JB/042/730/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/730/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/042/730/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/042/730/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>
1835. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 22</head>
<head>Constitutional Code</head>
<note>Copd</note><!-- previous note in red ink -->
<note>Ch XXVI Local Headman<lb/>S.  Travelling disputes <lb/>settling function <lb/>Instruction</note>
<p>Of the efficiency of any remedy of which the Legislator<lb/>may feel disposed to make the <hi rend="underline">Local Headman</hi> the<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> instrument, the efficiency <del>and <gap/></del><lb/> will <add>naturally</add> depend upon the degree of confidence which<lb/> he may regard <del><add>thereby</add></del> himself as <gap/> in reposing in<lb/>this functionary.  <del>Shall power be judge from</del> To <del>the</del> <del><add>description  of</add></del> persons<lb/><add>of this description</add> in question or any of them to ... them of <del>whom</del> <add>whose conduct</add><lb/>these complications <add>or to ... them</add> and address them to <del>the</del> <add>his person?</add> <del>of this <lb/>functionary?</del> <lb/> <del>functionary?</del>  If yes, what shall be the <add>definite<add>judicious</add> <add>function</add> <del>power</del> exercised by<lb/><del>them</del> <add>him</add> in relation in relation to them? The <hi rend="underline">operation</hi> only? is in addition<lb/>to it, the <del>only</del> sole <add>surely</add> effectual - <add>function</add> the inspiration?  The<lb/> Registrar having, in this case, as in all others, recognizance<lb/>of <del>which</del> <add><del>whatever</del> whatsoever</add> the Headman does, or endeavours to do,<lb/>shall be, <del>or sh</del>  in  <del>consequence</del> <add>consideration</add> of his larger experience<lb/>and probable superiority in respect of <add>appropriate</add> intellectual
<del><gap/></del><lb/><del>a very <gap/></del> possess, <add>in that case</add> with  relation to the  <add><gap/>  of <lb/>the Headman's
<del>in this case  <gap/></del> an effectual negation?<lb/></p>
<p><add>Note that <del><gap/></del> on this occasion</add> The less the confidence reposed, <del>on this <add>sort of</add> occasion
</del><lb/>by the Legislator in these chosen <add>and effectually responsible</add> functionaries, with the<lb/>section of the Public Opinion Tribunal by which they will<lb/>be <gap/>, the greater is the confidence it <del>must</del><lb/> <del>reposed</del> will thereby repose in persons of the <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add><lb/>of whom <del>without</del> <hi rend="underline">collectively</hi> nothing is known, except<lb/>individually they are unknown:
<note>nor let it be forgotten that, to <del>this as to another</del> have supposed  as to any other judication, no <del>proposed</del> persons can bring a proposed defendant, without bringing himself</note>
<del> and <add>note even</add> as to such</del><lb/>to <del>this judicatory no person <add>proposed person</add> can bring before it a <lb/> proposed defendant,</del> without bringing himself before it at the<lb/>same time


<head>1835. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 22<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>


<note>Copd</note><!-- previous note in red ink -->


<note>Ch XXVI Local Headman<lb/>
§. Travelling disputes<lb/>
settling function <lb/>
Instruction</note>


<p>Of the efficiency of any remedy of which the Legislator<lb/>
may feel disposed to make the <hi rend="underline">Local Headman</hi> the<lb/>
<del>with his <gap/></del> instrument, the efficiency <del>and <gap/></del><lb/>
will <add>naturally</add> depend upon the degree of confidence which<lb/>
he may regard <del><add>thereby</add></del> himself as warranted in reposing in<lb/>
this functionary. <del>Shall power be judge from</del> To <del>the</del> <del><add>Description  of</add></del> persons<lb/>
<add>of this description</add> in question or any of them to <gap/> them of <del>whom</del> <add>whose conduct</add><lb/>
these complications <add>or to <gap/> them</add> and address them to <del>the</del> <add>his person?</add> <del>of this <lb/>
functionary?</del> <lb/>
<del>functionary?</del> If yes, what shall be the <add>definite<add>judicious</add> <add>function</add> <del>power</del> exercised by<lb/>
<del>them</del> <add>him</add> in relation in relation to them? The <hi rend="underline">operation</hi> only? is in addition<lb/>
to it, the <del>only</del> sole <add>surely</add> effectual - <add>function</add> the inspiration? The<lb/>
Registrar having, in this case, as in all others, recognizance<lb/>
of <del>which</del> <add><del>whatever</del> whatsoever</add> the Headman does, or endeavours to do,<lb/>
shall be, <del>or sh</del> in <del>consequence</del> <add>consideration</add> of his larger experience<lb/>
and probable superiority in respect of <add>appropriate</add> intellectual
<del><gap/></del><lb/>
<del>a very <gap/></del> possess, <add>in that case</add> with relation to the <add><gap/> of <lb/>
the Headman's <del>in this case possesses</del> an effectual negation?</p>


<p>Note that <add>on this occasion</add> The less the confidence reposed, <del>on this <add>sort of</add> occasion
</del><lb/>
by the Legislator in these chosen <add>and effectually responsible</add> functionaries, with the<lb/>
section of the Public Opinion Tribunal by which they will<lb/>
be <gap/>, the greater is the confidence it <del>must</del><lb/>
<del>reposed</del> will thereby repose in persons of the <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add><lb/>
of whom <del>without</del> <hi rend="underline">collectively</hi> nothing is known, except<lb/>
individually they are unknown:
<note>nor let it be forgotten that, to <del>this as to another</del> have supposed as to any other judication, no <del>proposed</del> persons can bring a proposed defendant, without bringing himself</note>
<p><del> and <add>note even</add> as to such</del><lb/>
to <del>this judicatory no person <add>proposed person</add> can bring before it a <lb/>
proposed defendant,</del> without bringing himself before it at the<lb/>
same time</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:57, 17 December 2018

Click Here To Edit

1835. Decr. 22
Constitutional Code

Copd

Ch XXVI Local Headman
§. Travelling disputes
settling function
Instruction

Of the efficiency of any remedy of which the Legislator
may feel disposed to make the Local Headman the
with his instrument, the efficiency and
will naturally depend upon the degree of confidence which
he may regard thereby himself as warranted in reposing in
this functionary. Shall power be judge from To the Description of persons
of this description in question or any of them to them of whom whose conduct
these complications or to them and address them to the his person? of this
functionary?

functionary? If yes, what shall be the definite<add>judicious function power exercised by
them him in relation in relation to them? The operation only? is in addition
to it, the only sole surely effectual - function the inspiration? The
Registrar having, in this case, as in all others, recognizance
of which whatever whatsoever the Headman does, or endeavours to do,
shall be, or sh in consequence consideration of his larger experience
and probable superiority in respect of appropriate intellectual
a very possess, in that case with relation to the of
the Headman's in this case possesses an effectual negation?

Note that <add>on this occasion The less the confidence reposed, on this sort of occasion
by the Legislator in these chosen and effectually responsible functionaries, with the
section of the Public Opinion Tribunal by which they will
be , the greater is the confidence it must
reposed will thereby repose in persons of the
of whom without collectively nothing is known, except
individually they are unknown: nor let it be forgotten that, to this as to another have supposed as to any other judication, no proposed persons can bring a proposed defendant, without bringing himself

and note even as to such
to this judicatory no person proposed person can bring before it a
proposed defendant,
without bringing himself before it at the
same time



Identifier: | JB/042/730/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-12-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

730

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d35 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

arthur moore

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13653

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in