JB/095/001/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/001/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
<!-- paragraph appears at end of this first quarter of page -->The impossibility of forming an instrument, that shall at<lb/>
<!-- paragraph appears at end of this first quarter of page -->The impossibility of forming an instrument, that shall at<lb/>
once be a faithful abridgment of another [in which there<lb/>
once be a faithful abridgment of another [in which there<lb/>
is found reason complain of these imperfection which<lb/>
is found reason complain of these imperfections which<lb/>
<gap/> gain admittance into a <gap/> <add>in proportion</add> of which<lb/>
<gap/> gain admittance into a <gap/> <add>in proportion</add> of which<lb/>
as there is the greater demand in it for abbreviation]<lb/>
as there is the greater demand in it for abbreviation]<lb/>
and a remedy for those evils <add><unclear>aspects</unclear></add> which are the natural offspring<lb/>
and a remedy for those evils <add><unclear>aspects</unclear></add> which are the natural offspring<lb/>
of <add>its</add> prolixity will appear when it is considered that<lb/>
of <add>its</add> prolixity will appear when it is considered that<lb/>
An expression which is clear; in no true copy of one that is<lb/>
An expression which is clear; is no true copy of one that is<lb/>
confused &#x2014; a single intelligible <del><gap/></del> <add>clause very inadequately <unclear>represented</unclear></add> is no true copy of<lb/>
confused &#x2014; a single intelligible <del><gap/></del> <add>clause very inadequately <unclear>represented</unclear></add> is no true copy of<lb/>
two clauses that are in contradiction: that a Generic term is<lb/>
two clauses that are in contradiction: that a Generic term is<lb/>
Line 30: Line 30:


<p><note>of the truth of this, <gap/><lb/>
<p><note>of the truth of this, <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <unclear>side</unclear> will be <add>abundantly</add> satisfied <add>I believe find himself</add><lb/>
<gap/> <unclear>side</unclear> will be <add>I believe find himself abundantly</add> satisfied <lb/>
by the notes<lb/>
by the notes<lb/>
as it is, it will however<lb/>
as it is, it will however<lb/>
Line 44: Line 44:
<del>could not <gap/></del> <add>must be excluded</add>, by it's bulk, of representing<lb/>
<del>could not <gap/></del> <add>must be excluded</add>, by it's bulk, of representing<lb/>
the whole scheme at a view.</p>
the whole scheme at a view.</p>
<note>If I had succeeded in<lb/>
representing <add>respect of</add> what (according<lb/>
to my notions of it) was the<lb/>
design, I should have failed<lb/>
in respect of, the execution.<lb/>
The line of right <add><unclear>rectitude</unclear></add> is<lb/>
short [<unclear>&amp; simple</unclear>] but the various<lb/>
deflections from it<lb/>
acquire a long circuit to<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></note>


 
<head>Apology for freedoms</head>
<p>Penetrated with a just sense of what as a subject <add>citizen</add> I owe <add>those</add> [to<lb/>
those active <add>intelligent</add> Senators, who at the expence of so much <add>well-placed industry</add> <gap/><lb/>
have brought the Law on this Title to that degree of perfection<lb/>
at which it rests <add>stands at present</add>.</p>
<note>have carried <add>brought</add> <del>the Law</del><lb/>
<del>on</del> this title <add>of the Law</add> thus<lb/>
far in its progress<lb/>
to perfection</note>
<p>I hold myself not the more under obligation to abate any<lb/>
thing of that freedom which <add>may</add> appears necessary <add>in <unclear>printing</unclear> <gap/></add> <del>to my <gap/></del><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add><gap/> the room there may be &amp; the means</add> to carry it further.</p>
<note>which is necessary to the<lb/>
well executing <add><gap/> of the</add> task which<lb/>
I have set before me.</note>
<p>The prosperity of the State turns upon two great hinges<lb/>
zeal added to <add>guided by</add> sagacity in suggesting <add>discovering</add> what the Laws<lb/>
might be <add>ought to be</add>: &amp; submission, in <add>the mean time</add> obeying them as the <hi rend="underline">are</hi>.<lb/>
may best be<lb/>
<add>These 2 dispositions</add> It is a weakness to imagine <del>them <add>the 2 qualities dispositions</add></del> incompatible; nor can <add>ought</add><lb/>
any <add>or that any</add> degree of the former <add>can</add> be <add>to be <gap/></add> improper, that is <add>not</add> inconsistent<lb/>
with the latter.</p>
<note>The several classes <add>species</add> of<lb/>
redundancy will not<lb/>
be considered <add>treated of</add> methodically,<lb/>
but incidentally<lb/>
as they arise.</note>
<p>I submit it with diffidence <add>resignation</add> &amp; <gap/> ... to experienced<lb/>
Judges, who doubtless <del>will</del> <add>might</add> find imperfections in it<lb/>
enough to <del>give the framers of the original their</del> <add>in the comment to give ample revenge to the framers of</add><lb/>
<del>revenge</del> <add>the text</add>. The more any such an one would condescend<lb/>
to point out, <add>expose if they are few enough to <gap/> it worth the trouble</add> the more he would have any gratitude,<lb/>
[because the more he will have contributed to<lb/>
that public good, which was [the motive <add>object</add> to my labour]<lb/></p>
<p>But who would go to introduce <add>create</add> by voluntary inaccuracies<lb/>
a necessity for licentious construction?</p>





Revision as of 18:44, 1 January 2019

Click Here To Edit TURNPIKE ACT. Prelude

The intended which I had first originally formed
It was my wish first thought, to have rendered the new draught as represented in the whole short form an
exact abridgment of the old; but, if I may be pardoned the fact is it be pardonable
fathom the [often] unfathomable
intention of
the conjurers.
if it be pardon
speak this plain
for speaking out the plain many considerations circumstances rendered as I soon found
it impracticable for me to pursue

The expression so often goes beyond or falls short of,
what appears to me to be the design that a true account
of the one, would be a false one of the other.
The impossibility of forming an instrument, that shall at
once be a faithful abridgment of another [in which there
is found reason complain of these imperfections which
gain admittance into a in proportion of which
as there is the greater demand in it for abbreviation]
and a remedy for those evils aspects which are the natural offspring
of its prolixity will appear when it is considered that
An expression which is clear; is no true copy of one that is
confused — a single intelligible clause very inadequately represented is no true copy of
two clauses that are in contradiction: that a Generic term is
no fit adequate substitute for one or a few of its species only put promiscuously by inattentions
for the whole number.

of the truth of this,
side will be I believe find himself abundantly satisfied
by the notes
as it is, it will however
serve to give
a general notion idea
of it as accurate as
what abridgments often
give; tho' not
accurate enough to
serve as a rule for
practice — with these
with this advantage, from which an abridgment entirely scrupulously faithful
could not must be excluded, by it's bulk, of representing
the whole scheme at a view.

If I had succeeded in
representing respect of what (according
to my notions of it) was the
design, I should have failed
in respect of, the execution.
The line of right rectitude is
short [& simple] but the various
deflections from it
acquire a long circuit to

Apology for freedoms

Penetrated with a just sense of what as a subject citizen I owe those [to
those active intelligent Senators, who at the expence of so much well-placed industry
have brought the Law on this Title to that degree of perfection
at which it rests stands at present.

have carried brought the Law
on this title of the Law thus
far in its progress
to perfection

I hold myself not the more under obligation to abate any
thing of that freedom which may appears necessary in printing to my
the room there may be & the means to carry it further.

which is necessary to the
well executing of the task which
I have set before me.

The prosperity of the State turns upon two great hinges
zeal added to guided by sagacity in suggesting discovering what the Laws
might be ought to be: & submission, in the mean time obeying them as the are.
may best be
These 2 dispositions It is a weakness to imagine them the 2 qualities dispositions incompatible; nor can ought
any or that any degree of the former can be to be improper, that is not inconsistent
with the latter.

The several classes species of
redundancy will not
be considered treated of methodically,
but incidentally
as they arise.

I submit it with diffidence resignation & ... to experienced
Judges, who doubtless will might find imperfections in it
enough to give the framers of the original their in the comment to give ample revenge to the framers of
revenge the text. The more any such an one would condescend
to point out, expose if they are few enough to it worth the trouble the more he would have any gratitude,
[because the more he will have contributed to
that public good, which was [the motive object to my labour]

But who would go to introduce create by voluntary inaccuracies
a necessity for licentious construction?




Identifier: | JB/095/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

turnpike act prelud. i

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30887

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in