★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>C<lb/> PROCEDURE. <sic>Miscell.</sic></head> | |||
<p><note>21</note></p> <!-- 'Posted' in red ink --> <p><note>Posted <lb/> Formula</note></p> <p><hi rend="underline">I deny</hi> instead of without that<lb/> <hi rend="underline">I do not admit</hi> instead of because protesting</p> <p> <hi rend="underline">I</hi> instead of he the <add>said</add> <sic>Plff</sic> or she the <add>said</add> <sic>Plff</sic><lb/> or they the said <sic>Plffs</sic></p> <p> The Pronoun of the third person applies indifferently<lb/> to both, and therefore to distinguish<lb/> one from <sic>t'other</sic> requires perpetual repetitions</p> <!-- line across the page in ink. The remainder of the page is crossed though in red ink --> <p><note>No hardship to<lb/> Lawyers to change<lb/> Jargon for Common<lb/>Sense.</note></p> <p><add>Do</add> [The proof of their understanding] their <del>technical</del> <add><del> language</del> jargon</add><lb/> <del>language</del> <add> of their own, do they really understand it?</add> is their being able to render it into<lb/> such language as is now in use with other people.<lb/> <del>popular with the <gap/></del></p> | |||
<p> If then it</p> <!-- next paragraph in red ink --> <p>Names of <gap/> are upon a different footing — —<lb/> every thing must have a name, and if the<lb/> thing be new <add> irregular</add> the name be must be singular</p> | |||
<p> How this language then should be new <add>strange</add> or difficult<lb/> to them is not easy to conceive,<lb/>unless <add> the case is that</add> a man by learning <del>Jurisprudence</del> <add>Law</add><lb/><del>unless</del> unlearns every thing that he had learnt<lb/> before: and unless the day which <sic>dubbs</sic> him<lb/> a Lawyer <sic>robbs</sic> him of all his common<lb/> sense, as the day which makes a man a<lb/> slave is said to do all of half his virtue.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
C
PROCEDURE. Miscell.
21
Posted
Formula
I deny instead of without that
I do not admit instead of because protesting
I instead of he the said Plff or she the said Plff
or they the said Plffs
The Pronoun of the third person applies indifferently
to both, and therefore to distinguish
one from t'other requires perpetual repetitions
No hardship to
Lawyers to change
Jargon for Common
Sense.
Do [The proof of their understanding] their technical language jargon
language of their own, do they really understand it? is their being able to render it into
such language as is now in use with other people.
popular with the
If then it
Names of are upon a different footing — —
every thing must have a name, and if the
thing be new irregular the name be must be singular
How this language then should be new strange or difficult
to them is not easy to conceive,
unless the case is that a man by learning Jurisprudence Law
unless unlearns every thing that he had learnt
before: and unless the day which dubbs him
a Lawyer robbs him of all his common
sense, as the day which makes a man a
slave is said to do all of half his virtue.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/014/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
014 |
c procedure miscell. |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f21 / f22 / / f24 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia with lion motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"posted" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
18344 |
||
