JB/057/072/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/072/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- date, heading and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<!-- date, heading and marginal summaries in pencil -->


<p>30 May 1804 5</p> <head> <del>Evidence</del> <add>Procedure</add></head> <p><note><sic>Ch. Justiciability</sic></note></p> <p> <note> 13<lb/. It is on the assistance of<lb/> the defendant that <sic>justiciability</sic><lb/> requires the<lb/> greatest exertions on the<lb/> part of the legislator<lb/>be as being <add>the</add> most difficult<lb/> to accomplish<lb/> the difficulty <sic>encreasing</sic><lb/> with the repugnance of<lb/> the <sic>def<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> and that with<lb/> the apprehended suffering.</note></p> <p> Of the two objects, it is at the same time evident enough that <lb/>it is the direct object &#x2014; the <sic>justiciability</sic> of the defendant that is<lb/> the most important, and that which for its accomplishing <add>the securing of it</add> requires<lb/> the greatest attention and exertion on the part of the legislator.  The<lb/> exertions which the defendant <add>sacrifice and exertion of all hands/ in all sorts of ways</add> which the defendant will make to escape it are susceptible<lb/> of every degree of magnitude: they depend on the suffering which<lb/>the defendant has to apprehend in case of their being <add>proving</add> ineffectual<lb/> and these are susceptible of every degree from <gap/> from that<lb/> which is the result of the most inconsiderable <del><gap/></del> pecuniary loss to that<lb/> of the severest degree of punishment.</p> <p><note>14<lb/> 2 <gap/> as the<lb/> failure of <sic>justiciability</sic>,<lb/> being failure<lb/> of justice, is attached<lb/> with the greatest inconvenience.</note></p> <p> The importance of the mischief resulting from failure of <sic>justiciability</sic> <lb/> varies in the same degree and rises to the same height.<lb/> Failure of <sic>justiciability</sic> <add> so far as it is <sic>compleat</sic>,</add> in its immediate and necessary<lb/> consequences neither more nor less than failure of justice &#x2014; of<lb/> direct justice: impunity in penal cause, loss of right &#x2014; of the <lb/> particular right in question, in a penal cause.</p>  <p><note>1<del>2</del>5<lb/> The plaintiff can<lb/> not do any thing towards<lb/> securing the justiciability<lb/> of the defendant, without<lb/> <del><gap/></del> affording for his<lb/> own <sic>justiciability</sic> whatever<lb/> security the<lb/> Judge thinks fit to<lb/> prescribe.</note></p> <!-- next paragraph crossed out in pencil --> <p> On the side of the plaintiff, the scale of importance has<lb/> not in either respect <add> near</add> so wide <del><gap/></del> a range.  <del> In a purely<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> he has not any personal satisfaction to</del> <lb/> <del>call for [at the charge of the defendant] <add> on his <gap/> own account</add> &#x2014; in which all he<lb/> has to gain is the satisfaction <add>pleasure</add> of succeeding in his endeavour to<lb/> bring <gap/> punishment <gap/> the <gap/> of the defendant.</del></p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p> <del>that</del> Defendant altogether for the success of his exertions are the cooperation<lb?> of the Judge, he can <del>not secure</del> do nothing effectual<lb/> towards securing <del>the f</del> <sic>justiciability</sic> on the part of the defendant<lb/> without putting himself under the orders of the Judge, and submitting<lb/> to whatever obligations <add>any be</add> the Judge be regarded as necessary<lb/> to secure his (the <sic>plffs</sic>) <del>fa</del> <sic>justiciability</sic> in favour of <add> for the benefit and security</add> the defendant.</p>   
<p>30 May 1804 5</p> <head> <del>Evidence</del> <add>Procedure</add></head> <p><note><sic>Ch. Justiciability</sic></note></p> <p> <note> 13<lb/> It is on the instance of<lb/> the defendant that <sic>justiciability</sic><lb/> requires the<lb/> greatest exertions on the<lb/> part of the legislator<lb/>be as being <add>the</add> most difficult<lb/> to accomplish<lb/> the difficulty <sic>encreasing</sic><lb/> with the repugnance of<lb/> the <sic>def<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> and that with<lb/> the apprehended suffering.</note></p> <p> Of the two objects, it is at the same time evident enough that <lb/>it is the direct object &#x2014; the <sic>justiciability</sic> of the defendant that is<lb/> the most important, and that which for its accomplishing <add>the securing of it</add> requires<lb/> the greatest attention and exertion on the part of the legislator.  The<lb/> exertions which the defendant <add>sacrifices and exertions of all kinds/ in all sorts of ways</add> which the defendant will make to escape it are susceptible<lb/> of every degree of magnitude: they depend on the suffering which<lb/>the defendant has to apprehend in case of their being <add>proving</add> ineffectual<lb/> and these are susceptible of every degree from intensity from that<lb/> which is the result of the most inconsiderable <del><gap/></del> pecuniary loss to that<lb/> of the severest degree of punishment.</p> <p><note>14<lb/> 2 inasmuch as the<lb/> failure of <sic>justiciability</sic>,<lb/> being failure<lb/> of justice, is attached<lb/> with the greatest inconvenience.</note></p> <p> The importance of the mischief resulting from failure of <sic>justiciability</sic> <lb/> varies in the same degree and rises to the same height.<lb/> Failure of <sic>justiciability</sic> <add> so far as it is <sic>compleat</sic>,</add> in its immediate and necessary<lb/> consequences neither more nor less than failure of justice &#x2014; of<lb/> direct justice: impunity in penal cause, loss of right &#x2014; of the <lb/> particular right in question, in a penal cause.</p>  <p><note>1<del>2</del>5<lb/> The plaintiff can<lb/> not do any thing towards<lb/> securing the justiciability<lb/> of the defendant, without<lb/> <del>render</del> affording for his<lb/> own <sic>justiciability</sic> whatever<lb/> security the<lb/> Judge thinks fit to<lb/> prescribe.</note></p> <!-- next paragraph crossed out in pencil --> <p> On the side of the plaintiff, the scale of importance has<lb/> not in either respect <add> near</add> so wide <del><gap/></del> a range.  <del> In a purely<lb/>penal <gap/> of punishment he has not any personal satisfaction to</del> <lb/> <del>call for [at the charge of the defendant] <add> on his <gap/> own account</add> &#x2014; in which all he<lb/> has to gain is the satisfaction <add>pleasure</add> of succeeding in his endeavour to<lb/> bring <gap/> punishment <gap/> the <gap/> of the defendant.</del></p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p> <del>that</del> Dependant altogether for the success of his exertions are the cooperation<lb/> of the Judge, he can <del>not secure</del> do nothing effectual<lb/> towards securing <del>the f</del> <sic>justiciability</sic> on the part of the defendant<lb/> without putting himself under the orders of the Judge, and submitting<lb/> to whatever obligations <add>may be</add> the Judge be regarded as necessary<lb/> to secure his (the <sic>plffs</sic>) <del>fa</del> <sic>justiciability</sic> in favour of <add> for the benefit and security</add> the defendant.</p>   


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:18, 27 January 2019

Click Here To Edit


30 May 1804 5

Evidence Procedure

Ch. Justiciability

13
It is on the instance of
the defendant that justiciability
requires the
greatest exertions on the
part of the legislator
be as being the most difficult
to accomplish
the difficulty encreasing
with the repugnance of
the deft and that with
the apprehended suffering.

Of the two objects, it is at the same time evident enough that
it is the direct object — the justiciability of the defendant that is
the most important, and that which for its accomplishing the securing of it requires
the greatest attention and exertion on the part of the legislator. The
exertions which the defendant sacrifices and exertions of all kinds/ in all sorts of ways which the defendant will make to escape it are susceptible
of every degree of magnitude: they depend on the suffering which
the defendant has to apprehend in case of their being proving ineffectual
and these are susceptible of every degree from intensity from that
which is the result of the most inconsiderable pecuniary loss to that
of the severest degree of punishment.

14
2 inasmuch as the
failure of justiciability,
being failure
of justice, is attached
with the greatest inconvenience.

The importance of the mischief resulting from failure of justiciability
varies in the same degree and rises to the same height.
Failure of justiciability so far as it is compleat, in its immediate and necessary
consequences neither more nor less than failure of justice — of
direct justice: impunity in penal cause, loss of right — of the
particular right in question, in a penal cause.

125
The plaintiff can
not do any thing towards
securing the justiciability
of the defendant, without
render affording for his
own justiciability whatever
security the
Judge thinks fit to
prescribe.

On the side of the plaintiff, the scale of importance has
not in either respect near so wide a range. In a purely
penal of punishment he has not any personal satisfaction to

call for [at the charge of the defendant] on his own account — in which all he
has to gain is the satisfaction pleasure of succeeding in his endeavour to
bring punishment the of the defendant.

that Dependant altogether for the success of his exertions are the cooperation
of the Judge, he can not secure do nothing effectual
towards securing the f justiciability on the part of the defendant
without putting himself under the orders of the Judge, and submitting
to whatever obligations may be the Judge be regarded as necessary
to secure his (the plffs) fa justiciability in favour of for the benefit and security the defendant.



Identifier: | JB/057/072/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1804-05-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

13-15

Box

057

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

072

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::[evidence deleted] procedure]]

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18402

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in