★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1829. Aug. 13.<lb/> Reformists reviewed</head> <p><note>Peel's Acts<lb/> Act 3/7.</note></p> <!-- number in pencil --> <p>(4</p> <p> But suppose for argument sake there was no such power<lb/> what would be the result and practical inference? Answer<lb/> that by the process then pursued — this same process of which<lb/> the destructive name is consolidation, no practical benefit<lb/> nothing of that benefit which it professes to endeavour to<lb/> provide can, in the nature of the case be produced: and<lb/>that in contradistinction to consolidation, and to the exclusion<lb/> of consolidation, the one thing needful and<lb/> the only thing reasonable is — its result — <hi rend="underline">codification</hi>.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1829. Aug. 13.
Reformists reviewed
Peel's Acts
Act 3/7.
(4
But suppose for argument sake there was no such power
what would be the result and practical inference? Answer
that by the process then pursued — this same process of which
the destructive name is consolidation, no practical benefit
nothing of that benefit which it professes to endeavour to
provide can, in the nature of the case be produced: and
that in contradistinction to consolidation, and to the exclusion
of consolidation, the one thing needful and
the only thing reasonable is — its result — codification.
Identifier: | JB/011/152/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-08-13 |
|||
011 |
law amendment |
||
152 |
reformists reviewed |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
1829 |
|||
3849 |
|||