JB/095/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/059/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- the top left hand quarter of the page has been cut away --> <!-- top right quarter --> <head>Qualification.</head> <p> To consider this whole provision with attention,<lb/> we must I think confess <del>it to be <add> that neither is the</add> </del> <lb/> contrived so as to be <del> provision in itself very <add>so</add>efficacious</del> </p> <p> that neither are the means provided <add> method adopted</add> to secure<lb/> its' being taken <del>very</del> <add> so</add> efficacious <!-- line to indicate addition of marginal note --> <note>nor the terms <add> effect of</add> it<lb/> very explicit as they<lb/> might be </note> as they might be</p> <p> this expedient for ensuring responsibility is adopted <add> occurred</add><lb/> however</p> <!-- the next paragraph has been heavily crossed through --> <p> It is a topic however that is frequent in the<lb/> Statute Book and in some <gap/> of this a<lb/> <add> who are admitted not the</add> of the <sic>Parliam</sic> <add> House of Commons</add> the Commission of the<lb/> Peace and the protection <add> to a Command</add> is of much more <gap/> <lb/> than it is her.</p>  <!-- the following paragraph has been heavily crossed through --> <p> <note> the several preparations<lb/> into which the provision<lb/> is <gap/><lb/> fall short</note><lb/> we see therefore how for the <gap/> <gap/><lb/> short of consistently are the aforementioned <add> their allowance</add> they establish<lb/> <gap/> [of] some changes of property of the <gap/> <gap/><lb/> of others.</p> <!-- bottom left quarter --> <!-- all marginal text has been heavily crossed through --> <p> <note>In order to show <add>illustrate </add><lb/> the drift of the above remarks<lb/> I cannot forbear<lb/> although they [to give]<lb/> <gap/> of those<lb/> objects <add>products</add> of <gap/><lb/> particularly whose<lb/> <gap/> have met<lb/> with or require<lb/> consideration<lb/> require to be<lb/> kept in view<lb/> in the making <lb/> <gap/> its <gap/><lb/> their <add>ocasion</add> to say as<lb/> this hand is the<lb/> less <gap/> with<lb/> being <gap/><lb/> and <gap/> of <gap/><lb/> <gap/> again<lb/> is <gap/> as <gap/><lb/> there is presumption<lb/> of a <gap/> <add> a <gap/><gap/></add> not<lb/> that there was presumption<lb/> of <gap/> <gap/> ,add> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> &amp; intents</note></p>  
<!-- the top left hand quarter of the page has been cut away --> <!-- top right quarter --> <head>Qualification.</head> <p> To consider this whole provision with attention,<lb/> we must I think confess <del>it to be <add> that neither is the</add> </del> <lb/> contrived so as to be <del> provision in itself very <add>so</add>efficacious</del> </p> <p> that neither are the means provided <add> method adopted</add> to secure<lb/> its' being taken <del>very</del> <add> so</add> efficacious <!-- line to indicate addition of marginal note --> <note>nor the terms <add> effect of</add> it<lb/> very explicit as they<lb/> might be </note> as they might be</p> <p> this expedient for ensuring responsibility is adopted <add> occurred</add><lb/> however</p> <!-- the next paragraph has been heavily crossed through --> <p> It is a topic however that is frequent in the<lb/> Statute Book and in some <gap/> of this a<lb/> <add> who are admitted not the</add> of the <sic>Parliam</sic> <add> House of Commons</add> the Commission of the<lb/> Peace and the protection <add> to a Command</add> is of much more <gap/> <lb/> than it is her.</p>  <!-- the following paragraph has been heavily crossed through --> <p> <note> the several preparations<lb/> into which the provision<lb/> is <gap/><lb/> fall short</note><lb/> we see therefore how for the <gap/> <gap/><lb/> short of consistently are the aforementioned <add> their allowance</add> they establish<lb/> <gap/> [of] some changes of property of the <gap/> <gap/><lb/> of others.</p> <!-- bottom left quarter --> <!-- all marginal text has been heavily crossed through --> <p> <note>In order to show <add>illustrate </add><lb/> the drift of the above remarks<lb/> I cannot forbear<lb/> although they [to give]<lb/> <gap/> of those<lb/> objects <add>products</add> of <gap/><lb/> particularly whose<lb/> <gap/> have met<lb/> with or require<lb/> consideration<lb/> require to be<lb/> kept in view<lb/> in the making <lb/> <gap/> its <gap/><lb/> their <add>occasion</add> to say as<lb/> this hand is the<lb/> less <gap/> with<lb/> being <gap/><lb/> and <gap/> of <gap/><lb/> <gap/> again<lb/> is <gap/> as <gap/><lb/> there is presumption<lb/> of a <gap/> <add> a <gap/><gap/></add> not<lb/> that there was presumption<lb/> of <gap/> <gap/> <add> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> &amp; intents</note></p> <!-- the following paragraph has been heavily crossed through --><p> A certain <gap/> is a certain <del><gap/> <add> <gap/></add> property <add> a little more methodical than<lb/> the one or the other or both <gap/></add> is <gap/><lb/> in <gap/> on his standard of fitness; <del> one subject then<lb/> is that <add> all</add> those which <add> do not</add> come up to it may be excluded<lb/> from that offence, least they <gap/> its powers.  another</del><lb/> that will <gap/> come <gap/> <gap/> <hi rend="underline">may be</hi> admissible<lb/> at least if not he admitted, <gap/> not there <gap/><lb/> he is apt to <gap/> it <add> <add> than <gap/></add> upon that <add> whereupon</add> one direct is<lb/> that the door be <del> not against <add> not open to any</add> those who are <lb/> not fit, another that it <del> may be kept open</del> <add> be not <gap/> against</add> <lb/> <del>to all those</del> <add>any</add> who are <del>otherwise <gap/> doing</del><lb/> is an <gap/> point<gap/>, least <add> not if</add> it be abused.</del> <lb/> <add> as &amp;c</add> <hi rend="underline">measurer</hi> of the powers of the office is <del> <gap/> <gap/> <add> what is</add> <lb/> <add> apprehended</add> and the first case: <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <add> <sic>thro'</sic> want of persons to fill it</add> is the danger in each<lb/> latter: to say nothing of the injustice then <add> done to the persons <gap/><lb/> as come within <lb/> the hand of fitness<lb/> to <gap/> <gap/><lb/> where from<lb/> to say nothing of <lb/> thinking as two that<lb/> there is in the<lb/> excursion to each<lb/> of the persons than who<lb/> is <gap/> within that<lb/> <gap/> fitness, when<lb/> they <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/> would be <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> are objects of desire<lb/> as affording <gap/> for having <gap/>, <hi rend="underline">real</hi><lb/> better: because it can be <hi rend="underline">followed</hi>.</p> <!-- in a box and not crossed through --> <p> because in a <gap/> <gap/> like this, the<lb/> ranks of men except a very few, are determined<lb/> no otherwise than by their fortunes<lb/> These qualities then are assumed as preservatives from<lb/> delinquency</p> <!-- bottom right quarter - all text has been heavily crossed through --> <p> The <del> <gap/> of Qualification Law</del> <add> property of expression</add> is <del><gap/> of</del> <lb/> the Law <add> <gap/></add> <del> as it <gap/> in it</del> the <add> due</add> <gap/><lb/> of the several names to the several species of property <add> possessions</add><lb/> of which names <add><del><gap/></del> </add> which are <add>most</add> current, their <gap/><lb/> <del> now the current names are acquiescent; &amp; those<lb/> which might be substituted in the room of them<lb/> <sic>tho'</sic> <gap/> and <sic>determinated,</sic> would because<lb/> not familiar, be obscure.  provision of itself<lb/> is difficult: but precision &amp; perspicacity <add> both together</add> would<lb/> <del>at least</del> ( for a <add> some</add> time <add> at least</add> be impossible.</p> <p> <del>Possessions</del><lb/> There are 4 main points to be considered.<lb/> 1s<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> how to adapt the <del>expression</del> <add> description</add> of this a species<lb/> to the <gap/> <add> species</add> <gap/> which are meant; 2d<hi rend="superscript"></hi><lb/>how to select these species in <del> <gap/> <gap/> <add> subservience</add> to the<lb/> 1st of these ends, &amp; in  consistency with the <lb/> 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> How to <del>provide effect to</del> <add> give effect to</add> that Will <add> selection</add> by<lb/> contriving that those who are meant to be excluded<lb/> shall <gap/> be excluded.</p> <p> There are three ways of doing this.  I<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> by <gap/>that the actual <lb/> interference shall be <del>[<gap/> to]</del> be<lb/> punished: 2<hi rend="superscript">dly</hi> that the attempt to interfere shall be<lb/> ineffectual.</p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:39, 14 September 2018

Click Here To Edit

Qualification.

To consider this whole provision with attention,
we must I think confess it to be that neither is the
contrived so as to be provision in itself very soefficacious

that neither are the means provided method adopted to secure
its' being taken very so efficacious nor the terms effect of it
very explicit as they
might be
as they might be

this expedient for ensuring responsibility is adopted occurred
however

It is a topic however that is frequent in the
Statute Book and in some of this a
who are admitted not the of the Parliam House of Commons the Commission of the
Peace and the protection to a Command is of much more
than it is her.

the several preparations
into which the provision
is
fall short

we see therefore how for the
short of consistently are the aforementioned their allowance they establish
[of] some changes of property of the
of others.

In order to show illustrate
the drift of the above remarks
I cannot forbear
although they [to give]
of those
objects products of
particularly whose
have met
with or require
consideration
require to be
kept in view
in the making
its
their occasion to say as
this hand is the
less with
being
and of
again
is as
there is presumption
of a a not
that there was presumption
of <add>
& intents

A certain is a certain property a little more methodical than
the one or the other or both
is
in on his standard of fitness; one subject then
is that all those which do not come up to it may be excluded
from that offence, least they its powers. another

that will come may be admissible
at least if not he admitted, not there
he is apt to it <add> than upon that whereupon one direct is
that the door be not against not open to any those who are
not fit, another that it may be kept open
be not against
to all those any who are otherwise doing
is an point, least not if it be abused.
as &c measurer of the powers of the office is what is
apprehended and the first case: thro' want of persons to fill it is the danger in each
latter: to say nothing of the injustice then done to the persons
as come within
the hand of fitness
to
where from
to say nothing of
thinking as two that
there is in the
excursion to each
of the persons than who
is within that
fitness, when
they

would be are objects of desire
as affording for having , real
better: because it can be followed.

because in a like this, the
ranks of men except a very few, are determined
no otherwise than by their fortunes
These qualities then are assumed as preservatives from
delinquency

The of Qualification Law property of expression is of
the Law as it in it the due
of the several names to the several species of property possessions
of which names which are most current, their
now the current names are acquiescent; & those
which might be substituted in the room of them
tho' and determinated, would because
not familiar, be obscure. provision of itself
is difficult: but precision & perspicacity both together would
at least
( for a some time at least be impossible.

Possessions
There are 4 main points to be considered.
1st how to adapt the expression description of this a species
to the species which are meant; 2d
how to select these species in subservience to the
1st of these ends, & in consistency with the
2d How to provide effect to
give effect to that Will selection by
contriving that those who are meant to be excluded
shall be excluded.

There are three ways of doing this. Ist by that the actual
interference shall be [ to] be
punished: 2dly that the attempt to interfere shall be
ineffectual.



Identifier: | JB/095/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

turnpike act observations on

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e49 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial gr crown motif] [partial lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30945

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in