★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- this page is divided into 4 quarters --> <!-- top left quarter - the bulk of this quarter is upside down and has been heavily crossed through --> <p>Weighing it, the reader will observe <add> no provision <gap/> was introducing <add> corresponding to that</add> that this word is<lb/> as not warranted <add> to be not worth</add> by any thing in the original <sic>tho'</sic> <add>no</add> purpose<lb/> of the net sum do demand it equally with that which<lb/> follows it. To make amends <add>we have</add> the letter <del>has been inserted</del> <add> given us</add> <lb/> <gap/> over: <add>it</add> having been already inserted <del> <hi rend="underline">at the <gap/> </hi> of <add><del><gap/></del> in the middle of</add> <lb/> a Section as the distance of 43 from this. Variations<lb/>here are indeed between the 2 clauses as usual, then<lb/> it is <add> <gap/></add> the Master or Driver only that was thought of<lb/> here <add> we see</add> it is every body <add> the Master</add> Driver or any body: there the<lb/> penalty is to be 5 £ to a farthing neither more<lb/> nor less: like it may be any thing from 40<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> to<lb/> <gap/> at the discretion of the Justice.</p> <p> If <add> When</add> a Master or Driver were to be informed against,<lb/> for the offence <gap/> & <del>found</del> by the Magistrate were inclined to find him<lb/>more than the £5, it might not be an <add> a very</add> easy matter <lb/> for the Magistrate & the delinquent to settle it <add> the question</add> between them<lb/> whether this could be done or no: the like difficulty <add>then</add> would occur <add> be</add> <lb/> between the Magistrate<lb/>if he<lb/> were proposed to<lb/> fine him less.</p> <!-- end of crossed out and upside down text --> <!-- at the top of the page in normal orientation above the crossed out text --> <p> hang the thread of [human] life <lb/> <!-- line linking to continuation of the text below the crossed out text --> shall be adjudged guilty of felony.<lb/> thinking it enough to hang the man himself without<lb/> starving his wife <add> <gap/></add> and children, licencing all men to<lb/> <sic> commit</sic> murder in his presence, <lb/> or producing any other of those whimsical effects<lb/> which follow upon an offence's belong made felony<lb/> while men think<del>on</del> nothing about the matter</p> <!-- written along the left margin of this quarter and crossed through --> <p> I am sorry the wayward < | <!-- this page is divided into 4 quarters --> <!-- top left quarter - the bulk of this quarter is upside down and has been heavily crossed through --> <p>Weighing it, the reader will observe <add> no provision <gap/> was introducing <add> corresponding to that</add> that this word is<lb/> as not warranted <add> to be not worth</add> by any thing in the original <sic>tho'</sic> <add>no</add> purpose<lb/> of the net sum do demand it equally with that which<lb/> follows it. To make amends <add>we have</add> the letter <del>has been inserted</del> <add> given us</add> <lb/> <gap/> over: <add>it</add> having been already inserted <del> <hi rend="underline">at the <gap/> </hi> of <add><del><gap/></del> in the middle of</add> <lb/> a Section as the distance of 43 from this. Variations<lb/>here are indeed between the 2 clauses as usual, then<lb/> it is <add> <gap/></add> the Master or Driver only that was thought of<lb/> here <add> we see</add> it is every body <add> the Master</add> Driver or any body: there the<lb/> penalty is to be 5 £ to a farthing neither more<lb/> nor less: like it may be any thing from 40<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> to<lb/> <gap/> at the discretion of the Justice.</p> <p> If <add> When</add> a Master or Driver were to be informed against,<lb/> for the offence <gap/> & <del>found</del> by the Magistrate were inclined to find him<lb/>more than the £5, it might not be an <add> a very</add> easy matter <lb/> for the Magistrate & the delinquent to settle it <add> the question</add> between them<lb/> whether this could be done or no: the like difficulty <add>then</add> would occur <add> be</add> <lb/> between the Magistrate<lb/>if he<lb/> were proposed to<lb/> fine him less.</p> <!-- end of crossed out and upside down text --> <!-- at the top of the page in normal orientation above the crossed out text --> <p> hang the thread of [human] life <lb/> <!-- line linking to continuation of the text below the crossed out text --> shall be adjudged guilty of felony.<lb/> thinking it enough to hang the man himself without<lb/> starving his wife <add> <gap/></add> and children, licencing all men to<lb/> <sic> commit</sic> murder in his presence, <lb/> or producing any other of those whimsical effects<lb/> which follow upon an offence's belong made felony<lb/> while men think<del>on</del> nothing about the matter</p> <!-- written along the left margin of this quarter and crossed through --> <p> I am sorry the wayward <add>not to be able</add><lb/> will not <sic>permitt</sic> me to abate any thing of this <del>long &</del> <add> long winded <gap/></add> mysterious jargon<lb/> in which the wayward <add> tortuous</add> torture of our jurisprudence has <sic>envelopped</sic> a<lb/> sentence <add> the suppression</add> which might be as simple as it <add> the <unclear>theme</unclear> </add> is terrible.</p><!-- end of left hand margin text --> <!-- bottom left quarter --> <!-- text upside down --> But it is necessary he should be deemed so before adjudication <add><!-- text in normal orientation --> as to any good purpose it can have</add></p> <p> That I may not have to reproach myself<lb/> with the most remote <add> any matchless probability</add> of having given birth to an event so horrible</add>,lb/> of having given the<lb/> from so alarming a piece of knowledge, I must<lb/>be permitted to observe that there could not be<lb/> the least doubt but <del> an Act of Parliament</del> <add> a Law</add> would<lb/>be made on purpose to restore the competency<lb/> <add> of the witness</add> in such a case, <sic>tho'</sic> it were an expert <foreign>facto</foreign> one<lb/> if necessary (for I knew not <add> previously</add> what author but I believe<lb/> it is Mc Hale who has somewhat started a <lb/> doubt whether it would hold good in respect of<lb/>new created <gap/>)<lb/>& that the incompetency follows not <sic>till</sic> after<lb/> conviction</p> <p> To see a man hung out in a cage for the loss of a <gap/><lb/> could not but cause a man of a sensible frame of mind<lb/> to shudder though his judgement should teach him to <gap/><lb/> the strength of the <gap/> is a sufficient security against a <unclear>fall</unclear><lb/><!-- text continues at right angles --> any man innocent in the eyes<lb/> of the framers of this clause.</p> <!-- end of bottom left quarter --> <!-- top left quarter, all text is crossed through --> <p> <gap/> By Day or Night O. at one o'clock at two a Clock <lb/> at 1/2 after 5 and at 3/4 after 7 — In hot weather<lb/> and in cold in wet weather & in dry .... <del> If this shouts<lb/> <gap/> be necessary, those others are so too</del> — I know how<lb/> this came here <add> <del><sic><hi rend="underline">Willfully</hi></sic> or maliciously</del> it is so plain that it has no business here, <del>that</del> </add> the reason is not worth mentioning.</p> <p> "<hi rend="underline">Wilfully or maliciously</hi>" — O. be <del>even</del> a variety of instances<lb/> we have already seen these <gap/><lb/> <gap/> a disease, we may now see <add>behold</add> them —<lb/> deadly <add> <gap/></add> poison. <add><del>Wilfully</del> is</add> <del><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi></del> The workman <add> therefore</add> who takes down<lb/> these several <add> <gap/></add> articles <add> here specified</add> when old in order to put up<lb/> new does it in his sleep or does it <sic><hi rend="underline">wilfully</hi> </sic><lb/> <!-- line across the page --> <p> <add> in this 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> place</add> <sic>Willfully</sic> is necessarily included in "maliciously" therefore<lb/> it is of no use <add> needless <add> useless</add>. In the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> place d "or" is either<lb/> subjunctive or <sic>subdisjunctive</sic> — disjunctive making<lb/> the passage to mean "<hi rend="underline">either</hi> <add> whether</add> wilfully or maliciously<lb/> subdisjunctive making it to mean <Add. <gap/></add> <sic>willfuilly</add><lb/> i:e: maliciously <Add> as if they were the same</add> Now neither is <sic>willfully</sic><lb/> the same as maliciously nor will it do instead <lb/> of it. [+]</p> <!-- end of crossed out section, text continues into bottom right hand quarter --><p> We had once a Statute <add> have already an instance of</add> <del>to</del> for <add> made</add> no <add>other</add> purpose<lb/> but to turn or <gap/> <gap/> <add> than that of a page or two of words, an or <del><gap/></del> is turned in to one and: this</add> which it</add><lb/> <add>may afford another.</add> <del> performed to the admiration of</del> beholders<lb/> in a manner as simple as the French<lb/> man's machine in Hogarth's carriage <foreign>a la<lb/> mode</foreign> would draw a cart out of a bottle.<lb/> It took not up above a page or two.<lb/> Another such page or two it should seem<lb/> might be at least as well <sic>bestow'd</sic> here</p> <!-- text at right angles is transcribed later with the text from the left margin of this section --> <!-- the next paragraph has been crossed through --> <p> If there be seen case more than another in<lb/> which we are entitled to expect precision it<lb/> is that where the life of man <add> thread of life hangs upon a word</add> <gap/><lb/> accordingly in wordiness the <add> common</add> commodity <add> Statute</add> that passes<lb/> <gap/> instead of precision, this <add> the</add> Section <Add> before us</add> <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <add> abounds <add> <gap/></add></p> <p> Words <add> <gap/></add> accordingly (which the Statute currency<lb/> for precision) are got together in more than<lb/> ordinary <gap/> and with the ordinary success.</p> <!-- end of crossed out paragraph --><p> I will not be so <gap/> <add>It would be <gap/> to <add> give to <gap/></add> as to <gap/> any<lb/> that <gap/> come to any real <add> natural</add> danger<lb/> any <gap/> apprehension</p> <!-- text written in the gap between the two columns in the middle of the page, starting from the bottom of the page --> <p> It would be <sic>uncandid</sic> in me to insinuate, for <add> assuredly</add> & certainly I do not believe, that the loss<lb/> of any man <del>in</del> <add> there's innocent</add> stands on account of this clause in any real danger: but <lb/> the loss of the innocent <add>put</add> in jeopardy, <sic>tho'</sic> it be but apparent, is an <add> alarming and</add> unseemly sight:<lb/> <del>first</del> and must touch a sensible mind as <add> just would view</add> the prospect of a man hung out from<lb/> the top of a lofty tower in | ||
a strong cage, although a little reflection should <lb/> <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add><sic>shew </sic></add> the strength of it, to be such as leaves no room for any real danger of its<lb/> falling.</p> <!-- below this text is a space under the main text --><p> And who can <lb/> <gap/> for the<lb/> effect of a clause<lb/> in which contain<lb/> "the letter <gap/>"<lb/> on an ignorant<lb/> mechanic in whom<lb/> so many case of concurrent<lb/> conspired to in <gap/><lb/> keep up<lb/> <add>so many</add> such formidable<lb/> apprehension<lb/of the Law.</p> <!-- at the bottom of the page to the left of the central space --> <p> produce <add> raise</add> reach<lb/> the same hand<lb/> <gap/> in<lb/> the thoughts<lb/> of which<lb/> insures it<lb/> against any<lb/> possibility <add> probability</add> of<lb/> a fall</p><!-- in the central column in the top half of the page --> <p> Before mentioned — where before-mentioned? In this Section it would <add>the answer would be</add> immediately answer<lb/> but <add>unhappily</add> there is no such things as this Section or as any Section in a Statute as we have<lb/> before observed: under this disadvantage, such would have been preferable to before-mentioned<lb/> because the application of the post is naturally imposed to the last subject at another<lb/> <unclear>assumed</unclear>: whereas the latter Statute is over the whole instrument.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Weighing it, the reader will observe no provision was introducing <add> corresponding to that that this word is
as not warranted to be not worth by any thing in the original tho' no purpose
of the net sum do demand it equally with that which
follows it. To make amends we have the letter has been inserted given us
over: it having been already inserted at the of <add> in the middle of</add>
a Section as the distance of 43 from this. Variations
here are indeed between the 2 clauses as usual, then
it is the Master or Driver only that was thought of
here we see it is every body the Master Driver or any body: there the
penalty is to be 5 £ to a farthing neither more
nor less: like it may be any thing from 40s to
at the discretion of the Justice.
If When a Master or Driver were to be informed against,
for the offence & found by the Magistrate were inclined to find him
more than the £5, it might not be an a very easy matter
for the Magistrate & the delinquent to settle it the question between them
whether this could be done or no: the like difficulty then would occur be
between the Magistrate
if he
were proposed to
fine him less.
hang the thread of [human] life
shall be adjudged guilty of felony.
thinking it enough to hang the man himself without
starving his wife and children, licencing all men to
commit murder in his presence,
or producing any other of those whimsical effects
which follow upon an offence's belong made felony
while men thinkon nothing about the matter
I am sorry the wayward not to be able
will not permitt me to abate any thing of this long & long winded mysterious jargon
in which the wayward tortuous torture of our jurisprudence has envelopped a
sentence the suppression which might be as simple as it the theme is terrible.
But it is necessary he should be deemed so before adjudication as to any good purpose it can have
That I may not have to reproach myself
with the most remote any matchless probability of having given birth to an event so horrible</add>,lb/> of having given the
from so alarming a piece of knowledge, I must
be permitted to observe that there could not be
the least doubt but an Act of Parliament a Law would
be made on purpose to restore the competency
of the witness in such a case, tho' it were an expert facto one
if necessary (for I knew not previously what author but I believe
it is Mc Hale who has somewhat started a
doubt whether it would hold good in respect of
new created )
& that the incompetency follows not till after
conviction
To see a man hung out in a cage for the loss of a
could not but cause a man of a sensible frame of mind
to shudder though his judgement should teach him to
the strength of the is a sufficient security against a fall
any man innocent in the eyes
of the framers of this clause.
By Day or Night O. at one o'clock at two a Clock
at 1/2 after 5 and at 3/4 after 7 — In hot weather
and in cold in wet weather & in dry .... If this shouts
be necessary, those others are so too — I know how
this came here Willfully or maliciously it is so plain that it has no business here, that the reason is not worth mentioning.
"Wilfully or maliciously" — O. be even a variety of instances
we have already seen these
a disease, we may now see behold them —
deadly poison. Wilfully is [+] The workman therefore who takes down
these several articles here specified when old in order to put up
new does it in his sleep or does it wilfully
in this 1st place Willfully is necessarily included in "maliciously" therefore
it is of no use needless <add> useless. In the 2d place d "or" is either
subjunctive or subdisjunctive — disjunctive making
the passage to mean "either whether wilfully or maliciously
subdisjunctive making it to mean <Add. </add> willfuilly</add>
i:e: maliciously as if they were the same Now neither is <sic>willfully
the same as maliciously nor will it do instead
of it. [+]
We had once a Statute have already an instance of to for made no other purpose
but to turn or than that of a page or two of words, an or is turned in to one and: this which it</add>
may afford another. performed to the admiration of beholders
in a manner as simple as the French
man's machine in Hogarth's carriage a la
mode would draw a cart out of a bottle.
It took not up above a page or two.
Another such page or two it should seem
might be at least as well bestow'd here
If there be seen case more than another in
which we are entitled to expect precision it
is that where the life of man thread of life hangs upon a word
accordingly in wordiness the common commodity Statute that passes
instead of precision, this the Section before us
abounds <add>
Words accordingly (which the Statute currency
for precision) are got together in more than
ordinary and with the ordinary success.
I will not be so It would be to <add> give to as to any
that come to any real natural danger
any apprehension
It would be uncandid in me to insinuate, for assuredly & certainly I do not believe, that the loss
of any man in there's innocent stands on account of this clause in any real danger: but
the loss of the innocent put in jeopardy, tho' it be but apparent, is an alarming and unseemly sight:
first and must touch a sensible mind as just would view the prospect of a man hung out from
the top of a lofty tower in
a strong cage, although a little reflection should
shew the strength of it, to be such as leaves no room for any real danger of its
falling.
And who can
for the
effect of a clause
in which contain
"the letter "
on an ignorant
mechanic in whom
so many case of concurrent
conspired to in
keep up
so many such formidable
apprehension<lb/of the Law.
produce raise reach
the same hand
in
the thoughts
of which
insures it
against any
possibility probability of
a fall
Before mentioned — where before-mentioned? In this Section it would the answer would be immediately answer
but unhappily there is no such things as this Section or as any Section in a Statute as we have
before observed: under this disadvantage, such would have been preferable to before-mentioned
because the application of the post is naturally imposed to the last subject at another
assumed: whereas the latter Statute is over the whole instrument.
Identifier: | JB/095/109/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
095 |
|||
109 |
turnpike act observations on xviii |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
30995 |
|||