JB/104/393/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/393/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>11 July 1810 6<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
 
<note>Ch. Diversion-creating<lb/>
§.3. Instructions for framing<lb/>
<gap/></note>
 
<p>2</p>
 
<p><!-- This paragraph has been struck through -->
Compared with <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>a diversion-creating</add> argument, a diversion creating<lb/>
measure has moreover this <add>a constant</add> disadvantage, viz. the <add><del><gap/></del> which consist in</add><lb/>
superior <add>greater</add> portion of time and labour the consumption of which<lb/>
it necessitates.</p>
 
<note>7 or 3<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> advantage<lb/>
of diversion-creating<lb/>
measure in comparison<lb/>
of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> argument &#x2014;<lb/>
greater consumption<lb/>
of time and labour.</note>
 
<p><!-- This paragraph has been struck through -->
There are <add>different</add> ways of <del>opposition</del> employing <add>applying</add> measures<lb/>
of diversion in opposition to measure of reform<lb/>
of opposing <add>combating</add> measures of reform by <add>counter-</add>measures of diversion</p>
 
<note>8 or 4<lb/>
Modes of operating<lb/>
by diversion-creating<lb/>
measures.<lb/>
I. Irrelevant d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>, as <lb/>
above.<lb/>
II. Relevant counter<lb/>
measures</note>
 
<p>First comes the distinction between <add>This brings us to the distinction between</add> <hi rend="underline">irrelevant</hi> measures<lb/>
of diversion or counter measures, and <hi rend="underline">relevant</hi><lb/>
ones</p>
 
<p>What <del>to a <gap/></del> is understood by an irrelevant<lb/>
measure of diversion has already <add>just</add> been explained.<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> Where <del><gap/></del> there can be any prospect of its efficacy<lb/>
it is <del>in several <gap/></del> manifestly much more eligible<lb/>
than a relevant counter-measure, and that<lb/>
on several accounts.</p>
 
<note>9 or 5<lb/>
I. Advantage of <add>an</add> irrelevant<lb/>
measure<lb/>
1. No such rise of partial<lb/>
reform as in case<lb/>
of <add>a</add> relevant counter-<lb/>
measure</note>
 
<p>1. By <add>Of</add> any relevant counter measure, a risk <del>would</del> <add>the consequence would be</add><lb/>
more or less considerable of seeing the <del><gap/></del> abuse or imperfection<lb/>
in question receive in a more or less considerable<lb/>
degree a <add>an efficient</add> remedy undergo consequently<lb/>
a diminution, whereby the object in view <add>aimed at</add> in and<lb/>
by the counter-measure would in a proportionable<lb/>
degree be sacrificed: [an inconvenience in respect<lb/>
of which a relevant counter measure is in a particular degree<lb/>
ineligible in comparison of a diversion creating counter argument.</p>
 
<note>10 or 6<lb/>
2. No such difficulty<lb/>
as in the case where<lb/>
a choice is to be made<lb/>
as between relevant<lb/>
countermeasures.<lb/>
Among irrelevant ones<lb/>
any may serve.</note>
 
<p>2. In the choice of a relevant counter-measure,<lb/>
according to the nature of the case, that is <del>of the</del> according<lb/>
to the nature of the abuse or other imperfection by which the<lb/>
demand for a remedial measure is created, there may<lb/>
be a degree of difficulty more or less considerable: whereas<lb/>
for performing the office of an irrelevant counter-measure<lb/>
any measure without exception, so that it can but be so<lb/>
ordered ass to steal from the obnoxious measure of reform, the<lb/>
whole or any part of the time and labour necessary for<lb/>
<add>its</add><lb/>
<note>its effectuation may be<lb/>
made to serve <add>(a)</add>.</note></p>
 
<note>10<add>(a)</add> or 6<add>(a)</add><lb/>
[In a Note state<lb/>
D. of Yorks case<lb/>
and <unclear>Prodets</unclear> imprisonment<lb/>
as countermeasure<lb/>
to Watcher<gap/> acc<gap/><lb/>
and Parliamentary Reform.]</note>
 
<note>Note <add>(a)</add><lb/>
(a) Note stating <unclear>Puerdett</unclear><lb/>
imprisonment as a supposed<lb/>
countermeasure to par<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>. reform.</note>





Revision as of 09:03, 28 January 2019

Click Here To Edit

11 July 1810 6
Fallacies

Ch. Diversion-creating
§.3. Instructions for framing

2

Compared with a diversion-creating argument, a diversion creating
measure has moreover this a constant disadvantage, viz. the which consist in
superior greater portion of time and labour the consumption of which
it necessitates.

7 or 3
advantage
of diversion-creating
measure in comparison
of do argument —
greater consumption
of time and labour.

There are different ways of opposition employing applying measures
of diversion in opposition to measure of reform
of opposing combating measures of reform by counter-measures of diversion

8 or 4
Modes of operating
by diversion-creating
measures.
I. Irrelevant do, as
above.
II. Relevant counter
measures

First comes the distinction between This brings us to the distinction between irrelevant measures
of diversion or counter measures, and relevant
ones

What to a is understood by an irrelevant
measure of diversion has already just been explained.
Where there can be any prospect of its efficacy
it is in several manifestly much more eligible
than a relevant counter-measure, and that
on several accounts.

9 or 5
I. Advantage of an irrelevant
measure
1. No such rise of partial
reform as in case
of a relevant counter-
measure

1. By Of any relevant counter measure, a risk would the consequence would be
more or less considerable of seeing the abuse or imperfection
in question receive in a more or less considerable
degree a an efficient remedy undergo consequently
a diminution, whereby the object in view aimed at in and
by the counter-measure would in a proportionable
degree be sacrificed: [an inconvenience in respect
of which a relevant counter measure is in a particular degree
ineligible in comparison of a diversion creating counter argument.

10 or 6
2. No such difficulty
as in the case where
a choice is to be made
as between relevant
countermeasures.
Among irrelevant ones
any may serve.

2. In the choice of a relevant counter-measure,
according to the nature of the case, that is of the according
to the nature of the abuse or other imperfection by which the
demand for a remedial measure is created, there may
be a degree of difficulty more or less considerable: whereas
for performing the office of an irrelevant counter-measure
any measure without exception, so that it can but be so
ordered ass to steal from the obnoxious measure of reform, the
whole or any part of the time and labour necessary for
its
its effectuation may be
made to serve (a).

10(a) or 6(a)
[In a Note state
D. of Yorks case
and Prodets imprisonment
as countermeasure
to Watcher acc
and Parliamentary Reform.]

Note (a)
(a) Note stating Puerdett
imprisonment as a supposed
countermeasure to part. reform.




Identifier: | JB/104/393/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-07-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

7 or 3 - 10 or 6, 10a or 6a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

393

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34364

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in