JB/057/112/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/112/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- date, heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <p>6 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1805</p> <head>Procedure</head> <p><note>Procedure Removal<lb/> <sic>Ch. Degrees number</note><lb/>(1</p> <p><note>1<lb/>degrees ought not to be<lb/> more than two</p> <p> <sic>Ch.</sic> or §§. Number of degrees ought not to be more than two.</p> <p> That the number of degrees of jurisdiction ought not to be<lb/> more than two will be <add>made</add> evident enough by the <add>same</add> considerations by<lb/> which the propriety of <del> an</del> allowing the right of removal were brought<lb/> to view.</p> <p>2<lb/> Reasons<lb/> 1. <add>Expense</add> Vexation &amp; delay <sic>encreased</sic><lb/> at every degree<lb/> 2. Chance of right<lb/> decision not <sic>encreased</sic> <lb/> 3 &#x2014; but diminished<lb/> viz: by substituting<lb/> to the best tribunal acting<lb/> under the eye of the best<lb/> <gap/> one inferior intermediate<lb/> one.</note></p> <p> At the metropolis <del> is the best judicature, his aptitude secured</del> <add>sits the fittest Judge</add> <lb/>with the eye of the best public to secure his aptitude.  <del>A To any</del> <add> With the cause to be</add><lb/> <add>supposed to be <del><>gap/></del> removed into any</add> intermediate tribunal <del>the cause could not be brought</del> in the first<lb/> place, there would be so much the more expense, vexation and<lb/> delay: in the next place so much the worse chance for good<lb/> judicature: so far would the expense <del>and</del> vexation and delay be<lb/> from being compensated <add><sic>counterweighed</sic></add> in any the least degree by any counter<lb/> advantage.</p>





Revision as of 11:02, 19 February 2019

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug. 1805

Procedure

Procedure Removal
<sic>Ch. Degrees number

(1

1
degrees ought not to be
more than two

Ch. or §§. Number of degrees ought not to be more than two.

That the number of degrees of jurisdiction ought not to be
more than two will be made evident enough by the same considerations by
which the propriety of an allowing the right of removal were brought
to view.

2
Reasons
1. Expense Vexation & delay encreased
at every degree
2. Chance of right
decision not encreased
3 — but diminished
viz: by substituting
to the best tribunal acting
under the eye of the best
one inferior intermediate
one.

At the metropolis is the best judicature, his aptitude secured sits the fittest Judge
with the eye of the best public to secure his aptitude. A To any With the cause to be
supposed to be <>gap/> removed into any intermediate tribunal the cause could not be brought in the first
place, there would be so much the more expense, vexation and
delay: in the next place so much the worse chance for good
judicature: so far would the expense and vexation and delay be
from being compensated counterweighed in any the least degree by any counter
advantage.




Identifier: | JB/057/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1805-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

procedure

Image

001

Titles

number of degrees ought not to be more than two

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18442

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in