★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829. Aug. 12<lb/> Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peels Acts<lb/> Act 3/7</note></p> <p> Peels | <head>1829. Aug. 12<lb/> Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peels Acts<lb/> Act 3/7</note></p> <p> Peels talents <del><gap/></del> of the lowest form <!-- numbers in pencil --> (1) (1</p> <p> Act 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> and of 4 7.</p> <p> Imagine the <del>racking <gap/></del> <add>racking tortures</add> with which the<lb/><gap/> of the <gap/> <add> the <gap/> the <gap/></add> reader of this Statute of a man large<lb/> would be <gap/> <del><gap/></del> what tally above what it was<lb/> that <del>if you</del> were at large <add>last</add> to be done to the same cuts. Repealed <lb/> <gap/> and <gap/> express what he would be expecting to be<lb/> seen done with him? If so, then after all disappointment<lb/> what would at least in the first place be the result of the<lb/> landing at the <foreign><hi rend="underline">terra firma</hi></foreign> of the <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> after looking through the sea of <gap/> of <gap/> of<lb/> Act. <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> would for several <gap/> be<lb/> the answer expressed by him. <add>and</add> the path he advanced is<lb/> it the <gap/> and <gap/> would he be turned the suspicion<lb/> that the contents of the <gap/> decreed <gap/> taking<lb/>part was a <add>the</add> <gap/> in <del>which</del> he <gap/> of what all this<lb/>toil would <gap/>.</p> <p> Such would be the feelings of the <gap/> <gap/>. Would<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> Sir, let me <gap/> the learned Gentleman. No indeed<lb/> Sir. no <gap/> at all, he . nothing but what a perfectly <add> easy</add> pleasant<lb/>and agreeable. So he would <gap/> say, so he would<lb/> think of course and so saying, he being the person to whom<lb/> the question <gap/> he could say <unclear>true</unclear> How so? when this<lb/> difference? when so extraordinary a defence? Even from him.<lb/> Associated <del><gap/></del> successfully <gap/> will <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> is this <gap/> so numerous to <gap/> <gap/> by which it<lb/> is applied without this <add> any such</add> <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> additions.</p> <p> Thus has <del>the root of rhubarb been <gap/> to </del> <add>rhubarb root its bitterness notwithstanding</add><lb/> <add> been known to have become palatable to</add> those who have been <del><gap/></del> <add> wont</add> to chew it a <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> against <del>fear of <gap/></del> <add> certain uneasinesses</add> of what the <gap/> is the <gap/></p> <p> From all the vast <foreign> <gap/></foreign> <add><foreign>stereorarium</foreign></add> the <gap/><lb/> <foreign> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> ex re qualibit </foreign> <del><gap/></del> <add><del>which <gap/> <gap/> </del></add> to other<lb/> <add>effects</add><lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> effects <sic>impersceptible</sic><lb/> is still to this effect<lb/> superficially perceived.</p> | ||
1829. Aug. 12
Reformists reviewed.
Peels Acts
Act 3/7
Peels talents of the lowest form (1) (1
Act 3d and of 4 7.
Imagine the racking racking tortures with which the
of the the the reader of this Statute of a man large
would be what tally above what it was
that if you were at large last to be done to the same cuts. Repealed
and express what he would be expecting to be
seen done with him? If so, then after all disappointment
what would at least in the first place be the result of the
landing at the terra firma of the of a
after looking through the sea of of of
Act. would for several be
the answer expressed by him. and the path he advanced is
it the and would he be turned the suspicion
that the contents of the decreed taking
part was a the in which he of what all this
toil would .
Such would be the feelings of the . Would
Sir, let me the learned Gentleman. No indeed
Sir. no at all, he . nothing but what a perfectly easy pleasant
and agreeable. So he would say, so he would
think of course and so saying, he being the person to whom
the question he could say true How so? when this
difference? when so extraordinary a defence? Even from him.
Associated successfully will
is this so numerous to by which it
is applied without this any such additions.
Thus has the root of rhubarb been to rhubarb root its bitterness notwithstanding
been known to have become palatable to those who have been wont to chew it a
against fear of certain uneasinesses of what the is the
From all the vast stereorarium the
ex re qualibit which to other
effects
effects impersceptible
is still to this effect
superficially perceived.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-12 |
|||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
149 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3846 |
|||
