JB/137/040/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/040/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:
impossible </note><lb/>
impossible </note><lb/>


<p>The hands under which the matter necessary for the purpose<lb/>
will be ra<gap/> are the following</p>


 
1. Intended Sh<gap/> who - <del>stated</del> the statement being in the first<lb/>
 
instance given as it must be in <add>provisionally, and </add> general <gap/>.  Say for <note>shortness <del>Intended Sh<gap/></del>
<hi rend="underline">or a first view.</hi></note><lb/>
<p>2 I. <del>Effects of the Scheme</del> <add><del>Nature Explanation</del> Development of the <del><gap/></del> inspected design</add>  on the supposition that the shares<lb/>
are to be all equal.  Say for shortness <hi rend="underline">Shares equal</hi></p>
<p>3. 1. <hi rend="underline">Subject matter, mode of operation and immediate</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">operators</hi> - These topics will <add>being inseparable in existence</add> require to be brought to view<lb/>
together.</p>
<p>4. <del>Subject matter</del> The scheme applied to I<hi rend="underline">mm</hi>oveable <lb/>
<del>articles</del> subject matter of rights of property say <add> for shortness</add> <del>in <gap/></del><lb/>
and <hi rend="underline">Immoveable</hi>  <hi rend="underline">Subject matter Immoveable</hi></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:46, 25 April 2019

Click Here To Edit ult
1. Nature of the case
or
The following
experience should
have been made
O in the first instances
by the Prince Regents advisors by whom
the rad were
charged with their
design

1819 Decr 18

- Radicalism not dangerous


I shall now p proceed to do what the Prince Regent's
advisers should first have done, namely bring to view the consequences
that would result from the supposed subversion
of the rights of property: namely not from the accomplishment
of it - for that would be physically impossible - but
from the notoriety of a determinitive to carry
make any advances towards the carrying of such a design
such effect by any of person having power adequate to
the purpose.

or 2
under which
ing is

1. Intended Sh who
view
2. equal
3. Subject remedy
proposition
4. Subject matter
inimitable
5. Subject matters

6. Subject matters
7. Intended
8.
9. Impossibility of all
other so design
10.
be of the

11. The de impractical
impossible

The hands under which the matter necessary for the purpose
will be ra are the following

1. Intended Sh who - stated the statement being in the first
instance given as it must be in provisionally, and general . Say for shortness Intended Sh or a first view.

2 I. Effects of the Scheme Nature Explanation Development of the inspected design on the supposition that the shares
are to be all equal. Say for shortness Shares equal

3. 1. Subject matter, mode of operation and immediate
operators - These topics will being inseparable in existence require to be brought to view
together.

4. Subject matter The scheme applied to Immoveable
articles subject matter of rights of property say for shortness in
and Immoveable Subject matter Immoveable



Identifier: | JB/137/040/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

040

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46757

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in