★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>1825. <del> | <head>1825. <del>Janu<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></del> March 4<lb/> Constitutional Code</head> <p><note> <!-- addition in pencil --> <add>IV or III</add><lb/> <sic>Ch.</sic> XII Judicary<lb/>S.</note></p> <p>Information or Rationale</p> <p> <sic>Intercommunity</sic> of jurisdiction — Instruction — Rationale</p> <p><note>19<lb/> From <sic>intercommunity</sic><lb/> of <del>Judicatories</del> <add> jurisdiction</add> no<lb/> confusion to be feared</note></p> <p> From <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> <sic>unusuality</sic> in this case no <gap/><lb/> and to <gap/> not inform should in any <gap/> <gap/><lb/> By <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/> will in any case be detriment</p> <p>In the English system <add>within the <gap/> of England</add> such <sic>intercommunity</sic> has place throughout<lb/> for the whole of England extends the authority of the<lb/> first <gap/> <gap/> Westminster Hall <del>Court</del> judicature filled by<lb/> the highest professional Judges — to wit the Chancery, the Exchequer<lb/> the King's Bench and the Common Pleas</p> <p><note>20<lb/> Circuitous proceeding<lb/> in Equity requisitioning</note></p> <p> True it is the Chancery who applied to be a <gap/> <add> by an address</add> <lb/> in a certain form that of an Injunction <del><gap/></del> <sic>stopt</sic> of it <gap/> <gap/><lb/> at any <add>every</add> thing. Short of <unclear>executors</unclear> the proceedings of the three <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <gap/> to wit the Kings Bench the Common <gap/>, and the<lb/> Common Law side of the Exchequer: so between <add>does</add> the Equity and<lb/> of the Court of Exchequer <!-- brackets in pencil --> (that is to say) <!-- blank space --> four Judges of the<lb/> Court of Exchequer when <add>if</add> applied in and by an address in the <gap/><lb/> form stop them <add> and set at nought</add> <gap/> proceeding, <gap/> of the to wit as had been<lb/> <gap/> in the Common Law mode. <!-- brackets in pencil -->(Seeing these exceptions the) <add> With this <gap/></add><lb/> <sic>intercommunity</sic> may without an exception with <gap/> be dull<lb/> as<gap/></p> <p> True it is that in <add>under</add> the <add>same</add> technical system the division of<lb/> the field of jurisdiction is made upon the logical plan; not<lb/> upon the topological <add> topographical</add>: one <del>n</del> and the same portion <add> mass extent</add> of Writers<lb/> can have the <sic>cognizance</sic> of an species of suits, <gap/> of another.</p> <p>But of the topographical plan <add>scheme</add> the divisions are as <add>plain</add> clear<lb/> are indisputable as under the logical plan are cloudy unexposed<lb/> to dispute: they will therefore in the case therefore they will<lb/> be still more assuredly exempt from all confusion in practice.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1825. Januy March 4
Constitutional Code
IV or III
Ch. XII Judicary
S.
Information or Rationale
Intercommunity of jurisdiction — Instruction — Rationale
19
From intercommunity
of Judicatories jurisdiction no
confusion to be feared
From the unusuality in this case no
and to not inform should in any
By of will in any case be detriment
In the English system within the of England such intercommunity has place throughout
for the whole of England extends the authority of the
first Westminster Hall Court judicature filled by
the highest professional Judges — to wit the Chancery, the Exchequer
the King's Bench and the Common Pleas
20
Circuitous proceeding
in Equity requisitioning
True it is the Chancery who applied to be a by an address
in a certain form that of an Injunction stopt of it
at any every thing. Short of executors the proceedings of the three
to wit the Kings Bench the Common , and the
Common Law side of the Exchequer: so between does the Equity and
of the Court of Exchequer (that is to say) four Judges of the
Court of Exchequer when if applied in and by an address in the
form stop them and set at nought proceeding, of the to wit as had been
in the Common Law mode. (Seeing these exceptions the) With this
intercommunity may without an exception with be dull
as
True it is that in under the same technical system the division of
the field of jurisdiction is made upon the logical plan; not
upon the topological topographical: one n and the same portion mass extent of Writers
can have the cognizance of an species of suits, of another.
But of the topographical plan scheme the divisions are as plain clear
are indisputable as under the logical plan are cloudy unexposed
to dispute: they will therefore in the case therefore they will
be still more assuredly exempt from all confusion in practice.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/136/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-03-04 |
19-20 |
||
|
057 |
constitutional code |
||
|
136 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
intercommunity of judicature - instructions or rationale |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18466 |
|||
