JB/104/238/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/238/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
29 June 1811 1811 June 29 9
Fallacies
 
V. ad superstitionem
Ch. 1. Generalia
§. Exposition or Exposure
§.1. I. Parties
 
1 1
 
9 or 1
Parties capable of
being concerned in an
engagement of the
kind in question &#x2014;
the Sovereign of a state
being in all cases one.
The other
 
In the case here in question <gap/> a species of contract <gap/> an
engagement is by the supposition considered as having place,
and an engagement supposes has parties more parties viz. more than one; and in the case
here in question, of the two parties the sovereign of the state in question is
one.
 
10 or 2
The other may be
a party without the
state, or do within
the state.
 
As to the party it may be either a party whose station is without
the state in question, or a party whose station is within the state.
 
11 or 3
If without the state,
it must be the sovereign
of such <gap/>
state: viz: immediately
or alternately
since without permission
ex<gap/>
from his own sovereign
the subject if any
state can not contract
with the sovereign of
another.
 
If a party without the state this party is either explicitly
or implicitly the sovereign of that such other state. For
if a the case be such that the other party is by the terms of the contract not the sovereign but a
subject of such foreign state, still by the nature of the
case, by the nature of the relation between subject sovereign and
subject in every political state, the subject of the foreign
state can not be bound any further than the as his sovereign is
bound with him. For a by whatsoever tie the subject of a
foreign state is capable of being bound to the sovereign of
our own state the proposed state in question, it can not ever be so strong but that
the tie by which he is bound to the subject of his own
state is still stronger. He therefore can not be bound to
the sovereign of a state other than his own any further than
it is in the pleasure of the sovereign of his own state to permitt
him so to bind himself, and in virtue and to the extent
of such permission to hold himself bound likewise
 
11(a) or 3(a)
Difficulties <gap/><gap/>
of which <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>
is <gap/><gap/> General<gap/>
answer in point of fact,
on each occasion <gap/>
Next 3 lines of this note interlinear with marginal text extension below which however
of punishment over time
 
Horizontal line
Note (a)
(a) The question under concerning who of subjection and sovereignty as between
sovereign and sovereign, i.e. with relation to which of two sovereign
<gap/> given individual is to be considered as subject is a question
of great nicety and <gap/> susceptible of many modifications, and
beset with encompassed by a proportionable number of difficulties. So far as concerns
the
the question matter of fact, the
simplest and it should
seem the truest answer
is &#x2014; On any each given occasion occasion,
and fir any given length of time you are the subject
of that sovereign in whose
power it is on that occasion
and during that length of
time to inflict suffering on
you to the greatest amount.
It is in this way and to this
purpose and extent that each
 
is then greatest.





Revision as of 08:25, 14 October 2018

Click Here To Edit

29 June 1811 1811 June 29 9 Fallacies

V. ad superstitionem Ch. 1. Generalia §. Exposition or Exposure §.1. I. Parties

1 1

9 or 1 Parties capable of being concerned in an engagement of the kind in question — the Sovereign of a state being in all cases one. The other

In the case here in question a species of contract an engagement is by the supposition considered as having place, and an engagement supposes has parties more parties viz. more than one; and in the case here in question, of the two parties the sovereign of the state in question is one.

10 or 2 The other may be a party without the state, or do within the state.

As to the party it may be either a party whose station is without the state in question, or a party whose station is within the state.

11 or 3 If without the state, it must be the sovereign of such state: viz: immediately or alternately since without permission ex from his own sovereign the subject if any state can not contract with the sovereign of another.

If a party without the state this party is either explicitly or implicitly the sovereign of that such other state. For if a the case be such that the other party is by the terms of the contract not the sovereign but a subject of such foreign state, still by the nature of the case, by the nature of the relation between subject sovereign and subject in every political state, the subject of the foreign state can not be bound any further than the as his sovereign is bound with him. For a by whatsoever tie the subject of a foreign state is capable of being bound to the sovereign of our own state the proposed state in question, it can not ever be so strong but that the tie by which he is bound to the subject of his own state is still stronger. He therefore can not be bound to the sovereign of a state other than his own any further than it is in the pleasure of the sovereign of his own state to permitt him so to bind himself, and in virtue and to the extent of such permission to hold himself bound likewise

11(a) or 3(a) Difficulties of which is General answer in point of fact, on each occasion Next 3 lines of this note interlinear with marginal text extension below which however of punishment over time

Horizontal line Note (a) (a) The question under concerning who of subjection and sovereignty as between sovereign and sovereign, i.e. with relation to which of two sovereign given individual is to be considered as subject is a question of great nicety and susceptible of many modifications, and beset with encompassed by a proportionable number of difficulties. So far as concerns the the question matter of fact, the simplest and it should seem the truest answer is — On any each given occasion occasion, and fir any given length of time you are the subject of that sovereign in whose power it is on that occasion and during that length of time to inflict suffering on you to the greatest amount. It is in this way and to this purpose and extent that each

is then greatest.




Identifier: | JB/104/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-06-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

9 or 1 - 11 or 3, 11a or 3a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d9 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34209

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in