★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>1829. Aug. 18<lb/> Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note> <!-- in pencil -->ult<lb/> X</note></p> <p> <note> Brougham<lb/> 1 Imperfections<lb/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> 1 Partial <gap/><lb/> o</note></p> <p>(1</p> <p><note>1<lb/> "Principles and <lb/> practice" Brougham<lb/> division of the subject<lb/> matter of his speech</note></p> <p>"Principles and practice. By these two words<lb/> as like <del>preliminary</del> "Table" (and a lucid and highly<lb/> instructive one it is) prefix to his speech, he exhibits a<lb/> principle of division <del>which we shall accordingly pursue <add> for which he has not <gap/> used</add> </del><lb/> which he in several parts pursues, and which we<lb/> shall accordingly pursue</p> <p><note>2<lb/> Fundamental principle<lb/> laid down at the close<lb/> of his speech — No<lb/> partial legislation</note></p><p> To begin with <del> his fundamental</del> a principle<lb/> which he deems a "<hi rend="underline">fundamental</hi>" <add>one</add> and which with pleasure<lb/> we acknowledge in that character. Place in which<lb/> he <del>takes it up</del> <add> lays it down</add> the close of this same speech page the <add>112<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></add> 114<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/> of the 120. Place in which we take it up, the first of this our review of that same speech.</p> <p> 3<lb/> <del>No partial Le</del><lb/> This the principle<lb/> laid down by JB in<lb/> his Codification proposal</note></p> <p> <del>By it</del> The fundamental principle for which<lb/> "I contract says he is <add> p112</add> to alter no part of the law by itself,<lb/> "or without considering the other parts!. This is but<lb/> a preliminary allusion: for in the next page but one (page 116) the matter <!-- continues in margin --> is taken up in <gap/><lb/> and the development<lb/> of it <del>takes<d/el> occupies the<lb/> whole page.|</p> <p> This was <del>Mr Bentham's fundamental principle</del><lb/> and for several years has been known to be <del><gap/></del> a fundamental [+]<lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> [+] principle of Mr<lb/> Bentham's. witness<lb/> his Papers relative<lb/> to Codification published<lb/> A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 18 <!-- blank space --> <gap/> and his<lb/> Codification Proposal<lb/> published Ao 182<gap/> <!-- blank space --></p> <p> Be <del>your</del> <add>the</add> body of <del>the</del> your laws (says he) all comprehensive.<lb/> <del>There was</del> Such is the text,<del><gap/></del> <add> on <del>relative to</del></add> which Mr Bentham's<lb/> <add>his</add> "Codification Proposal' <del>published A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 182</del> <add>in particular</add> is as it were<lb/> the sermon: and <add>that</add> in the formation of a body of law, the <add> this</add> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">consideration</hi> of it is involved, may without much fear of<lb/> <del>dissent</del> <add>contestation</add> be averred.</p> <p><note>4<lb/> Brougham's concluding<lb/> motion accordant<lb/> with that principle</note></p> <p>In relation to this fundamental subject matter such<lb/> we see <gap/> Mr Brougham's <hi rend="underline">principle</hi>. In page 120<lb/> that being the concluding one accordant was his <hi rend="underline">practice</hi>.<lb/> In this page we have his Motion which is in the <gap/> following</p> | ||
1829. Aug. 18
Reformists reviewed.
ult
X
Brougham
1 Imperfections
1 Partial
o
(1
1
"Principles and
practice" Brougham
division of the subject
matter of his speech
"Principles and practice. By these two words
as like preliminary "Table" (and a lucid and highly
instructive one it is) prefix to his speech, he exhibits a
principle of division which we shall accordingly pursue for which he has not used
which he in several parts pursues, and which we
shall accordingly pursue
2
Fundamental principle
laid down at the close
of his speech — No
partial legislation
To begin with his fundamental a principle
which he deems a "fundamental" one and which with pleasure
we acknowledge in that character. Place in which
he takes it up lays it down the close of this same speech page the 112th 114th
of the 120. Place in which we take it up, the first of this our review of that same speech.
3
No partial Le
This the principle
laid down by JB in
his Codification proposal</note>
By it The fundamental principle for which
"I contract says he is p112 to alter no part of the law by itself,
"or without considering the other parts!. This is but
a preliminary allusion: for in the next page but one (page 116) the matter is taken up in
and the development
of it takes<d/el> occupies the
whole page.|
This was Mr Bentham's fundamental principle
and for several years has been known to be a fundamental [+]
[+] principle of Mr
Bentham's. witness
his Papers relative
to Codification published
Ao 18 and his
Codification Proposal
published Ao 182
Be your the body of the your laws (says he) all comprehensive.
There was Such is the text, on relative to which Mr Bentham's
his "Codification Proposal' published Ao 182 in particular is as it were
the sermon: and that in the formation of a body of law, the this
consideration of it is involved, may without much fear of
dissent contestation be averred.
4
Brougham's concluding
motion accordant
with that principle
In relation to this fundamental subject matter such
we see Mr Brougham's principle. In page 120
that being the concluding one accordant was his practice.
In this page we have his Motion which is in the following
|
Identifier: | JB/011/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-18 |
1-4 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
115 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3812 |
|||
