JB/011/104/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/104/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829 June 16<lb/> Review of J.B. and H.B.</head> <p> (2 <note> <del>Sub reformists classed</del> <add> Anti-Reformists declared</add></note> </p> <p><note>5<lb/> Self preference no<lb/> exception to the rule</note></p> <p> Self preference &#x2014; vulgarly regarded as an exception to the<lb/>general rule, in fact the rule and the exception are<lb/> reversed.</p> <p><note> 6<lb/> Nothing more favourable<lb/> than <add>the</add> light thrown<lb/> upon codification by<lb/> its opponents</note?</p> <p> Nothing can happen more favourably<lb/> for this design <Add>than</add> that it should have the benefit of the<lb/> light thrown upon the subject of Codification by<lb/> the opponents of it.  Sincere altogether is this declaration<lb/> howsoever different may be the construction<lb/> by different persons put upon it.</p> <p> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> <p> To and from the male natural responses to<lb/> <gap/> respecting Lord Eldon <gap/> the heart of<lb/> what is said of the Feegathering <gap/> Statute</p> <p><note>7.<lb/> No sincerity as to<lb/> Law Reform in<lb/> supporters of Eldon's <lb/> fee gathering bill</note></p> <p> Impossibility of supposing sincerity as to Law reform to<lb/> have place in the breasts of any <add> <gap/> man</add> person who contributed<lb?> to that Statute or <sic>staid</sic> silent when it was proposed.</p> <p> Chancery Commission report?<lb/> Per William Walton Esq<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>The control which the courts have over costs,<lb/> will enable them to make many useful alterations<lb/> of their own authority &#x2014; p.634.</p>





Revision as of 10:24, 1 October 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 16
Review of J.B. and H.B.

(2 Sub reformists classed Anti-Reformists declared

5
Self preference no
exception to the rule

Self preference — vulgarly regarded as an exception to the
general rule, in fact the rule and the exception are
reversed.

6
Nothing more favourable
than the light thrown
upon codification by
its opponents</note?

Nothing can happen more favourably
for this design than that it should have the benefit of the
light thrown upon the subject of Codification by
the opponents of it. Sincere altogether is this declaration
howsoever different may be the construction
by different persons put upon it.

To and from the male natural responses to
respecting Lord Eldon the heart of
what is said of the Feegathering Statute

<note>7.
No sincerity as to
Law Reform in
supporters of Eldon's
fee gathering bill

Impossibility of supposing sincerity as to Law reform to
have place in the breasts of any man person who contributed<lb?> to that Statute or staid silent when it was proposed.

Chancery Commission report?
Per William Walton Esqr
The control which the courts have over costs,
will enable them to make many useful alterations
of their own authority — p.634.




Identifier: | JB/011/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-06-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

104

Info in main headings field

review of j & hb

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

george bentham; jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3801

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in