JB/057/184/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/184/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1824 <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 2<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><gap/> cause impossibility<lb/><gap/> <gap/></p> <!-- text in pencil apart from Ch and § -->  <p>7<lb/><note>Ch.</note><lb/>7 <note>§. Non pursuance of Notice</note></p> <p><note>21<lb/>Decease of a relative<lb/> not admissible as an<lb/>excuse for no attendance<lb/> 1 Not of a wife or husband<lb/> 2 nor of a father, mother<lb/> or daughter<lb/>3 nor of a partner in<lb/> trade<lb/> 4 nor of a testator</note></p> <p><sic>art.</sic>  Decease, how recent so ever, of a relative<lb/> how nearly connected so ever, ought <add>should</add> not in any case <lb/> to be accepted as an exculpatory excuse for non-attendance<lb/> <del>reasons</del> Examples.<lb/> 1. Not the immediate decease of a wife or husband<lb/> 2 <add><del>Reason</del></add> <gap/> of a Father <add>or Mother</add> son or daughter<lb/> 3. Nor of a partner in trade or occupation<lb/> 4. Nor of a testator whose testamentary executor the individual <lb/> in question is</p> <p><note>22<lb/> Reasons<lb/> 1 Complication of rule<lb/> of action<lb/> 2 Insufficiency for<lb/> intended purpose<lb/> 3 Foundation in<lb/> reason none</note></p> <p>Reasons</p> <p>1. Complication <!-- brackets in pencil --> [ and addition to the <add>aggregate</add> bulk of the rule <gap/> <gap/>]<lb/> that would be the necessary <del><gap/></del> result of the undertaking<lb/> to draw an appropriate and correct line between the cases<lb/>in which such relationship shall, and those on which it<lb/>shall not, be received as an excuse.</p> <p>2. Insufficiency of any sort <gap/> in respect of its intended<lb/> purpose, The <add>Sole</add> purpose <gap/> to aggravate affliction<lb/>But of the degree of affection and chance of affection no<lb/> case if less degree of propinquity in respect of family<lb/> relationship natural and <gap/> can not afford any<lb/>tolerably <add>adequate</add> or adequate ground of <gap/>: a less <gap/><lb/>may be drawn than one who is nearer: the most <gap/><lb/>may <gap/> of being dear be <gap/></p> <p>3. The foundation in point of reason <gap/> altogether<lb/> This foundation is the assumption <add><gap/></add> that by <add>from</add> compliance<lb/> with an obligation of this sort, affliction would receive<lb/>an <sic>encrease</sic>  The fact is &#x2014; that <del>of</del> the alternative, if any<lb/> would be on the side of diminution.  Whatsoever may be<lb/>the casue of the affliction, whatsoever calls of the mind from the<lb/> consideration of the cause, diminution the effect.</p>





Revision as of 10:54, 23 April 2019

Click Here To Edit

1824 Feby 2
Procedure Code

cause impossibility

7
Ch.
7 §. Non pursuance of Notice

21
Decease of a relative
not admissible as an
excuse for no attendance
1 Not of a wife or husband
2 nor of a father, mother
or daughter
3 nor of a partner in
trade
4 nor of a testator

art. Decease, how recent so ever, of a relative
how nearly connected so ever, ought should not in any case
to be accepted as an exculpatory excuse for non-attendance
reasons Examples.
1. Not the immediate decease of a wife or husband
2 Reason of a Father or Mother son or daughter
3. Nor of a partner in trade or occupation
4. Nor of a testator whose testamentary executor the individual
in question is

22
Reasons
1 Complication of rule
of action
2 Insufficiency for
intended purpose
3 Foundation in
reason none

Reasons

1. Complication [ and addition to the aggregate bulk of the rule ]
that would be the necessary result of the undertaking
to draw an appropriate and correct line between the cases
in which such relationship shall, and those on which it
shall not, be received as an excuse.

2. Insufficiency of any sort in respect of its intended
purpose, The Sole purpose to aggravate affliction
But of the degree of affection and chance of affection no
case if less degree of propinquity in respect of family
relationship natural and can not afford any
tolerably adequate or adequate ground of : a less
may be drawn than one who is nearer: the most
may of being dear be

3. The foundation in point of reason altogether
This foundation is the assumption that by from compliance
with an obligation of this sort, affliction would receive
an encrease The fact is — that of the alternative, if any
would be on the side of diminution. Whatsoever may be
the casue of the affliction, whatsoever calls of the mind from the
consideration of the cause, diminution the effect.




Identifier: | JB/057/184/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1824-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

21-22

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

184

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18514

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in