JB/057/197/001

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 4
Procedure Code

4
Ch.
4 §. Transference of suits

5
On the occasion of
this decision power
to Judge to issue mandates
incontiguous judicatories

Art. On this occasion of his option decision/the option of the Judge be the
effect choice the Defendants attendance [of the proposed defendant] to be
paid at his (the Judges) own judicatory has to <gap/. a
by the Constitutional Code Ch. p is given to give
his authority to mandates for this purpose throughout all the several
Immediate Judges territories immediately contiguous to his
Quere whether a should not be made ?

6
If his decision be
to transfer require
Defendants attendance
in another judicatory
he will transfer the
suit accordingly

Art. If his option be to permitt require the
attendance of the proposed Defendant in to some other judicatory
he will remitt transfer the cognizance of the suit to such other
judicatory, and if such remission transfer give information to the pursuer

<p.7
The judicatory in
question will be that
of the proposed
Defendant

<p.ARt. If say to any other judicatory the transfer
such as that here in question be made it will be to the proposed
Defendant's judicatory: and it will in point of reason it will<lb?> have for its ground the opinion that in this case the source of
vexation and expense to all taken together will be less than
if the suit were returned in the judicatory to which the application
was made.

Identifier: | JB/057/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.
Date_1	1825-03-04	Marginal Summary Numbering	5-7
Box	057	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	197	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d4 / e4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	18527
Box Contents