★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/011/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/011/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- | |||
<head>1823 Aug. 10.<lb/>Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peel.</note></p> <p>1<lb/>Peel willdo nothing<lb/> against without the Judges<lb/> Judges nothing against<lb/> their own interest and<lb/> prejudice</note></p> <p> Peel. Brougham <gap/> <unclear><hi rend="underline">foils</hi></unclear> to J.B.? <!-- number in pencil --> (1)</p> <p>When one sees the production of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Gill <gap/> <gap/> not <gap/> will<lb/> to which part of his form his intellectual or <gap/> <gap/> <del>like</del> <gap/> <gap/> — the <gap/>-quacking pest</p> <p> In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed<lb/> there. Mr Peel will <add>not</add> bring forward any thing that is not approved<lb/> of by <gap/> the Judges: the Judges <add><gap/></add> will not approve<lb/> of any thing that runs <foreign>contra</foreign> to their <add>won</add> interest and <gap/>-begotten<lb/>and <gap/> begotten prejudices: and nothing that<lb/> of stature is good and now nothing is there that as we<lb/> admire to those same adverse interests</p> <p><note>2<lb/> No intellect for judging<lb/> of his own accord whatever<lb/> intellect he had, <gap/><lb/> by <foreign>Alma Mater</foreign></note></p> <p><del>How much</del> He sits in the lap of these wto Nurses,<lb/> how should he do otherwise. This judging on <gap/> they in<lb/> its own <gap/> no <gap/> does he possess. Whatsoever<lb/> <add>intellect</add> nature gives him as <gap/> <gap/> and resident<lb/> rickety in this perjury — growing <add>nursing <gap/></add> soil of <add>the</add> Alum men</p> <p>If <gap/> a source presents a tolerably instructive<lb/> <gap/> has much more instruction the <foreign><gap/> i<lb/> magistri</foreign>! At his back <add>for every</add> into the published <add> <gap/></add> word, he<lb/> <del><gap/> person as</del> <add> <gap/> in the <gap/> <gap/> from</add> the days of Lord Eldon which better<lb/> could have been expected from him?</p> | |||
1823 Aug. 10.
Reformists reviewed.
Peel.
1
Peel willdo nothing
against without the Judges
Judges nothing against
their own interest and
prejudice</note>
Peel. Brougham foils to J.B.? (1)
When one sees the production of Mr Gill not will
to which part of his form his intellectual or like — the -quacking pest
In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed
there. Mr Peel will not bring forward any thing that is not approved
of by the Judges: the Judges will not approve
of any thing that runs contra to their won interest and -begotten
and begotten prejudices: and nothing that
of stature is good and now nothing is there that as we
admire to those same adverse interests
2
No intellect for judging
of his own accord whatever
intellect he had,
by Alma Mater
How much He sits in the lap of these wto Nurses,
how should he do otherwise. This judging on they in
its own no does he possess. Whatsoever
intellect nature gives him as and resident
rickety in this perjury — growing nursing soil of the Alum men
If a source presents a tolerably instructive
has much more instruction the i
magistri! At his back for every into the published word, he
person as in the from the days of Lord Eldon which better
could have been expected from him?
|
Identifier: | JB/011/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-10 |
1-3 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
139 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3836 |
|||
