the kind of instinct which secretly/silently guided them to that provision, having performed its' office vanished altogether</add> as books regarded <add> <gap/></add> <del>on that <gap/></del> <add> by the many</add> to be regarded<lb/> in the light of a more positive institution, it was easily extended <add> as will appear in <del>those</del> all such cases</add> to a subject to which<lb/> the considerations which secretly guided it to establishment, were not <add>are no longer</add> applicable</p> <p> Hence it is that the punishment of Death which <del><gap/></del> for some time was law for<lb/> these offences when <add>while</add> there was no other Law than the practise of the King's ministers and<lb/> Judges wa thought grievous and the abrogating <add>of</add> it made a point of in that Charter of<lb/> concessions which was an accompaniment equally valuable <add>worthy</add> as <del>it's</del> <add> valued at that time</add> principal to <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></p> <!-- ink line across the page leading to bracketed text in the margin --> <p><note>v Off Prices &amp; <sic>Access<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. </sic> 1<lb/> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> 22</del><lb/> Necessary Categorically, when <add> the</add> there be <add><sic>Accessry</sic></add> <lb/> <add>in the nature of things</add> but one road from the <add>lands</add> to the principal<lb/> <add><gap/> is to Guilt</add> &amp; no where else; Hypothetically, when it<lb/> has two <del>p</del> or more Roads; <del>Co</del> one <del>more<d/el> leading<lb/> to Guilt, &amp; one or more leading to Innocence<lb/> but which the Law has been careful to <gap/><lb/> <unclear>Reference</unclear> by description</note></p> <p> Another difference between Game &amp; other animals is, that about the latter there is the appearance of <sic>labor</sic><lb/> bestowed; which is much circumstance in giving title according to the general actions of marked &amp; in connection<lb/> <add>in the imagination</add> the <gap/> of the proprietor with the subject of the property.  Where <del>there</del> this <del>the</del> takes place, it is <unclear>expected</unclear><lb/> that that thing belong to that person, <add> &amp; men are disposed to acquiesce in its' doing so</add> for a reason which is in some confused not perceived by every one the<lb/> were this not the case no <sic>labor</sic> at all would be bestowed on any subject at all, &amp; so every man would be <gap/> <add>under<a/dd> a<lb/> <gap/> having <add> possessing</add> not only what his own <sic>labor</sic> might produce but from the <add><gap/></add> chance of possessing the <del><gap/></del> <add>several</add> <unclear>privileges</unclear></p> <p><note><del> <gap/> <gap/> &amp; after all in a <gap/><lb/> any body would think <gap/> <gap/> different<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> was directly <gap/><lb/> but</del></note></p> <p><note> Noting their infirmity &amp; known<lb/> and what the <gap/> of an idle <gap/><lb/> <add>loss</add> would be perpetually driving them into <lb/> transgression.</note></p> <p><note>THEFT Deer,</note>  [6][ </p>
<head>LARCENY &#x2014; Deer <hi rend="superscript">6.</hi></head> <p> The String of Statutes is not yet at an end.  The last of which an account has been<lb/> given, <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note> + 10.G.2.32 §§.7. And the 9<lb/> §§ continued by 17.G.2.c. .§§. .  &amp; 24<lb/> G.2.c. . .§§. . &amp; perpetuated by 31.G.2.<lb/> c.42. §§25 &amp; 6<lb/>(Transportation retard <gap/><lb/> the former.</note>, relates, as we have seen <add>observed</add> the Statute next before it does <add> to do</add> only to Deer kept under<lb/> <sic>inclosures:</sic> those in open Forests &amp; chases being still entrusted to the ineffectual guard<lb/> of pecuniary penalties: to supply this defect, it inflicts the <del>penalty</del> <add> punishment</add> of a 7 year<lb/> transportation, but not <sic>till</sic> after a second Offence: a striking disparity, which if not <add> it has</add> <lb/> its' <add><del>like</del> any assignable</add> reasons, has its' <add> at least its assignable</add> causes; the explanation of which induces <add> will give occasion to</add> the necessity of a few<lb/> observations, <add> with</add> which <del>will</del> <sic>compleat</sic> <add><del>close</del></add> the Theory of the subject may be concluded.</p> <p><note> By 8.9. Persons arrived (as therein<lb/> aforesaid &#x2014; viz: with fire arms hand-staves<lb/> flails &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">and</hi> other offensive weapons) coming<lb/> into a place <del><gap/></del> <sic>inclosed</sic> or not <sic>inclosed</sic> <lb/> where Deer are kept <del>&amp; liberty</del> <add> with an intent</add><lb/> to hunt, <add> <gap/></add> <del> <gap/> in <gap/></del> kill, wound or take<lb/> away, and unlawfully beating or wounding <lb/> any keeper<lb/> or page<lb/> in the<lb/> execution<lb/> of his office<lb/> shall<lb/> be transported<lb/> for 7 years<lb/> &amp; returning<lb/> suffer death</note></p> <p> We have already seen how it is, that with regard to <del>such</del> <add> that</add> class of animals among<lb/> which <del>the Deer</del> <add> that in question</add> has been ranked, no mark of appropriation could <del>of <gap/></del> <add> be taken</add> if one may so<lb/> say from the person of the animal: there remained therefore from whence only it<lb/> could be taken, <add>deduced</add> the circumstance of place.<add> of its' abode</add></p> <p><note> so, in <hi rend="underline">proximity</hi><lb/> not <hi rend="underline">intention</hi>.</note></p> <p><note> Appropriated from locality</note></p> <!-- all following paragraphs are crossed through --><p><note>Principal Offences ) Injuring<lb/> ) Destroying<lb/> )Stealing</note></p> <p><note>Accessory offences ( Of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> order<lb/> <hi rend="underline">precedent</hi> )Hunting <lb/> (only <hi rend="underline"><unclear>shooting</unclear></hi></note></p> <p> <note> <gap/> connected (Of the 2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> order<lb/>simply and (Entering <add>armed</add> with<lb/>categorically (intent to hurt <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <lb/> (inadequately</note></p> <p><note> # and likewise beating<lb/> the keepers] (<gap/>). ( Of the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> order ‡ <lb/> so G.2.32.8 ) Keeping Deer-<gap/><lb/> ( or Back stall</note></p> <p><note> <p><note>Accessory Offences<lb/> subsequent</note></p> <p> <note>#<lb/> <gap/> connected<lb/> Hypothetically <lb/>&amp; only in order<lb/> inadequately <lb/> as <gap/> not<lb/> &#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;<lb/> adequately<lb/> descending</note></p>   <p><!-- in a box to the left of the next paragraph -->The History of <unclear>Jurors</unclear> is their refutation<lb/> <note>+</note><foreign><hi rend="underline">Errores ad sum principete refute est<lb/> refellere.</hi></foreign></p><p> <sic>Tis</sic> accordingly that circumstances, by the mediation of which<lb/> <add>alone</add> we <add>alone</add> shall find upon looking back in <del>the <gap/> of </del> <add> the early periods of our</add> Jurisprudence<lb/> the proprietor &amp; the subject of the property to be connected.  The<lb/> taking or as we should now term it, the stealing of Deer, is there considered not as a <lb/> taking of a <hi rend="underline">thing</hi> that belonged to the proprietor but the transferring upon <hi rend="underline">Land</hi> that belonged to<lb/>him &#x2014; A Statute made against offenders in their behalf is said to be made against <add>concerning</add> <gap/><lb/> in Parks; whereas<del> <gap/> and sheep are never</del> <add> <sic>differably</sic> as any one may now from those against <unclear>Hunters</unclear> of <del>Sheep</del> Poultry &amp; Horses</add> who are not designed by any such<lb/>circumlocutory description <del>of</del> <add> as</add> those <add><del><gap/></del></add> of Malefactors in Poultry yards or Stables.</p> <p>Now we have <del>here</del> <add> before <add> on a former occasion</add> observed, Law <unclear>unvarious</unclear> of real <add>immovable</add> property have <add> always</add> been widely distinguished <lb/> from those of personal by the <add>comparative</add> mildness of their punishments: we have there likewise observed<lb/> that that distinction written silently <add>implicitly</add> than roundly was founded on, as it is at this time to be<lb/> <gap/> by, the permanency of the subject matter.  But as <del>mere</del> <add>when</add> a provision <add> practice</add> is thoroughly<lb/> <del>to <gap/></del> <add> unpublished</add> and undisputed <add>unquestioned</add> men are not apt to turn their eyes backward to its foundation<lb/> especially in a barbarous &amp; <sic>unsentimentizedy</sic> age; <add> and as the kind of instinct which secretly/silently guided them to that provision, having performed its' office vanished altogether</add> as books regarded <add>by those many</add> <del>on that <gap/></del> to be regarded<lb/> in the light of a more positive institution, it was easily extended <add> as will appear in <del>those</del> all such cases</add> to a subject to which<lb/> the considerations which secretly guided it to establishment, were not <add>are no longer</add> applicable</p> <p><note>For <sic>tho'</sic> every man<lb/> <del>with that limitation</del> <add> who keeps Buck Stalls</add> must be<lb/> a Man who would <del><gap/></del> <add>take</add> Deer<lb/> yet every man who takes Deer<lb/>is not a man who keeps Backstalls</note></p> <p><note> The assemblage of Principal &amp; Accessory <add>ies</add><lb/> offences <gap/> as well with the<lb/> subject matter <add><gap/></add> as with the definition <add> of the <gap/></add> <lb/>taken from the <add>general</add> manner of perpetuation<lb/><add>of the <gap/></add> <del> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <lb/>&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014; <lb/> <del> being <gap/> to repeal</del> </note></p> <p> Hence it is that the punishment of Death which <del><gap/></del> for some time was law for<lb/> these offences when <add>while</add> there was no other Law than the practise of the King's ministers and<lb/> Judges was thought grievous and the abrogating <add>of</add> it made a point of in that Charter of<lb/> Concessions which was an accompaniment equally valuable <add>worthy</add> as <del>it's</del> <add> valued at that time</add> principal to <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></p> <!-- ink line across the page leading to bracketed text in the margin --> <p><note>v Off Prices &amp; <sic>Access<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. </sic> 1<lb/> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> 2</del><lb/> Necessary Categorically, when <add> the</add> there be <add><sic>Accessry</sic></add> <lb/> <add>in the nature of things</add> but one road from the <add>lands</add> to the Principal<lb/> <add><gap/> is to Guilt</add> &amp; no where else; Hypothetically, when it<lb/> has two <del>p</del> or more Roads; <del>Co</del> one <del>more</del> leading<lb/> to Guilt, &amp; one or more leading to Innocence<lb/> but which the Law has been careful to stopage<lb/> <unclear>Reference</unclear> by description</note></p>  <p> Another difference between Game &amp; other animals is, that about the latter there is the appearance of <sic>labor</sic><lb/> bestowed; which is much circumstance in giving title according to the general <unclear>notions</unclear> of marked &amp; in connection<lb/> <add>in the imagination</add> the <gap/> of the proprietor with the subject of the property.  Where <del>there</del> this <del>the</del> takes place, it is <unclear>expected</unclear><lb/> that that thing belong to that person, <add> &amp; men are disposed to acquiesce in its' doing so</add> for a reason which is in some confused not perceived by every one that<lb/> were this not the case no <sic>Labor</sic> at all would be bestowed on any subject at all, &amp; so every man be depended <add>under</add> a<lb/> <del><gap/></del> having <add> possessing</add> not only what his own <sic>labor</sic> might produce but from the <add>various</add> chance of possessing the <del><gap/></del> <add>several</add> <unclear>privileges</unclear></p> <p><note><del> <gap/> <gap/> &amp; after all in a <gap/><lb/> any body would think <gap/> <gap/> different<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> was directly <gap/><lb/> but</del></note></p> <p><note> Noting their infirmity &amp; known<lb/> and what the <gap/> of an idle &amp; <gap/><lb/> <add>loss</add> would be perpetually driving them into <lb/> transgression.</note></p> <p><note>THEFT Deer,</note>  [6][ </p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:10, 1 September 2018

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY — Deer 6.

The String of Statutes is not yet at an end. The last of which an account has been
given, + + 10.G.2.32 §§.7. And the 9
§§ continued by 17.G.2.c. .§§. . & 24
G.2.c. . .§§. . & perpetuated by 31.G.2.
c.42. §§25 & 6
(Transportation retard
the former.
, relates, as we have seen observed the Statute next before it does to do only to Deer kept under
inclosures: those in open Forests & chases being still entrusted to the ineffectual guard
of pecuniary penalties: to supply this defect, it inflicts the penalty punishment of a 7 year
transportation, but not till after a second Offence: a striking disparity, which if not it has
its' like any assignable reasons, has its' at least its assignable causes; the explanation of which induces will give occasion to the necessity of a few
observations, with which will compleat close the Theory of the subject may be concluded.

By 8.9. Persons arrived (as therein
aforesaid — viz: with fire arms hand-staves
flails — and other offensive weapons) coming
into a place inclosed or not inclosed
where Deer are kept & liberty with an intent
to hunt, in kill, wound or take
away, and unlawfully beating or wounding
any keeper
or page
in the
execution
of his office
shall
be transported
for 7 years
& returning
suffer death

We have already seen how it is, that with regard to such that class of animals among
which the Deer that in question has been ranked, no mark of appropriation could of be taken if one may so
say from the person of the animal: there remained therefore from whence only it
could be taken, deduced the circumstance of place. of its' abode

so, in proximity
not intention.

Appropriated from locality

Principal Offences ) Injuring
) Destroying
)Stealing

Accessory offences ( Of the 1st order
precedent )Hunting
(only shooting

connected (Of the 2nd order
simply and (Entering armed with
categorically (intent to hurt +
(inadequately

# and likewise beating
the keepers] (). ( Of the 3d order ‡
so G.2.32.8 ) Keeping Deer-
( or Back stall

<note>Accessory Offences
subsequent

#
connected
Hypothetically
& only in order
inadequately
as not
———
adequately
descending

The History of Jurors is their refutation
+Errores ad sum principete refute est
refellere.

Tis accordingly that circumstances, by the mediation of which
alone we alone shall find upon looking back in the of the early periods of our Jurisprudence
the proprietor & the subject of the property to be connected. The
taking or as we should now term it, the stealing of Deer, is there considered not as a
taking of a thing that belonged to the proprietor but the transferring upon Land that belonged to
him — A Statute made against offenders in their behalf is said to be made against concerning
in Parks; whereas and sheep are never differably as any one may now from those against Hunters of Sheep Poultry & Horses who are not designed by any such
circumlocutory description of as those of Malefactors in Poultry yards or Stables.

Now we have here before <add> on a former occasion observed, Law unvarious of real immovable property have always been widely distinguished
from those of personal by the comparative mildness of their punishments: we have there likewise observed
that that distinction written silently implicitly than roundly was founded on, as it is at this time to be
by, the permanency of the subject matter. But as mere when a provision practice is thoroughly
to unpublished and undisputed unquestioned men are not apt to turn their eyes backward to its foundation
especially in a barbarous & unsentimentizedy age; and as the kind of instinct which secretly/silently guided them to that provision, having performed its' office vanished altogether as books regarded by those many on that to be regarded
in the light of a more positive institution, it was easily extended as will appear in those all such cases to a subject to which
the considerations which secretly guided it to establishment, were not are no longer applicable

For tho' every man
with that limitation who keeps Buck Stalls must be
a Man who would take Deer
yet every man who takes Deer
is not a man who keeps Backstalls

The assemblage of Principal & Accessory ies
offences as well with the
subject matter as with the definition of the
taken from the general manner of perpetuation
of the the
————
being to repeal

Hence it is that the punishment of Death which for some time was law for
these offences when while there was no other Law than the practise of the King's ministers and
Judges was thought grievous and the abrogating of it made a point of in that Charter of
Concessions which was an accompaniment equally valuable worthy as it's valued at that time principal to Magna Charta

v Off Prices & Accessy. 1
2
Necessary Categorically, when the there be Accessry
in the nature of things but one road from the lands to the Principal
is to Guilt & no where else; Hypothetically, when it
has two p or more Roads; Co one more leading
to Guilt, & one or more leading to Innocence
but which the Law has been careful to stopage
Reference by description

Another difference between Game & other animals is, that about the latter there is the appearance of labor
bestowed; which is much circumstance in giving title according to the general notions of marked & in connection
in the imagination the of the proprietor with the subject of the property. Where there this the takes place, it is expected
that that thing belong to that person, & men are disposed to acquiesce in its' doing so for a reason which is in some confused not perceived by every one that
were this not the case no Labor at all would be bestowed on any subject at all, & so every man be depended under a
having possessing not only what his own labor might produce but from the various chance of possessing the several privileges

& after all in a
any body would think different
was directly
but

Noting their infirmity & known
and what the of an idle &
loss would be perpetually driving them into
transgression.

THEFT Deer, [6][


Identifier: | JB/070/249/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

249

Info in main headings field

larceny - deer

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23364

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in