JB/095/079/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/095/079/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- this page has been divided into two columns, each with a margin to the left --> <head>Qualification. III</head> <!-- left hand column --> <!-- the first paragraph is heavily crossed through --> <p> A specific penalty over an above damages &amp;<lb/> costs might then be <gap/> to the party grieved<lb/> by acting in <foreign>bona fide</foreign> under an order thus<lb/> <del>declared</del> <add> rendered</add> invalid.</p> <p><del> It is scarce necessary to observe, that</del></p> <p> <note>for rendering the invalidation<lb/> admissible<lb/> The contrivance here<lb/> we may perceive, is<lb/> nothing more than<lb/> substituting</note></p> <p> a fact easily in the room of one difficulty<lb/> ascertainable as the condition <foreign>sine que<add>a</add> non</foreign> of the<lb/> validity of their transactions</p> <p><del>To make the Acts of a Meeting <add>absolutely</add> void by the intrusion<lb/> of an unqualified person should be productive</del></p> <p> To make the validity of the acts of a <add> transactions of every</add> <gap/> depend<lb/> <add> in every case</add> upon a number <add>collection</add> of facts so obscure &amp; unascertainable<lb/> as the due qualification of <del>the</del> every<lb/> person present at it, would be productive of infinite<lb/> confusion</p> <p><note> viz. before the time<lb/> <del>when</del> for acting under<lb/> the <gap/> &amp;c</note></p> <p>To make the validity of the acts of <del>such</del> a<lb/> meeting at which <add> in the case of their being the bare quorum</add> necessary including<lb/> the intruder <del>if present</del>, <add> depend upon the same condition</add> would be productive<lb/> of similar confusion <del>in a</del> <add> <sic>tho'</sic> less <del>degree</del> <add> frequent:</add> </p> <p><note> which some might<lb/> be apt to think is<lb/> actually done by the<lb/> Act as it is worded.</note><!-- line in ink across the page --> <p> To make the validity of the transactions in either case<lb/> <!-- line in ink across the page --> depend ever upon the part of the <gap/> having<lb/> been taken &amp; subscribed by every one, might be<lb/> thought [<del>rather too</del>] <add>too</add> hazardous, without <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del><lb/> <del> more <gap/> <add> method more certain</add> &amp; expeditious the adoption</del><lb/> same method <del> more secure &amp; expeditious for</del. <add> of</add> ascertaining <lb/> it, which, like that above proposed,<lb/> shall be at once expeditious &amp; secure.</p> <p><note> By this means <lb/> they may make<lb/> certain, of least,<lb/> of all the security<lb/> the Acts can<lb/> give</note></p> <!-- line in ink across the page --> <p> I cannot <add> must not</add> conclude <del>th</del> my <add> the</add> observations on this part<lb/> of the Act, <add> tedious as they may be,</add> without recapitulating <add>calling to mind</add> a few doubts<lb/> which seem to require <del> the solution of</del> <add> to be settled</add> the Legislature <!-- lines appear to indicate the margin note should be included here --> <note> Qualified or<lb/> capable ...).<lb/> <del>that I may not</del> <add> to avoid entering</add> he<lb/> <gap/> note <gap/><lb/> <gap/> [+]</note> I <del>shall</del> <add> will <del>not I may</del> content myself with stating<lb/> them, without attempting their solution, either<lb/> upon the footing of the Act as it stands at present<lb/> or by proposing any additions for the purpose.</p> <p><note> Upon these words <lb/> a few doubts may<lb/> arise, the solution<lb/> to which is not so<lb/> obvious, but that it<lb/> might be of use<lb/> to give it <add> that it should be given</add> by the<lb/> Legislature</note> <p> 1. Whether a <del> <gap/> Interest <gap/> a real subject</del. <add> Man who having once had a</add> <lb/> <del>the</del> <add> proper</add> qualification &amp; having taken &amp; subscribed the<lb/> Oath accordingly, <del>loses it</del> acts after he has<lb/> ceased to have it, becomes obnoxious to the <gap/>.</p> <p> 2. Whether <del>the Cor</del> trustees have any power to<lb/> exclude those of their number who refuse to take<lb/> &amp; subscribe the Oath.  If not what is the force of the<lb/> word capable ?</p> <!-- end of left hand column -->





Revision as of 12:04, 18 September 2018

Click Here To Edit

Qualification. III

A specific penalty over an above damages &
costs might then be to the party grieved
by acting in bona fide under an order thus
declared rendered invalid.

It is scarce necessary to observe, that

for rendering the invalidation
admissible
The contrivance here
we may perceive, is
nothing more than
substituting

a fact easily in the room of one difficulty
ascertainable as the condition sine quea non of the
validity of their transactions

To make the Acts of a Meeting absolutely void by the intrusion
of an unqualified person should be productive

To make the validity of the acts of a transactions of every depend
in every case upon a number collection of facts so obscure & unascertainable
as the due qualification of the every
person present at it, would be productive of infinite
confusion

viz. before the time
when for acting under
the &c

To make the validity of the acts of such a
meeting at which in the case of their being the bare quorum necessary including
the intruder if present, depend upon the same condition would be productive
of similar confusion in a tho' less degree <add> frequent:

which some might
be apt to think is
actually done by the
Act as it is worded.

To make the validity of the transactions in either case
depend ever upon the part of the having
been taken & subscribed by every one, might be
thought [rather too] too hazardous, without
more method more certain & expeditious the adoption
same method more secure & expeditious for</del. of ascertaining
it, which, like that above proposed,
shall be at once expeditious & secure.

By this means
they may make
certain, of least,
of all the security
the Acts can
give

I cannot must not conclude th my the observations on this part
of the Act, tedious as they may be, without recapitulating calling to mind a few doubts
which seem to require the solution of to be settled the Legislature Qualified or
capable ...).
that I may not to avoid entering he
note
[+]
I shall will not I may content myself with stating
them, without attempting their solution, either
upon the footing of the Act as it stands at present
or by proposing any additions for the purpose.

<note> Upon these words
a few doubts may
arise, the solution
to which is not so
obvious, but that it
might be of use
to give it <add> that it should be given by the
Legislature</note>

1. Whether a Interest a real subject</del. Man who having once had a
the
proper qualification & having taken & subscribed the
Oath accordingly, loses it acts after he has
ceased to have it, becomes obnoxious to the .

2. Whether the Cor trustees have any power to
exclude those of their number who refuse to take
& subscribe the Oath. If not what is the force of the
word capable ?




Identifier: | JB/095/079/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

079

Info in main headings field

qualification iii

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30965

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in