JB/104/216/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/216/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/104/216/001" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:14, 8 October 2018

Click Here To Edit

5 July 1810 2
Fallacies

1o or ulto?
Ch. Jephtha's Vow
§.1. Exposition

2

3
Though you did
not then say I
swear, still to better
the argument you afterwards
say — "I swore.

In your answer When the question has been asked you about promising
and swearing, you I in your answer you have taken
care to confine yourself to the p word "promise, omitting
the word "swear." Thereupon Whereupon you are said to
have sworn sworn, and to have taken an oath to
the above effect.




Identifier: | JB/104/216/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1810-07-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

216

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34187

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in