JB/104/284/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/284/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1819 Aug. 15 + 7
Fallacies
 
ulto
Ch. Logical High-fliers
§.2. Exposure
 
1
 
9 or 1
Exposure. Proved, by
the use of the fallacy,
whether laudative or
vituperative, the user
deceived or a deceiver
or both.
 
The particular object arrangement
good, to the universal
interest no service
<gap/> by observance
approbation for bad
ones along with it
no service is done to
the universal interest:
but to the particular
interests served by the
bad ones, much service is thus done:
because by this means
approbation may be
obtained for arrangements
too bad to
be defended under
their own names.
 
§.2. Exposure
 
Of a man's being deceived, or of <gap/> an endeavour
on his part to deceive others, or of both these facts together, there can scarcely
be a plainer a more conclusive proof piece of evidence than what is afforded
by the use of this fallacy, <gap/> by the use of it in either of the
above words shapes &#x2014; the laudative or the vituperative
 
If the individual object or species of objects in question
is good, there can be no good use in any <gap/> bestowing laud
upon any genus within which it is contained, if so it be
that in that genus are contained what is bad as well bad and good together
as what is good: and such it will be seen is the case in
all each one of the above seven instances..
 
But, for the purpose of obtaining <gap/> for what in
each such genus is bad that approbation and attachment
which by the supposition is unmerited, and the bestowing entertainment of
which is accordingly an act state of things prejudicial to the universal
interest, that same indiscriminate undiscriminating laudation is not only in every
case a c<gap/> only unquestionably serviceable conducive, but almost in many cases the only one
which is so. [In so far then as this mischievous property
of this instrument in question fails of being perceived by him
by whom it is thus employed, he is himself deceived <gap/> a<gap/> himself under deception: in so
far as it is perceived by him, his endeavour he possesses
the <gap/> consciousness that of the course he is taking
the endeavour is to deceive others.
 
10 or 2
In so far as this effect
of serving as a cloak
for bad arrangements
as facts of being perceived by the
builder utterer of
the laudation or
vituperation, he acts
under <gap/> deception
otherwise he is a self
-conscious deceiver.





Revision as of 07:58, 24 November 2018

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 15 + 7 Fallacies

ulto Ch. Logical High-fliers §.2. Exposure

1

9 or 1 Exposure. Proved, by the use of the fallacy, whether laudative or vituperative, the user deceived or a deceiver or both.

The particular object arrangement good, to the universal interest no service by observance approbation for bad ones along with it no service is done to the universal interest: but to the particular interests served by the bad ones, much service is thus done: because by this means approbation may be obtained for arrangements too bad to be defended under their own names.

§.2. Exposure

Of a man's being deceived, or of an endeavour on his part to deceive others, or of both these facts together, there can scarcely be a plainer a more conclusive proof piece of evidence than what is afforded by the use of this fallacy, by the use of it in either of the above words shapes — the laudative or the vituperative

If the individual object or species of objects in question is good, there can be no good use in any bestowing laud upon any genus within which it is contained, if so it be that in that genus are contained what is bad as well bad and good together as what is good: and such it will be seen is the case in all each one of the above seven instances..

But, for the purpose of obtaining for what in each such genus is bad that approbation and attachment which by the supposition is unmerited, and the bestowing entertainment of which is accordingly an act state of things prejudicial to the universal interest, that same indiscriminate undiscriminating laudation is not only in every case a c only unquestionably serviceable conducive, but almost in many cases the only one which is so. [In so far then as this mischievous property of this instrument in question fails of being perceived by him by whom it is thus employed, he is himself deceived a himself under deception: in so far as it is perceived by him, his endeavour he possesses the consciousness that of the course he is taking the endeavour is to deceive others.

10 or 2 In so far as this effect of serving as a cloak for bad arrangements as facts of being perceived by the builder utterer of the laudation or vituperation, he acts under deception otherwise he is a self -conscious deceiver.




Identifier: | JB/104/284/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1819-08-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

9 or 1 - 10 or 2

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

284

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

exposure

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34255

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in