JB/104/330/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/330/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


4 Aug. 1809 2
<head>4 Aug. 1809 2<lb/>
Fallacies
Fallacies</head>


Conclusion
<note>Conclusion<lb/>
Ch. 4. <gap/> Cause
Ch. 4. <unclear>Relevance</unclear> Cause</note>


2
<p>2</p>


Add any board <gap/> of merit on the part of men causes of
<p>Add <unclear>any</unclear> board men of merit on the part of men c<gap/>ing of<lb/>
no merit.
no merit.</p>


5.
<note>5.<lb/>
3. Irritability &#x2014;
3. Irritability &#x2014;<lb/>
Sympathy and
Sympathy and<lb/>
antipathy are more
antipathy are more<lb/>
strongly created by the
strongly excited by the<lb/>
idea of determinate
idea of determinate<lb/>
individuals than by
individuals than by<lb/>
do of indeterminate
d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of indeterminate<lb/>
do: and by do of smaller
d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>: and by d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of smaller<lb/>
groups than of larger
<sic>groupes</sic> than of larger<lb/>
ones. Presented by
ones. Presented by<lb/>
relevant arguments
relevant arguments<lb/>
persons are prevented
persons are presented<lb/>
on the largest and
on the largest and<lb/>
most indeterminate
most indeterminate<lb/>
groupes,  
<sic>groupes</sic>, commonly<lb/>
the whole community:<lb/>
by those irrelevant<lb/>
ones in smaller<lb/>
<sic>groupes</sic> and more<lb/>
determinate: and in<lb/>
the case of the proposer<lb/>
and supporters of the<lb/>
obnoxious measure,<lb/>
individually.</note>


3. Relevant arguments being drawn in some most instances
<p>3. Relevant arguments being drawn in <del>some</del> <add>most</add> instances<lb/>
if from the consideration of persons, from the consideration of
<add>if</add> from the consideration of persons, from the consideration of<lb/>
persons taken in large and miscellaneously composed
persons taken in large and miscellaneously composed<lb/>
groupes, but also frequently not from the consideration of
<sic>groupes</sic>, but <add>also</add> frequently not from the consideration of<lb/>
persons even thus vaguely designated, but from the mere
persons even thus vaguely designated, but from the mere<lb/>
nature of things, take comparatively speaking no hold
nature of things, take comparatively speaking no hold<lb/>
upon the passions. Personalities, the particular class of
upon the passions. Personalities, the particular class of<lb/>
fallacies here in question operate upon the passions with
fallacies here in question operate upon the passions with<lb/>
a peculiar degree of force. They present frequently most commonly to
a peculiar degree of force. They present frequently <add>most commonly</add> to<lb/>
sympathy an object of that pleasing emotion affection: they present
sympathy an object of that pleasing emotion <add>affection</add>: they present<lb/>
constantly an object to the opposite and though
constantly an object to the opposite and though<lb/>
less pleasing yet not the less <gap/> strong and interesting object
less pleasing yet not the less <del><gap/></del> strong and interesting <del>object</del><lb/>
affection of antipathy. They present in the present case
affection of antipathy. They present in the present case<lb/>
in the persons of those who in a complaisant way would be principally affected by the reforming
in the persons of those <add>who in an unpleasant way would be</add> principally affected by the reforming<lb/>
measure, persons to objects to be attached to, to regard with
measure, <del>persons to</del> objects to be attached to, to regard with<lb/>
affection, to defend, and to protect and to whom defence and
affection, <del>to defend, and to protect</del> and to whose <unclear>defence</unclear> and<lb/>
protection the meanest individual may flatter himself with
protection the meanest individual may flatter himself with<lb/>
the hope of being in some way or other contributory in the
the hope of being in some way or other contributory in the<lb/>
persons of those the supporters of the supposed  
persons of <del>those</del> the supporters of the supposed pernicious measure,<lb/>
fit objects of aversion and disesteem: of aversion
fit objects of aversion and disesteem: of aversion<lb/>
capable of rising to hatred hatred, of disesteem capable of swelling
capable of rising to hatred <add>hatred</add>, of disesteem capable of swelling<lb/>
into contempt
into contempt</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 08:11, 20 December 2018

Click Here To Edit

4 Aug. 1809 2
Fallacies

Conclusion
Ch. 4. Relevance Cause

2

Add any board men of merit on the part of men cing of
no merit.

5.
3. Irritability —
Sympathy and
antipathy are more
strongly excited by the
idea of determinate
individuals than by
do of indeterminate
do: and by do of smaller
groupes than of larger
ones. Presented by
relevant arguments
persons are presented
on the largest and
most indeterminate
groupes, commonly
the whole community:
by those irrelevant
ones in smaller
groupes and more
determinate: and in
the case of the proposer
and supporters of the
obnoxious measure,
individually.

3. Relevant arguments being drawn in some most instances
if from the consideration of persons, from the consideration of
persons taken in large and miscellaneously composed
groupes, but also frequently not from the consideration of
persons even thus vaguely designated, but from the mere
nature of things, take comparatively speaking no hold
upon the passions. Personalities, the particular class of
fallacies here in question operate upon the passions with
a peculiar degree of force. They present frequently most commonly to
sympathy an object of that pleasing emotion affection: they present
constantly an object to the opposite and though
less pleasing yet not the less strong and interesting object
affection of antipathy. They present in the present case
in the persons of those who in an unpleasant way would be principally affected by the reforming
measure, persons to objects to be attached to, to regard with
affection, to defend, and to protect and to whose defence and
protection the meanest individual may flatter himself with
the hope of being in some way or other contributory in the
persons of those the supporters of the supposed pernicious measure,
fit objects of aversion and disesteem: of aversion
capable of rising to hatred hatred, of disesteem capable of swelling
into contempt



Identifier: | JB/104/330/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1809-08-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

330

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34301

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in