JB/104/363/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/363/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


4 Aug. 1809 + + 1
<head>4 Aug. 1809 + + 1<lb/>
Fallacies
Fallacies</head>


Ch. 2. Personalities laudative
<note>Ch. 2. Personalities laudative<lb/>
§.<gap/> Exposition 1809
§.<gap/> Exposition 1809</note>


1
<p>1</p>


Chapter 6
<p>Chapter 6</p>


Ch. 2. Personalities laudative. laudatory.
<p>Ch. 2. Personalities laudative. <del><add>laudatory.</add></del></p>


§.1. Exposition Enumeration and explanation.
<!-- The next 2 paragraphs have been deleted -->
<p>§.1. <add>Exposition</add> Enumeration and explanation.</p>


Pointer symbol See Idolatrous Human Idol worshippers fallacies, Ch. 4, Ins and Ch. 2; and
<p><!-- Pointer symbol --> See Idolatrous <add>Human Idol worshippers</add> fallacies, Ch. 4, Ins and Ch. 2; and<lb/>
Personified Virtue trumpeters fallacy, Ch. 4.
Personified Virtue trumpeter's fallacy, Ch. 4.</p>


1
<note>1<lb/>
<gap/> Personalities laudative
<gap/> Personalities laudative<lb/>
§.1. Exposition &#x2014; 1809
§.1. Exposition &#x2014; 1809<lb/>
That the opposite
This the opposites<lb/>
and counterparts<lb/>
of vituperative</note>


Personalities of this description class are the opposite and
<p>Personalities of this description <add>class</add> are the opposite and<lb/>
in some respect the counterparts of the others.
<add>in some respect the</add> counterparts of the others.</p>


<note>2<lb/>
In practice hav<gap/><lb/>
the shades are each<lb/>
so much dis<gap/><lb/>
&#x2014; not worth while,<lb/>
the <sic>complection</sic> of<lb/>
the argument being<lb/>
so much less strong.</note>


<p>Not that <add>in practice</add> the shades and modifications of the argument<lb/>
<add>commonly employed</add> are in this case so numerous as in that other. Of those<lb/>
which we have seen <add>may so continually be seen</add> employed in that case there is<lb/>
no one that is not capable of being employed, there is<lb/>
no <del>one</del> <add>one</add> perhaps that has not sometimes been employed<lb/>
in this. But in this case the <del><gap/></del> <sic>complection</sic> of the<lb/>
argument is so much less strong that in that, that<lb/>
in this case the shades or <add>the</add> modifications <add>the distinction between the shade and shade</add> is scarce<lb/>
worth noticing. .</p> <!-- Vertical line -->
<note>3<lb/>
The object of the argument<lb/>
being to oppose<lb/>
a proposed change<lb/>
the persons to be lauded<lb/>
will be official persons<lb/>
in p<gap/>, and them<lb/>
supposed perhaps on all<lb/>
points will be employed<lb/>
as circumstantial<lb/>
presumptive<lb/>
evidence of<lb/>
the goodness of <gap/><lb/>
existing <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
defend thence the<lb/>
needlessness <add>inefficiency</add> or un<gap/><lb/>
of <gap/><lb/>
any proposed change</note>
<p>One expression will serve for all of them <add>to include them all</add>,<lb/>
the <del>virtues</del> excellence in every point of view, moral<lb/>
and <add>as well as</add> intellectual intellectual as well as moral, of the character<lb/>
(meaning the disposition <add>frame of mind</add>) of the <add>certain</add> persons in question.<lb/>
<add>But</add> Of what persons? Of persons of that description which<lb/>
is opposite <add>stands opposed</add> to the description of the persons concerned in<lb/>
that other case. In that other case, the persons, the<lb/>
supposed <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> imperfection in whose <del>description</del> <add>character and disposition</add> were employed<lb/>
in the character of <del><gap/></del> evidence circumstantial evidence<lb/>
<add>of the badness</add> of the measure in question, <add>it being a measure of <sic>alledged</sic> reform or improvement</add> were the persons engaged<lb/>
in the support of that [innovating] measure, in the present<lb/>
case the persons <del>whose</del> <add>the</add> <sic>alledged</sic> <del><gap/></del> excellencies in<lb/>
whose character are employed in the character of evidence<lb/>
&#x2014; circumstantial evidence &#x2014; of the badness of this innovating<lb/>
measure, are the persons in whose <add>situation and</add> conduct <del>and</del><lb/>
situation it would be productive of some <del><add><gap/></add></del> change, and who<lb/>
the change not being agreeable to the, are understood <add>seen</add> or
supposed or expected as a matter of course, to regard it with<lb/>
<add><sic>displeasurer</sic></add><lb/>
<note>displeasure, and<lb/>
accordingly to oppose<lb/>
it.</note></p>





Revision as of 07:36, 11 January 2019

Click Here To Edit

4 Aug. 1809 + + 1
Fallacies

Ch. 2. Personalities laudative
§. Exposition 1809

1

Chapter 6

Ch. 2. Personalities laudative. laudatory.

§.1. Exposition Enumeration and explanation.

See Idolatrous Human Idol worshippers fallacies, Ch. 4, Ins and Ch. 2; and
Personified Virtue trumpeter's fallacy, Ch. 4.

1
Personalities laudative
§.1. Exposition — 1809
This the opposites
and counterparts
of vituperative

Personalities of this description class are the opposite and
in some respect the counterparts of the others.

2
In practice hav
the shades are each
so much dis
— not worth while,
the complection of
the argument being
so much less strong.

Not that in practice the shades and modifications of the argument
commonly employed are in this case so numerous as in that other. Of those
which we have seen may so continually be seen employed in that case there is
no one that is not capable of being employed, there is
no one one perhaps that has not sometimes been employed
in this. But in this case the complection of the
argument is so much less strong that in that, that
in this case the shades or the modifications the distinction between the shade and shade is scarce
worth noticing. .

3
The object of the argument
being to oppose
a proposed change
the persons to be lauded
will be official persons
in p, and them
supposed perhaps on all
points will be employed
as circumstantial
presumptive
evidence of
the goodness of
existing
defend thence the
needlessness inefficiency or un
of
any proposed change

One expression will serve for all of them to include them all,
the virtues excellence in every point of view, moral
and as well as intellectual intellectual as well as moral, of the character
(meaning the disposition frame of mind) of the certain persons in question.
But Of what persons? Of persons of that description which
is opposite stands opposed to the description of the persons concerned in
that other case. In that other case, the persons, the
supposed alledged imperfection in whose description character and disposition were employed
in the character of evidence circumstantial evidence
of the badness of the measure in question, it being a measure of alledged reform or improvement were the persons engaged
in the support of that [innovating] measure, in the present
case the persons whose the alledged excellencies in
whose character are employed in the character of evidence
— circumstantial evidence — of the badness of this innovating
measure, are the persons in whose situation and conduct and
situation it would be productive of some change, and who
the change not being agreeable to the, are understood seen or supposed or expected as a matter of course, to regard it with
displeasurer
displeasure, and
accordingly to oppose
it.




Identifier: | JB/104/363/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1819-08-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

363

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

personalities /laudative/laudatory / exposition

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34334

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in