★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- date, heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <p>1805</p> <head><del>Evidence</del> Procedure</head> <p><note>Jury</note></p> <p>1<lb/> Jury — its true non<lb/> are physic — not as food</note></p> <p>The true use of the institution of Juries seems very apt to be<lb/> misunderstood: <!-- brackets in pencil --> [the use of it <add> to the judiciary system</add> as of is rather in the character of evidence<lb/> than of food.] Employed in its true character and <gap/> it<lb/> gives a degree of <add> wealth of</add> perfection to the system such as can never be<lb/> given to it by any other means: but the character in which it<lb/> is really of use seems rather to be that of <add>occasional </add> medium than <add>daily</add> food.<lb/> How many lives are every day saved, <add> how many <sic>afflictive</sic>/cruel diseases banished</add> by mercury, bark <add> <sic><unclear>quinquisia</unclear></sic></add> and <add>antimony</add><lb/>opium? Is it any disparagement to the virtues of these <add>incomparable</add> admirable<lb/> medicines, to say that they would prove but indifferent. absolutely<lb/>to bread or potatoes?</p> <p><note> The relief offered by<lb/> Courts of Conscience<lb/> would be <gap/> by <del>Jury<lb/> trial</del> introduction of Juries</note></p> <p>Substitute Trial by Jury to the natural and summary mode<lb/> of procedure employed <add> pursued</add> in the Courts of Conscience: what vexation<lb/> what denial of justice would such a change produce <add> be the result of such a change!</add> </p> <p><note> <del>A</del> Jury is of no use<lb/> but as an antidote<lb/> to <sic>improbity</sic> in a Judge<lb/> his <sic>improbity</sic> of intellectual<lb/> <del><gap/></del> qualifications<lb/>can be expected from<lb/> them.</note></p> <p>The use and only use of the institution of a Jury is to<lb/> serve as an <add>in the character of</add> an antidote <add>as an antidote</add> to the poison of <sic>improbity</sic> in the <gap><lb/> of the professional Judge. <del>It is</del> Suppose your Judge clear<lb/> of all suspicion — suppose him not to be an object of<lb/> <add>natural</add> distress on any account, Juries are <add> a Jury is</add> a mere nuisance.<lb/> For what quality is it that you would look to a Jury in preference<lb/> to a professional Judge? For superiority of intelligence? for superiority<lb/>of experience? for superiority in respect of that quickness and <lb/> accuracy of discernment which is acquired by <add> the fruit of</add> experience? — no<lb/> certainly.</p> | |||
1805
Evidence Procedure
Jury
1
Jury — its true non
are physic — not as food</note>
The true use of the institution of Juries seems very apt to be
misunderstood: [the use of it to the judiciary system as of is rather in the character of evidence
than of food.] Employed in its true character and it
gives a degree of wealth of perfection to the system such as can never be
given to it by any other means: but the character in which it
is really of use seems rather to be that of occasional medium than daily food.
How many lives are every day saved, how many afflictive/cruel diseases banished by mercury, bark quinquisia and antimony
opium? Is it any disparagement to the virtues of these incomparable admirable
medicines, to say that they would prove but indifferent. absolutely
to bread or potatoes?
The relief offered by
Courts of Conscience
would be by Jury
trial introduction of Juries
Substitute Trial by Jury to the natural and summary mode
of procedure employed pursued in the Courts of Conscience: what vexation
what denial of justice would such a change produce be the result of such a change!
A Jury is of no use
but as an antidote
to improbity in a Judge
his improbity of intellectual
qualifications
can be expected from
them.
The use and only use of the institution of a Jury is to
serve as an in the character of an antidote as an antidote to the poison of improbity in the <gap>
of the professional Judge. It is Suppose your Judge clear
of all suspicion — suppose him not to be an object of
natural distress on any account, Juries are a Jury is a mere nuisance.
For what quality is it that you would look to a Jury in preference
to a professional Judge? For superiority of intelligence? for superiority
of experience? for superiority in respect of that quickness and
accuracy of discernment which is acquired by the fruit of experience? — no
certainly.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/102/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1805 |
not numbered |
||
|
057 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
102 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::[evidence deleted] procedure]] |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
18432 |
|||
